MOVEIT

+2

60%

Audience ScoreBased on 15 reviews

monetization4 negative mentions

The game is very short and can be completed in about 6-7 minutes, making it a quick experience.
Some players found the puzzles to be challenging and enjoyed the colorful interface.
It can serve as a simple time-killer for those looking for a brief distraction.

The game is criticized for being a low-quality asset flip with minimal effort put into its development.
There are significant issues with the graphics and controls, leading to a shallow gameplay experience.
Many players felt disappointed, stating that there are free games with more substance and content available.

monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of this game has been heavily criticized as a blatant cash grab, characterized by the use of copied assets and templates, leading to accusations of it being shovelware or a scam. Reviewers highlight the developers' history of similar practices, the suspicious nature of fake reviews, and the low price point as indicators of a lack of genuine effort or originality.
- “These guys do nothing but copy asset store assets and game tutorials, fill out a few things/stamp out basic levels using the construction kit templates, and dump them on Steam and into daily indie game bundles as cash grabs.”
- “Trying to get paid for someone else's game templates and assets... at best, this is shovelware; at worst, it's a scam/cash grab.”
- “The status of this thing as nothing but an asset/template flip/cash grab is cemented by the developers' prior history of asset flip/construction kit copy+paste jobs, the fake/compromised Steam accounts they used to write fake reviews (all with the same broken English), the laughable $1 USD price tag for this garbage, and the way they dumped it into daily indie game bundles immediately at launch.”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's graphics have received mixed reviews, with some players criticizing the use of outdated retro pixel art and the lack of options to adjust resolution or customize settings, while others appreciate the visuals as enjoyable and fitting for the gameplay experience.
- “Challenging puzzles, nice graphics, it's fun!”
- “A choice was made to use obsolete, decades-old retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
- “There are no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There's no way for gamers to improve the low-quality graphics.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The story is perceived as underwhelming, with some players feeling it fails to integrate meaningfully with the puzzles, leading to disappointment. While a few appreciate the simplicity of the narrative alongside the puzzles, overall expectations for a deeper or more engaging storyline seem to be low.
- “Simple puzzle with a nice story, do not expect more than that.”
- “The story claims to intertwine with the puzzles, but it ultimately fails to do so, leaving me quite disappointed.”
- “The narrative feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I expected a rich storyline, but instead, I found a predictable plot that didn't captivate me at all.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game has received mixed feedback; while the interface is praised for being interesting and colorful, some users find the music annoying enough to warrant turning it off.
- “Interesting and colorful interface, but I advise you to change the music; it's a little annoying, which is why I had to turn it off.”