Universe Sandbox Legacy

About

Universe Sandbox Legacy is a realistic gravity simulator that allows players to create and explore their own universe. With accurate representations of gravitational forces, collisions, and stellar evolution, players can experiment with various celestial bodies and observe the results. The game also features a variety of customization options, providing endless possibilities for space exploration and discovery.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 3,511 reviews

gameplay9 positive mentions

stability36 negative mentions

Great for experimenting with astrophysics and understanding the universe.
Fun to create and destroy celestial bodies, allowing for endless creativity.
Educational tool that can help teach concepts of gravity and planetary motion.

Game crashes frequently and has poor optimization, especially with complex simulations.
Achievements are often unreasonable, requiring excessive playtime or actions.
Limited content and can become boring quickly for casual players.

gameplay
73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
77%
11%
The gameplay of the game is generally considered lacking, with many users noting that it feels more like a simulation than a traditional game, offering limited content and mechanics that can lead to boredom. While it provides a decent introduction to celestial mechanics and has intuitive controls, the overall experience is described as dull and lacking in engaging gameplay elements. Some players appreciate its educational value and graphics, but many feel it requires a significant amount of imagination to derive enjoyment from it.
- “Gameplay is innovative, with better AI, more weapons, and maps.”
- “Once you understand the core mechanics, it gets pretty fun.”
- “Pretty neat, gives you a better understanding of the mechanics of gravity that are difficult to learn elsewhere.”
- “Besides that, there is literally no gameplay in this game.”
- “There just wasn't enough content to keep me interested, and all I was basically doing was changing the size of some planet or crashing two suns into each other (and I was not impressed with the collision mechanics).”
- “While perhaps suitable for providing a visual model of a solar system, after meticulous setup by an adult, there is really nothing here resembling gameplay.”
graphics
66 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
52%
21%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many users noting that they are mediocre or poor by modern standards, yet some appreciate the artistic representation of celestial bodies and the educational value it provides. While some players find the visuals adequate for a simulation, others express disappointment, especially in comparison to its sequel. Overall, the graphics are seen as a secondary concern to the game's educational and simulation aspects.
- “I like the planets and the graphics are outstanding!”
- “Celestial bodies under your control, excellent graphics, and great simulation of both gravity and orbital mechanics lend this game a lot of credit.”
- “Beautiful graphics and hilarious physics of the universe wait for you to reveal it.”
- “Graphics suck and there isn't a lot to do...”
- “Graphics are mediocre, performance is mediocre, has a lot of boxes for parameters for objects, which one would assume means they are used properly, but the physics is extremely flawed.”
- “It doesn't seem to use any graphics power and doesn't use more than one CPU core.”
stability
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for its instability, with numerous users reporting frequent crashes, significant bugs, and performance issues that detract from the overall experience. Many players describe it as unoptimized and frustratingly buggy, leading to game-breaking glitches and a poor interface. Overall, the consensus is that while the concept is promising, the execution is severely lacking due to these stability problems.
- “This game is very buggy and crashes frequently on my machines.”
- “Horrible interface, buggy and unstable as hell, and poorly executed on the whole.”
- “This 'game' seemed like a really cool concept when I bought it, but as I have come to find out, it's just a buggy abandoned mess.”
story
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
61%
28%
The game lacks a traditional narrative or story mode, offering no missions or adventures for players to engage with. While it provides a fun and educational experience with various mechanics and simulations, it does not deliver a compelling storyline or emotional depth, leaving players to create their own narratives outside of the game. Overall, the absence of a structured story is a significant drawback for those seeking a more immersive experience.
- “I used this game to render a solar system for a fantasy story I am making.”
- “The game has enough mechanics to actually put in a lot of detail to your story.”
- “This is a fun and educational game which has decent graphics, many textures for all the planets and asteroids with lots of fan-made and pre-made simulations which keeps the game fresh.”
- “Universe Sandbox won't portray a story, and it won't hold your hand past a brief instructional practice that demonstrates the interface.”
- “It won't tug at your heartstrings, nor give you a story to tell your friends.”
- “This is a fun and educational game which has decent graphics, many textures for all the planets and asteroids with lots of fan-made and pre-made simulations which keeps the game fresh, but there is not a massive amount in terms of story or anything to strive for, which is a major letdown.”
music
36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
78%
11%
The game has been widely criticized for its complete lack of music and ambient sound, which many players find boring and detrimental to the overall experience. Reviewers express a desire for a soundtrack to enhance gameplay, suggesting that even casual background music would significantly improve the atmosphere. While some players recommend providing their own music, the absence of any in-game audio remains a major grievance.
