Skip to main content

The Elder Scrolls: Castles

The Elder Scrolls: Castles promises to put you in charge of your own castle and dynasty, and it certainly does, but managing your subjects, making rulings, crafting gear, and venturing outside to fight only to do all of the above again and again and again makes the new Elder Scrolls title lose its sheen sooner rather than later.
The Elder Scrolls: Castles Game Cover
62%Game Brain Score
gameplay, story
monetization, stability
65% User Score Based on 5,733 reviews
Critic Score 50%Based on 1 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneiPadMobile PlatformiPhone
The Elder Scrolls: Castles Game Cover

About

The Elder Scrolls: Castles is a single player casual role playing game with a fantasy theme. It was developed by Bethesda Game Studios and was released on September 28, 2023. It received neutral reviews from critics and mostly positive reviews from players.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles is a single-player fantasy RPG where you build and manage your dynasty and castle through the years. With good game mechanics, charming visuals, and compelling music, you’ll oversee subjects, customize your stronghold, and make impactful decisions—though the experience is often grinding, buggy, and interrupted by ads, it offers plenty of humor and emotional moments.

Skip User Reviews

65%
Audience ScoreBased on 5,733 reviews
gameplay100 positive mentions
monetization189 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun and engaging castle management experience with unique character interactions.
  • The graphics and art style are appealing, providing a charming aesthetic.
  • The decision-making mechanics add depth to gameplay, allowing players to influence the kingdom's dynamics.
  • The game frequently crashes, especially during key interactions like making rulings, leading to frustration.
  • Progression can feel slow and tedious, with many rewards locked behind a paywall, making it difficult for free-to-play players.
  • The aging mechanic causes characters to die off quickly, which can be discouraging for players who want to invest in their characters.
  • gameplay
    326 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the game has been widely compared to "Fallout Shelter," featuring similar mechanics but with added elements like character aging and decision-making. While many players appreciate the graphics and some unique features, they often criticize the repetitive nature, lack of depth, and aggressive monetization strategies that detract from the overall experience. Frequent crashes and performance issues further hinder enjoyment, leading to mixed feelings about the game's long-term engagement potential.

    • “Gameplay is fun and building is better than Fallout Shelter but the subscription is far too greedy for my liking.”
    • “The gameplay is solid so far, although it's a bit early to say long-term.”
    • “The interactions between subjects, the unique storylines, the details... it all feels well thought out while keeping the gameplay feeling organic and natural!”
    • “The game has a lot less freedom of gameplay than, let's say, Skyrim.”
    • “There's very little gameplay outside of waiting for timers and clicking off the 'offers' the shop spams you with at every opportunity, and it gets old fast.”
    • “The gameplay is just downright boring, and the character design is genuinely laughable.”
  • monetization
    311 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to the aggressive push for microtransactions and in-app purchases. While some players appreciate the absence of forced ads, they criticize the high prices and the frequent prompts for spending money, which detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game. Despite the option to play for free, the heavy reliance on monetization and the perceived lack of meaningful rewards for watching ads have left many feeling frustrated and disappointed.

    • “On the other hand, microtransactions are entirely optional, the game is generally improved on from Fallout Shelter and it is pretty... but I can't really recommend it.”
    • “I really hope the devs keep the monetization as fair as it is, as I think the current model is right where it needs to be for free-to-play.”
    • “This is a great fun game that yes has microtransactions, but you don't need them.”
    • “This game is a complete cash grab.”
    • “The monetization is excessive.”
    • “The overall gameplay and mechanics are decent, a good alternative to Fallout Shelter; however, in-app purchases are basically forced on you and very abundant.”
  • story
    260 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it lacking depth and variety. While some appreciate the initial setup and the potential for crafting personal narratives within their kingdoms, the repetitive quests and linear progression lead to a sense of stagnation, especially in the endgame. Overall, players express a desire for more engaging storylines, character customization, and meaningful choices that impact gameplay.

