Trackday Manager

About

Trackday Manager is a multiplayer racing game. It was developed by Arctic Hazard Game Studio a/s and was released on March 31, 2016. It received neutral reviews from players.

Ready for something new? Trackday Manager introduces a new category of skill based race car management in a multiplayer online environment.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Multi-Player

Skip User Reviews

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 207 reviews

gameplay10 positive mentions

stability17 negative mentions

The game has a unique and fun concept, allowing players to manage a racing team and make strategic decisions during races.
Despite its current bugs and server issues, many players find the gameplay addictive and enjoyable, with a strong sense of competition.
The developers are responsive to community feedback and have been actively working on updates and improvements.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs, including server connectivity issues and crashes, making it frustrating to play.
There is a lack of content, with only a few cars and tracks available, leading to repetitive gameplay.
The matchmaking system is poor, often pairing inexperienced players with those who have fully upgraded cars, resulting in an unbalanced experience.

gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
35%
15%
The gameplay is generally described as addictive and enjoyable, particularly for racing fans, with a mix of management elements that allow for customization and sponsor handling. However, some players note issues with depth, content, and control responsiveness, as well as technical problems like lag and crashes. Overall, while the game shows potential and offers a casual experience, it requires further development to enhance its gameplay mechanics and stability.
- “I find the gameplay really good; of course, some will find it boring, but I am a huge racing fan.”
- “The gameplay is great, and the racing is incredibly balanced and fun.”
- “Massive potential, and remarkably simple yet addictive gameplay.”
- “Pretty easy mechanics, but monotonous is a good way to describe sponsorship (10/10 immersion there).”
- “I'm addicted, but the development of this game will have to focus on real gameplay for me to stay addicted.”
- “Edit: After 2 days of gameplay, I have noticed that the game crashes and lags a lot.”
graphics
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
33%
17%
Overall, the graphics of the game are generally well-received, with many users praising their quality and suitability for the game's concept, especially considering its low price point. While some players note that the graphics are not groundbreaking, they appreciate the visual appeal and find them to be a strong aspect of the game. However, there are criticisms regarding the lack of damage simulation and some lingering bugs that detract from the overall experience.
- “I think the graphics are nice for a game that retails for under $12.”
- “Game is very addictive, good graphics and very fun.”
- “Graphics are solid and suit the concept and focus of the game.”
- “Rather than fixing such bugs and failures that have been around since day one, they 'corrected' some graphic issues or added some cars nobody was asking for.”
- “Graphics aren't worth a million bucks; there's no damage simulation at all, so mega crashes can happen and no damage appears.”
- “The graphics are a bit late 2000s, but still very acceptable for what it is.”
stability
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is a significant concern, with numerous users reporting it as "buggy" and "borderline unplayable," particularly in multiplayer modes. While some players find humor in the glitches and acknowledge the developers' efforts to address issues, many express frustration over frequent crashes and game freezes, leading to a lack of confidence in its current state. Overall, the game is seen as unfinished, with stability issues detracting from the overall experience.
- “It's awfully buggy, and borderline unplayable.”
- “Currently this game is unplayable; I've recently tried to get back into this game, but every time someone disconnects, your game freezes and it is completely unacceptable.”
- “The game is completely unfinished and very buggy.”
optimization
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
28%
43%
The optimization of the game has been criticized for its slow progression in earning money to enhance car performance, leading to frustration among players. Additionally, issues with erratic AI behavior and performance inconsistencies after upgrades have detracted from the overall experience, highlighting a need for significant software improvements and bug fixes.
- “There's a handful of cars that you can modify for improved performance; you need to negotiate contracts and display their logos on your car, the typical fare.”
- “At this stage, the biggest problems are the performance of the software itself.”
- “Too long to earn enough money to increase the performance of the car or the garage.”
- “I was doing really well in races until I upgraded my car, and now performance is worse than the starter car - so very quickly this game has become 'not fun'.”
- “Bugs need to be squashed and performance needs to be worked on and improved.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it lackluster and resorting to muting it in favor of their own playlists. However, a few users appreciate the soundtrack, indicating that opinions on the music vary significantly among players.
- “The soundtrack is cool, too.”
- “Lastly, the soundtrack is just bad. I have the engine sounds and Pandora open in another window so I don't fall asleep.”
- “As for the 'placeholder music and sounds' issue, just mute it and play your own music like I do.”
- “I'm not a fan of the soundtrack.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The story is described as sad, with comparisons made to the Android game "Grand Prix Story," suggesting that it lacks depth and could benefit from additional features like more cars and a rally mode to enhance the narrative experience.
- “Ever play the Android gem called 'Grand Prix Story?' This is the next-gen version of that.”
- “The story is quite sad and lacks depth.”
- “This feels like a next-gen version of the Android gem called 'Grand Prix Story,' but it doesn't bring anything new to the table.”
- “It would have been better if they had modeled the story after 'Grand Prix Story' and included more engaging options like a rally mode.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that the humor in the game is lacking, with one user expressing disappointment and suggesting players seek out more entertaining options. However, the presence of a humorous co-commentator can enhance the experience, making it more enjoyable for some players. Overall, the game's humor is seen as a significant drawback.
- “If the commentator also has a co-commentator and they're funny as hell, even better!”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express frustration with the emotional aspect of the game, noting that excessive contact during races detracts from the competitive experience. They feel that the lack of penalties for collisions undermines the essence of racing, which should emphasize skill and strategy rather than reliance on contact. Overall, the emotional engagement is diminished by these design choices.
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that microtransactions were previously a concern but are now largely considered a non-issue, suggesting that the game's monetization strategy has shifted away from this model.
- “Microtransactions were mentioned at one point, but it seems this may be a dead issue and no longer in this game's future.”
- “The monetization model feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “I was disappointed to see that many features are locked behind paywalls, which detracts from the overall experience.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express disappointment in the game's replayability, feeling that the early access version does not offer enough content or engagement to justify the purchase.
- “I regret paying money for this; I thought early access would be more playable.”
- “Once you finish the game, there's really no reason to go back. The lack of meaningful choices makes replaying it feel pointless.”
- “The game offers very little in terms of different outcomes or experiences, making it hard to justify multiple playthroughs.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding in the game to be extensive and time-consuming, requiring significant effort to earn upgrades, with some reporting spending over 12 hours on 46 races for minimal progress. The experience can be frustrating, especially when competing against more advanced teams, making it appealing primarily to those who enjoy persistent challenges and are willing to invest considerable time.
- “After grinding through 46 races and playing for 12 hours, I finally afforded some upgrades for my cars.”
- “If you don't mind losing, trying to figure out the game while racing against fully invested teams, and you love to beat your face into the keyboard grinding 1.5k a race to maybe have a chance a month or so down the road, this game is for you.”