Theme Park Simulator: Rollercoaster Paradise

About

Theme Park Simulator, amazing amusement park simulator game is here! Diferent simulators are waiting for you: Roller Coasters, Inverter, Bumper Cars, Tagada... Simulators for everyone!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Theme Park Simulator: Rollercoaster Paradise screenshot

53%

Audience ScoreBased on 15 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game provides a good practice opportunity for those interested in operating theme park rides.
Some rides, like the Techno Jump and Inverter, are well-designed and offer interesting gameplay.
Players have noted that the game has improved significantly from its mobile version.

The graphics and animations are disappointing, with many elements appearing low-quality and unrealistic.
The gameplay is limited and lacks depth, feeling more like a mobile game than a full PC experience.
There is a significant lack of customization options and information on how to operate the rides.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The graphics of the game have been criticized for their low quality and numerous flaws, particularly in shadow rendering and environmental realism, which detracts from the overall experience, especially for a simulation title where visuals are crucial. Many users feel that the graphics appear outdated and reminiscent of a mobile version, leading to a lack of immersion and engagement with the rides and attractions.
- “The graphics of the game draw me back and the rides themselves, because of their nature and designs, most are forgettable at least for me.”
- “Shadows often bug with humans at night time; they are not as high quality as they should be, especially for a simulation game where graphics are everything.”
- “In simulation games, graphics are essential!”
- “In my opinion, this game should not have been done this way, as on PC you can clearly see the graphic flaws apart from other issues.”
- “Shadows often bug with humans at night, and they are not as high quality as they should be, especially for a simulation game where graphics are everything. The surroundings not only seem unrealistic but also feel really artificial, despite the environment being nature/a forest!”
- “Do not expect a high-quality game, neither in rides nor attraction designs, nor high-quality graphics, as it seems imported from its mobile version.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The gameplay is minimal and primarily revolves around a simulation experience, akin to the ride mechanics found in RollerCoaster Tycoon games. While some users find the lack of traditional gameplay elements expected, others note that it feels almost non-existent.
- “The gameplay is nonexistent, but this is expected; it is a simulation game.”
- “This game tries to have gameplay going, or something similar.”
- “The gameplay amounts to the riding the rides section of RollerCoaster Tycoon games.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The music in the game is described as a carnival-like experience, enhancing the overall atmosphere, but players are frustrated by the inability to adjust the volume or customize the audio settings. Additionally, the lack of options for personalizing ride names, colors, and music further detracts from the experience. Overall, while the music adds a lively feel, its limitations hinder player enjoyment.
- “You guys gotta try to operate Amor Express with music on YouTube; it feels like a carnival ride and not a theme park one.”
- “The music and sound effects (human nonsensical shouting) are terrible, and you cannot modify the volume at all; you can only mute it completely.”
- “You are not able to change the ride name, letters on it, colors, or put custom music. The only customization available for all rides is the lighting colors, specifically the big spotlights at the side, mainly used for nighttime or flashing moments.”
- “Trying to operate the rides with music from YouTube feels more like a carnival ride than a theme park experience.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The stability of the game is criticized for its lack of detail in 3D attraction models and the unrealistic appearance and animations of human characters, which contribute to a robotic feel. Additionally, some on-ride cameras exhibit bugs and frame issues, undermining the overall immersion experience.
- “The 3D attraction models are not as detailed as they should be; humans look extremely artificial, and their animations are close to robotic. Some on-ride cameras can feel really buggy, as if frames are missing, which completely destroys immersion.”
- “The game frequently crashes, making it nearly unplayable at times. It's frustrating to lose progress due to stability issues.”
- “I experienced numerous glitches that caused the game to freeze, forcing me to restart. This significantly detracts from the overall experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users expressing frustration over spending money on games that were later abandoned or transitioned to free-to-play models, leading to feelings of regret and dissatisfaction.
- “I've seen some dumb cash grabs before, but wow... this was the worst thing I've ever spent money on. I bought Rainbow Six Siege and at least five games for over nine dollars each that all were abandoned or went free to play.”
- “The monetization in this game feels exploitative and designed solely to squeeze money out of players. It's disappointing to see such a great concept ruined by greed.”
- “I can't believe how much they charge for basic content. It feels like they are prioritizing profit over player experience, which is really frustrating.”