    • “The small story in the beginning is a great introduction to the roleplay aspect of owning a kingdom, and the evolving story that unfolds as you play.”
    • “The interactions between subjects, the unique storylines, the details... it all feels well thought out while keeping the gameplay feeling organic and natural!”
    • “If you have imagination and flair for writing a story, this is a good game... you can personally choose the fate of your dynasty.”
    • “There is almost no story and progression is very linear; even compared to Fallout Shelter.”
    • “Plot is nonexistent and quests are only if you want to advance your crafting.”
    • “The quests get to a point that you cannot go further without spending money, fulfilling orders eventually requires it.”
  • graphics
    250 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising the art style as cute and whimsical, while others criticize it for being outdated or lacking detail, often comparing it to older console graphics. Many users report performance issues, including lag and crashes, particularly when graphics settings are high, suggesting that optimization is needed. Overall, while there are elements of the graphics that some find appealing, the consensus indicates a need for improvement in both quality and performance.

    • “The art style is great and whimsical, and the castle-building is fine.”
    • “Amazing work on the graphics.”
    • “This game is amazing, from having great art style and gaming commands to even how the resources and NPC responses.”
    • “The graphics, animations, and overall game feel is just meh.”
    • “The graphics currently are a little PS1 era, which I'm assuming to be a symptom of early access, so I'm looking forward to seeing the quality increase significantly in time.”
    • “The graphics are terrible.”
  • stability
    219 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has been widely criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent crashes and freezes, particularly during key interactions like making rulings. While some players have experienced minimal issues, the overwhelming consensus is that the game is plagued by bugs and performance problems, making it difficult to enjoy for extended periods. Many users express disappointment, noting that despite the game's potential, its current state renders it nearly unplayable.

    • “It runs great and doesn't have many problems for a game that just released.”
    • “Amazingly fun, runs great.”
    • “I'd give it 4 stars but I docked 1 star because the game runs great on my ARM Chromebook (and phone).”
    • “The biggest issue I have is that the game consistently crashes/freezes during the starting of a ruler decision (when clicking on the card on the left for the first time to reveal choices and also when trying to select and move a choice, both have happened repeatedly). I'm currently pretty disappointed with the experience.”
    • “The game is buggy and impossible to even play.”
    • “It's a really good game, but when you go to rule sometimes it has a bit of a glitch where it freezes up and then you have to close it out and go back in.”
  • optimization
    77 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with players reporting frequent crashes, freezing, and significant performance issues across various devices, including high-end models. Many users express frustration over the game's tendency to overheat phones and drain battery life, while some note that even on low settings, the performance remains subpar. Although a few players have experienced smoother gameplay, the consensus is that substantial optimization improvements are urgently needed for a better overall experience.

    • “It is fun, is optimized well in my opinion and has a cute (though basic) 3D style.”
    • “There are some mechanics that definitely need fixing but the game runs smoothly overall.”
    • “Seems to have gotten some much-needed updates and improvements, and better performance.”
    • “Intermittent crashing, freezing, and performance issues are taking away from the overall experience of the game.”
    • “The game is constantly stuttering, freezing, and crashing; I can't keep it open for more than five seconds without it bugging out.”
    • “Poorly optimized; this game runs at 2-4fps even when set to the lowest setting.”
  • grinding
    69 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and repetitive, often leading to frustration and boredom. Many reviews highlight the slow progression, micromanagement tasks, and the need for real money to bypass grindy elements, which detracts from the overall enjoyment. While some appreciate the initial novelty, the lack of engaging content and the overwhelming grind quickly diminish interest in the game.

    • “The longer you get into it, the more you get pummeled with things that cost money or a lot of grinding, and it just stops being interesting within a couple of days because of it.”
    • “After about 7 days of play you hit a wall where progressing in the combat portion of the game demands either real cash or endless grinding.”
    • “It's slow and feels tedious while lacking any real charm or identity.”
  • music
    56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is widely praised for its charm, beauty, and ability to create a relaxing atmosphere, with many players noting its immersive quality that enhances gameplay. While some users express a desire for more variety or specific tracks from the Elder Scrolls series, the overall sentiment is that the soundtrack significantly contributes to the game's enjoyment. However, a few players have reported issues with sound quality and music-related bugs, which detract from the experience.

    • “The music is absolutely beautiful!!!”
    • “The music sets a relaxing atmosphere.”
    • “Music is amazing and the art style is great.”
    • “I'm confused by the limitation here... the Halloween update has made the sound output for the music very harsh.”
    • “I feel like the music is right on the edge of several lawsuits; I'm able to compare four songs closely to existing music.”
    • “Something is wrong with the music; it has static in it.”
  • humor
    34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with players enjoying the quirky character interactions, amusing dialogue, and humorous situations that arise from decision-making and character relationships. Many reviews note the game's ability to elicit laughter through its absurd scenarios, such as unexpected character traits and comical glitches, despite some criticism of its monetization and technical issues. Overall, the humor adds a lively and entertaining dimension to the gameplay, making it a fun experience for many players.

