Urbance Clans Card Battle

About

Urbance Clans Card Battle is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Plug In Digital and was released on October 3, 2018. It received neutral reviews from players.

Street gangs rise up in Neo-City. Time has come to gather your own gang to take over the whole city, district after district. Takedowns will happen, show no mercy if you wanna survive.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

42%

Audience ScoreBased on 12 reviews

music1 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game features a vibrant and stylish neo-futuristic art style that captivates players.
The card battling system is easy to understand and allows for deckbuilding strategies, making it accessible for newcomers.
At its low price point, the game offers decent value for a few hours of gameplay.

The game suffers from a lack of balance in the late game and relies heavily on luck with card draws.
The campaign is short, with a generic story and repetitive conflicts, leading to a lack of engagement.
Technical aspects are subpar, with basic 2D visuals that do not meet modern gaming standards, making it feel more like a mobile app.

story
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The game's story is criticized for being weak, generic, and poorly written, with shallow characters and minimal narrative depth. Players note that the campaign is short, offering only a few hours of gameplay, and lacks engaging content, making it feel more like an afterthought than a central feature. Overall, the storytelling is described as the bare minimum, failing to enhance the gaming experience.
- “At the time of this review, the game's 75% off, so I can recommend it for such a price (1.24€) as you'll get a decent 2-3 hours of playing through the story mode.”
- “This is a weak cyberpunk-themed CCG where you battle various enemies in a linear campaign. Don't get too excited about there being a campaign because there are not many fights, little to no story, and what story there is, is weak and badly written.”
- “The 'story' is there although it's not interesting at all and characters are very shallow.”
- “The storytelling, if you can call it that, is the bare minimum at best.”
gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The gameplay is centered around deckbuilding and card battling mechanics, which some players find appealing, but overall it is described as average and somewhat disappointing. With a playtime of less than four hours and a generic story, the experience may feel too short and basic for some, though the game's price point is considered reasonable given its artistic presentation.
- “Intrigued by the potential of its deckbuilding and card battling mechanics, I decided to give it a try.”
- “If you are interested in the game, keep in mind that you should get it for the gameplay alone.”
- “Too short (less than 4 hours for the first gameplay), a generic story, a basic card game.”
- “Disappointing, boring gameplay.”
- “For its price, I'd say it lives up to it, has nice art and subpar mechanics.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's graphics are characterized by simplistic 2D art assets that, while appealing to some extent, lack depth and quality, offering little improvement even with resolution adjustments. Overall, the visuals are considered average and uninspired, failing to meet the expectations of modern gamers accustomed to more sophisticated graphics.
- “Considering its price, I believe it offers reasonable value, featuring appealing artwork.”
- “The game features simple, fairly basic 2D visuals, and while some effort went into them, they don't look bad exactly, but they don't look great, either.”
- “In the 3D era of gaming, that kicked off in the mid-1990s with dedicated 3D GPUs like the S3 Virge and ATI Rage, phoning in the graphics like this isn't going to win any awards or appeal to enthusiast PC gamers.”
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic 2D art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the lackluster 2D visuals.”
- “The game features simple, fairly basic 2D visuals, and while some effort went into them, and they don't look bad exactly, they don't look great, either.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players criticize the grinding aspect of the game, comparing it unfavorably to free-to-play titles like MTG: Arena and Hearthstone, which offer similar experiences without the financial burden. The consensus suggests that the game's monetization model exacerbates the grind, making it feel less rewarding.
- “It's a rather poor ripoff of games like MTG: Arena and Hearthstone, but this costs money while those are free to play if you don't mind grinding.”
- “The grinding in this game feels endless and tedious, making it hard to enjoy the overall experience.”
- “I found myself spending more time grinding for resources than actually playing the game, which really dampened my enthusiasm.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is praised for its artistry and thematic depth, but many users feel that it is ultimately undermined by questionable management decisions.