Vagrant Hearts Zero

About

Vagrant Hearts Zero is a single player casual role playing game. It was developed by Warfare Studios and was released on April 28, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

The prequel to the hit series Vagrant Hearts, Warfare Studios' most acclaimed RPG adventure!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 23 reviews

graphics3 negative mentions

The storyline is engaging and connects well with the previous games in the series.
The game is a decent time-waster, providing a fun experience for a few hours.
It offers a unique perspective on the background of the Vagrant Hearts universe.

The game is incredibly easy and lacks challenge compared to its predecessors.
It suffers from numerous bugs and stability issues, especially on modern systems.
The graphics and overall design feel amateurish and uninspired, with many elements being generic.

story
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The story in the Vagrant Hearts series is generally viewed as a mixed bag; while some players appreciate its origins and find it cute, many criticize it for being tropey, bland, and short, with unremarkable characters and music. The narrative often feels irrelevant shortly after key events, and technical issues detract from the experience. Overall, it offers a decent storyline but lacks depth and engagement typical of more polished RPGs.
- “I really do enjoy the storyline and where it originated from.”
- “But the reason I have bought all Vagrant Hearts games is the storyline and some decent combat.”
- “But it's a cute game, decent storyline, and fun to play.”
- “It checks all the usual elements of an awful RPG Maker game: tropey and bland JRPG characters, generic assets, grinding, boring music and storyline, huge, empty maze-like dungeons with no map feature that are a nightmare to navigate, short, too easy...”
- “Story happens, then whatever happens becomes irrelevant within minutes, but not in a good way.”
- “I had a bug happen at nearly every story point.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The graphics in the game are generally considered decent but lack innovation, with many users expressing a preference for the styles of earlier installments. There are notable issues with graphical fidelity, including map inconsistencies and errors such as clipping and walk-through objects, which detract from the overall experience.
- “I prefer the graphics and game style of parts 1 and 2.”
- “The graphics are more or less copy and paste on a raw level; even I could do better.”
- “The graphics are never terrible, but they never go beyond decent, and the maps are full of graphical errors where parts of buildings are cut off or you can walk through things that seem like they should be solid.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is described as generic and unremarkable, contributing to an overall bland experience that fails to enhance the gameplay. While it may provide a brief moment of relaxation, it ultimately lacks the depth and engagement expected from a quality RPG.
- “It checks all the usual elements of an awful RPG Maker game: tropey and bland JRPG characters, generic assets, grinding, boring music and storyline, huge, empty maze-like dungeons with no map feature that are a nightmare to navigate.”
- “Similarly, the music, story, and characters all exist, but are pretty unremarkable.”
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviews indicate that the grinding in this RPG Maker game is tedious and unengaging, contributing to an overall experience that feels bland and uninspired. Players find the repetitive nature of grinding exacerbated by poorly designed dungeons and a lack of meaningful content, making the gameplay feel monotonous.
- “It checks all the usual elements of an awful RPG Maker game: tropey and bland JRPG characters, generic assets, grinding, boring music and storyline, huge, empty maze-like dungeons with no map feature that are a nightmare to navigate.”
- “The grinding is relentless and feels more like a chore than a rewarding experience, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I found the grinding to be tedious and repetitive, which detracted from the overall enjoyment of the game.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay is criticized for being tedious and unengaging, requiring players to traverse areas without meaningful interaction or events, leading to a frustrating experience.
- “Extends gameplay by making you walk around aimlessly while nothing happens.”
- “The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks any real challenge or excitement.”
- “Controls are clunky and make the gameplay frustrating rather than enjoyable.”