    • “You may marry anyone, which is hilarious.”
    • “The characters' dialogue can also be pretty funny to follow, and making decisions as king adds a nice touch of interaction with the world and people.”
    • “I accidentally made a child with the wrong argonian and the one I married was pissed off at me for like a year and randomly developed the volatile trait because of it, which was hilarious.”
  • emotional
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of the game is a mixed bag, with players experiencing both heartwarming moments and frustrating mechanics. While the charming music and engaging gameplay can draw players in for hours, issues like character emotional swings, bugs, and a demanding reward system detract from the overall enjoyment. Some players find the storyline touching, but others criticize the emotional management system and character design, leading to a sense of disconnection and frustration.

    • “Simple, fun, and heartwarming; it's full of charm and the music is wonderful. I turn this on when I get a free moment, and I suddenly realize it's dark out and it's been hours since I turned it on. It completely sucks you in, so fun you lose track of time. Great job, devs!”
    • “What a heartbreaking truth.”
    • “The music makes me want to cry; it's so good.”
    • “The story is heart touching.”
    • “The tutorial had a boring storyline that failed to engage me emotionally.”
    • “I found the emotional depth lacking; it didn't resonate with me at all.”
    • “The game tried to evoke emotions, but it felt forced and unconvincing.”
  • character development
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, reviews indicate that while the game offers some layers of character development with unique characteristics, it suffers from a lack of depth and variety in character design, leading to a sense of sameness among characters. Many players express disappointment with the simplistic and unoriginal character aesthetics, which detracts from the overall experience. The gameplay is described as straightforward but lacks the engaging character development found in other titles.

    • “Easy to pick up and play but has multiple layers of character development with different characteristics adding bonuses to certain areas.”
    • “Pretty straightforward and true to the genre with Mii-ish style character design.”
    • “Great fun, just not too many unique character designs surprisingly.”
    • “Game is solid, but could use more content like deeper character development or use of the castle yard.”
    • “Not a fan of the simple character designs either, everyone looks the same regardless of race.”
    • “Somewhat like Fallout Shelter but no tactics or character development involved, just a time suck.”
  • replayability
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the reviews present a mixed perspective on replayability. While some players appreciate the variety of options that enhance replay value, others criticize the limited replayability of combat missions and the rigid upgrade paths that hinder exploration and choice. A few users express hope for improvements to enhance the game's replay potential, drawing comparisons to titles like Fallout Shelter.

    • “The variety of options lends itself to replay value, not microtransaction value.”
    • “Great game! I believe it even has good replayability.”
    • “So far, I'm enjoying the game loop like Fallout Shelter, but it seems to have more replayability.”
    • “Combat missions have limited replay value and rewards.”
    • “Zero replayability.”
    • “Fallout Shelter but bad; 0 replay possibilities as you have to upgrade everything in the same locked order every time. I don't even know what the point of playing is... the illusion of choice and progress.”
  • atmosphere
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is highly praised, with attention to detail that rivals the Elder Scrolls series, complemented by relaxing music that enhances the immersive experience. Players feel immediately enveloped in the game's world, contributing to a strong sense of atmosphere that warrants top ratings.

    • “A lot of attention has been given to detail, and the atmosphere is right up there with what you would expect from an Elder Scrolls game.”
    • “The music sets a relaxing atmosphere.”
    • “You can also make the same type of game in a village atmosphere.”
    • “I never write reviews, but the atmosphere you're immediately enveloped in gets 5 stars.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy The Elder Scrolls: Castles

4h Median play time
4h Average play time
3-4h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 6 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like The Elder Scrolls: Castles
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

The Elder Scrolls: Castles is a casual role playing game with fantasy theme.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 4 hours playing The Elder Scrolls: Castles.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles was released on September 28, 2023.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles was developed by Bethesda Game Studios.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

The Elder Scrolls: Castles is a single player game.

Similar games include The Elder Scrolls: Blades, Assassin’s Creed Rebellion, Invincible: Guarding the Globe, Fallout Shelter, Crash Bandicoot: On the Run! and others.