- “A fun way to spend some time while listening to music (preferably Holst's 'The Planets').”
- “The only thing that can make this better is some casual background music as you throw the Earth into the sun or send a rampaging black hole through the solar system.”
- “Then again, you can provide your own soundtrack in the background, whether that be spacey trance or death metal.”
- “One major issue is that the game lacks a soundtrack.”
- “No soundtrack which was part of the reason I bought it (videos all have awesome music playing as you watch, the game is silent).”
- “Kind of boring, difficult to use, and literally no sound at all (not even music!).”
humor
28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its absurd and whimsical elements, such as amusing achievements and the ability to create ridiculous cosmic scenarios, like soccer balls orbiting a giant sun. While many players find the game hilarious and entertaining for short bursts, some feel that the novelty wears off quickly, leading to boredom if played solely for fun. Overall, it appeals to those who appreciate a blend of humor and educational content about space.
- “Beautiful graphics and hilarious physics of the universe wait for you to reveal it.”
- “This is a funny game about destroying the universe ;)”
- “Yet, if I had to describe this game in one word, it would be: hilarious.”
replayability
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The game's replayability is highly subjective, with some players finding it enjoyable and filled with achievements, while others feel it lacks significant value after the initial playthrough. Overall, opinions vary widely, with some rating it as a 3/5 for replayability, and others stating it has little to no incentive for repeated play. The tutorial is noted as a redeeming aspect that can be revisited for fun and information.
- “Amazing achievements and endless replayability.”
- “The only thing close to that is a short tutorial which is quite informative and fun, which is also replayable.”
- “It's a fun little sim to play around with, not much replay value though.”
- “Replayable depending upon your own interest in this sort of thing.”
- “Replayability 3/5”
monetization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized by users, who describe it as a cash grab, particularly in light of the game's rebranding and perceived abandonment by developers. Many feel that the transition to new versions has exploited loyal customers, leading to disappointment and frustration over the lack of value in recent offerings.
- “Do not buy this or the new one. The games have been abandoned and Universe Sandbox 2 was renamed to this one. This has changed to Legacy. The developers need to be kicked from Steam as it's just a cash grab.”
- “Bought this game like 13 years ago and now it's been usurped by another cash grab.”
- “I thought maybe it would be on sale, but now I see this version and the next were cash grabs.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The game's atmosphere is visually stunning, featuring beautifully rendered nebulae and planetary environments. However, players express disappointment over the lack of interactivity, wishing for the ability to explore and customize planetary surfaces and atmospheres rather than being limited to predesigned worlds.
- “Beautifully rendered nebulae and planetary atmospheres.”
- “I bought this game thinking it would allow you to edit planets' atmosphere colors and material makeup and interesting things like that; instead, it gives you pre-designed planets, like Earth and Mars.”
- “The game is awesome, but it would be great if you could actually browse the surface of the planets and have a full realistic experience of the planets and their atmosphere.”
- “- beautifully rendered nebulae and planetary atmospheres.”
optimization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's optimization has been widely criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, mediocre graphics, and performance issues. While it is designed for casual and educational use, many find the physics system flawed and the overall experience unintuitive.
- “It's buggy, unoptimized, and unintuitive.”
- “I understand the game is optimized for normal computers and is for educational/fun purposes, not scientific ones, but this is ridiculous.”
- “Graphics are mediocre, performance is mediocre, has a lot of boxes for parameters for objects, which one would assume means they are used properly, but the physics is extremely flawed.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game excessively tedious, with many feeling that the achievements require an unreasonable time investment. There is a desire for more meaningful in-game goals that encourage exploration and creativity, rather than focusing on repetitive tasks. Overall, the grinding is seen as a detractor from the overall experience.
- “I automated the more grindy achievements, because honestly that's ridiculously excessive.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Instead of some of the rather pointless and grindy achievements, it would have been great if the devs would have added some achievements or in-game goals that guided players towards discovering some of the cool things that happen when you mess around with the universe in specific ways.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players report a profound emotional impact from the game, often experiencing tears due to its exploration of existential themes and the beauty of the universe. The narrative evokes feelings of vulnerability and introspection, leading to a deep connection with the game's message.
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “This game literally made me cry for the beauty of the universe and realizing how inferior I am.”