Thomas Scott

About

ThomasScott will allow players to explore the world through rotation, parkour and puzzle solving.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

80%

Audience ScoreBased on 10 reviews

monetization5 negative mentions

The game is fun to play and offers enjoyable gravity-based mechanics.
Levels increase in difficulty nicely, providing a good challenge as players progress.
It's a cheap game that can be surprisingly entertaining, especially for short play sessions.

The game suffers from poor graphics and lacks customization options, making it visually unappealing.
Instructions are unclear, leading to frustration, especially at higher levels.
There are concerns about the game's legitimacy due to allegations of being an asset flip and manipulation of reviews.

monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game is heavily criticized as a cash grab, with accusations of the developers engaging in asset flipping and using construction kit templates to create low-effort games. Reviewers highlight the presence of multiple versions of the same game on Steam, fake reviews from compromised accounts, and an unreasonably low price point, all contributing to the perception of a scam rather than a legitimate product.
- “These guys do nothing but copy asset store assets and game tutorials, fill out a few things, and dump them on Steam and into daily indie game bundles as cash grabs.”
- “Trying to get paid for someone else's game templates and assets... at best, this is shovelware; at worst, it's a scam/cash grab.”
- “The status of this thing as nothing but an asset/template flip/cash grab is cemented by the developers' prior history of asset flip/construction kit copy+paste jobs, the fake/compromised Steam accounts they used to write fake reviews, and the laughable $1 USD price tag for this garbage.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's graphics are criticized for their outdated retro pixel art style, reminiscent of decades-old designs, and lack customization options or resolution settings, leaving players unable to enhance the low-quality visuals.
- “A choice was made to use obsolete, decades-old retro pixel/MS Paint 'art' as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
- “There are no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There is no way for gamers to improve the low-quality graphics.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Gameplay is engaging and enjoyable, though it may take some time to fully grasp the mechanics. Once mastered, players find the experience rewarding and satisfying.
- “Short but sweet... once you get the mechanics down.”
- “The gameplay is incredibly engaging and keeps you on your toes.”
- “I love how intuitive the controls are, making it easy to jump right in.”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to enjoy.”
- “There are too many bugs that disrupt the flow of the game, leading to a poor experience.”
- “The mechanics are overly complicated, which detracts from the overall enjoyment.”