Tiny Civilization

About

Tiny Civilization is a turn-based 4X strategy game where players build and manage their ancient civilization. Manage resources, research technologies, and engage in diplomacy or warfare to expand your empire. With charming pixel art style and simple mechanics, it's a fun and accessible introduction to the 4X genre.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

95%

Audience ScoreBased on 376 reviews

gameplay26 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Engaging and clever gameplay that combines match-3 mechanics with civilization building, providing a unique experience.
Well-paced introduction of new mechanics keeps the game interesting without overwhelming players.
Great value for the price, offering fun and addictive gameplay that can be enjoyed in short bursts.

Limited replay value after the initial playthrough, with some players finding the game too easy or simplistic.
Luck plays a significant role in gameplay, which can lead to frustrating experiences if food tiles do not spawn adequately.
Some technical issues and rough edges, including poor translations and a lack of depth in strategy, detract from the overall experience.

gameplay
88 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
67%
3%
The gameplay is characterized by a well-paced introduction of mechanics that are easy to learn yet challenging to master, blending match-3 elements with civilization building. While the core mechanics are engaging and provide a satisfying progression, some players noted issues with the tutorial's effectiveness and a lack of variety in higher difficulty modes. Overall, the game offers a fun and addictive experience, though it could benefit from more complex mechanics and additional content to enhance replayability.
- “Clever gameplay, good mechanics with different ways to progress regarding tech tree & resources, easy to learn, incredibly hard to master.”
- “Fantastic simple, yet engaging and challenging to master gameplay.”
- “I absolutely love this game, it has the perfect balance on complexity and fun gameplay.”
- “That combined with a lackluster tutorial leads to a flawed communication of mechanics.”
- “Ultimately, the idea is cool, and I like the style, but the poorly communicated, forced mechanics feel unfair, especially when combined with luck.”
- “More complex mechanics and more variety (e.g. random events, rival civilizations, or traits for your own civilization that can affect gameplay in different ways) could have been interesting, but are not present in this game.”
graphics
40 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
45%
47%
8%
The graphics of the game are characterized by a charming and cute art style that enhances its overall appeal, with many reviewers praising the attention to detail and consistency throughout. While some describe the graphics as simplistic or crude, they are noted for being clear and functional, contributing positively to gameplay. Overall, the aesthetic is well-received, with a blend of cartoonish elements and polished artwork that fits the game's concept effectively.
- “The game offers some nice graphics and a beautiful aesthetic which is pleasant all the same and has some amazing attention to detail even though it is a little rough around the edges.”
- “The main strategy board art is cute, clear, and stylish, and the technology options and era introductions have graphics in a beautiful ligne claire style.”
- “Aesthetically it may look simple but its beauty lies in its simplicity and ease of card recognition.”
- “The graphics are charming and the controls are responsive and intuitive.”
- “The 'match 3' gameplay and strategy involved reminds me a bit of '2048,' and the cute, simplistic civ graphics remind me a little of 'The Battle of Polytopia,' but make no mistake, this game is doing things that are all its own.”
replayability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
37%
13%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players appreciate the value from multiple playthroughs, particularly with the addition of "hero mode" and various difficulty settings, others find the replay value limited after the initial hours. Many agree that the low price enhances the experience, making it worthwhile despite its brevity. Ultimately, it offers enough content for a couple of playthroughs, but may not sustain long-term interest for all players.
- “Hats off to the devs, great little game, massive replayability & great price.”
- “It's a cute little game with very good replayability.”
- “I only played 4 hours before I managed to beat the game on 'normal' mode after a couple of restarts, but the 'hero' mode is a welcome addition that increases the game's replayability and requires a bit more careful planning.”
- “These progressions remain the same in every game you play, so the game's replay value is limited.”
- “I enjoyed it for the 2 hours that I needed to achieve a victory, but I don't think it has enough replay value to keep my interest.”
- “That's a shame, considering the replay value that games like this are supposed to have, and the brief time you do spend with it will make you wish there was more.”
music
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
65%
15%
The music in the game is generally well-received, enhancing the overall experience and fitting the gameplay effectively, with notable changes that reflect different time periods. However, some players find it can become repetitive over time. Overall, the soundtrack contributes significantly to the game's atmosphere and sense of progression.
- “The music really adds a lot to the overall feel of the game and that deserves to be mentioned.”
- “When I finally passed that darkest era and got the advanced technology, the music hit me so precisely that I felt I was really on a heroic journey to bring the human race to a bright future.”
- “The music changes with the time period and I thought that feature really stood out as well.”
- “The music gets a bit annoying over time, but the gameplay is well balanced; it always keeps you on edge.”
- “No background music and the sound is quite basic, but it fits the gameplay so well.”
- “The game does not offer any settings apart from a fullscreen toggle, a resolution selector, and two separate volume sliders for music and sound.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
70%
30%
The game's narrative centers on themes of unity and progression, emphasizing a journey from the stone age to the space age. However, many users note that the game does not rely heavily on a traditional story, suggesting that gameplay can be enjoyed independently of a narrative framework.
- “This is a game which does not require any story to play.”
- “There is no story other than progressing your civilization from the stone age to the space age.”
- “This is a story of coming together no matter what.”
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game is praised for its natural pacing and technological advancements, which contribute to a well-optimized experience that keeps players engaged. Users express enthusiasm for exploring various strategies and optimizations, indicating a strong replayability factor.
- “The timing, technological progress, and development of the map size feel natural and are very well optimized to keep you entertained.”
- “I haven't managed to complete a save yet, but this is the kind of game that makes me excited to keep diving back in again with different strategies and optimizations.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players finding it both funny and challenging. It offers a short, engaging experience that can lead to quick restarts, adding to its comedic appeal. Overall, the game successfully combines humor with gameplay, making it an enjoyable indie title.
- “This is a very funny and indeed challenging game.”
- “Funny short indie game for 30 minutes to 1 hour; you can play one game or lose immediately and start over.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The monetization strategy of the game has received negative feedback, with players expressing frustration over intrusive ads and a preference for a paid ad-free experience. Additionally, the game's reliance on microtransactions, particularly in the match-3 genre, is criticized for being exploitative and detracting from the overall enjoyment.
- “Match 3 games are usually dull and dumb (and full of whale-milking microtransactions), and the type, where every merger is never a boon but where every merger adds a new type that only increases difficulty, is the worst type of match3.”
- “I'd prefer to play this on mobile, but I got it for the iPhone version and the experience there was bad (saves don't seem to load properly as my expanded map no longer fits the screen, and even worse, the ads are terrible; I'd much rather just pay for no ads).”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The stability of the game is mixed; while some users report a smooth experience with no glitches, others highlight the presence of bugs that detract from gameplay. Additionally, there are concerns about the game's lack of challenge, depth, and complexity.
- “Everything worked as it should with no glitches.”
- “Is not challenging, lacks depth and complexity, and has glitches.”
- “Is not challenging, lacks depth and complexity, and has glitches.”

Buy Tiny Civilization

Tiny Civilization
$1.99
See offer on Steam

Videos

85%666reviews

Microcivilization

2023

Strategy

89%1.7kreviews

Terraformers

2023

Turn-based Strategy

91%22.1kreviews

Into the Breach

2018

Role Playing

+12

97%15.5kreviews

Thronefall

2024

Survival Action Adventure

93%3.6kreviews

2112TD: Tower Defense Survival

2023

Strategy

Tiny Civilization

Platforms

About

Buy Tiny Civilization