The Culling 2
- July 10, 2018
- Xaviant
- 376h median play time
Even if the servers had enough players to start a round of The Culling 2, we wouldn't recommend it. This battle royale is a royale mess.
Get on Steam"The Culling 2" is a battle royale-style game where players fight to be the last person standing. The game features larger maps and more players than its predecessor, with a focus on fast-paced combat and strategic gameplay. However, it received mostly negative reviews due to a lack of content and numerous bugs at launch.
Reviews
- Some players appreciate the return of the announcer from the original game.
- The game runs smoothly without lag or disconnects, providing a stable experience.
- A few players found the gunplay enjoyable, noting that it felt good to control recoil.
- The game has a very low player base, making it difficult to find matches.
- It is criticized for being a poor clone of other battle royale games like PUBG and H1Z1, lacking the unique elements of the original Culling.
- Graphics and animations are considered subpar, with many players describing them as worse than the original game and even reminiscent of older consoles.
- graphics21 mentions
- 10 % positive mentions
- 57 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
The graphics of "The Culling 2" have been widely criticized, with many reviewers noting that they are significantly worse than its predecessor, often comparing them to outdated titles from the PlayStation 3 era or even earlier. Users describe the visuals as unpolished, with poor character and gun models, lackluster animations, and a general feeling of being rushed and uninspired. Overall, the graphical quality has led to disappointment, with many feeling it does not meet the standards expected of a 2018 release.
“Ori and the Blind Forest: Definitive Edition is a platformer with stunning visuals and Metroidvania elements.”
“For a title that was built in UE4, the graphical quality of the game feels like something from the PlayStation 3 era and lacks the feel of a title released in 2018 that's supposed to render at a quality demanded by the current battle royale gaming climate.”
“Graphics look like something from 2005; I'm pretty sure Battlefield 2 looked better.”
“The graphics of The Culling 2 are worse compared to its predecessor.”
“Graphics are worse than a mobile game; character/gun models/assets all look borrowed, and animations are terrible.”
“For a title that was built in UE4, the graphical quality of the game feels like something from the PlayStation 3 era and lacks the feel of a title released in 2018 that's supposed to render at a quality demanded by the current battle royale gaming climate.”
- gameplay19 mentions
- 21 % positive mentions
- 53 % neutral mentions
- 26 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the sequel has been widely criticized for its poor execution, lack of originality, and unpolished mechanics, leading many to label it as a disappointing clone of other battle royale games like PUBG and H1Z1. While some players appreciate certain mechanics and the introduction of helicopters, the overall experience is marred by bad graphics and a departure from the unique features that made the original game enjoyable. Many reviewers express that the gameplay feels stiff and lacks the depth and engagement expected from a modern battle royale title.
“The lore is deep and with cutting edge gameplay to boot.”
“The fact that there are multiple helicopters is really cool and a fun twist on conventional battle royale mechanics.”
“Did you like the skill-based gameplay which awarded savagery and punished meekness?”
“Gameplay is stiff, unpolished, and a blatant ripoff of PUBG and Fortnite.”
“No, the reason that The Culling 2 is a failure of a game in 2018 is due to the poor execution of the mechanics put into place.”
“Also, the whole city battle royale is terrible; the forest and bunker island from the original were cool, but parachutes are just annoying, the graphics are bad, and the general gameplay feels dodgy.”
- monetization10 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 10 % neutral mentions
- 90 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with reviewers expressing disappointment over its lack of originality and quality. Many feel that the game exploits the nostalgia of the original while failing to deliver a polished experience, relying heavily on ads and minimal new content. Overall, players advise against supporting the developers, viewing the game as a desperate attempt to profit from a saturated market.
“Thankfully, there are no loot box microtransactions (yet).”
“All in all this game is a cash grab and do not buy!”
“This is an obvious cash grab from the publishers milking out an already dehydrated cow.”
“I was somewhat excited to find out what this game was going to be like, because I loved the original...this turned out to be nothing but a cash grab. They tried utilizing the love of guns and lack of melee which was the original draw to this game. They didn't even make new cosmetics except beards, and just imported them from the first Culling and not even all of them. Melee is strong but it's not the same...guns feel like trash and movement and animations are poor. This was them grabbing what money they could before they finally went under. Do not...I repeat do not support Xaviant, they're liars and thieves, and they deserve nothing.”
- humor3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is characterized by its absurdly unrealistic guns and a unique, comedic approach to gameplay, which some players find entertaining despite the lack of variety in perks. Overall, it successfully combines fun and humor, making for an enjoyable experience.
“Guns are hilariously unrealistic.”
“You can still make a battle royale game that's different, funny, and fun to play.”
“Some perks seem hilariously overpowered, adding a humorous twist to the gameplay.”
- optimization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game's optimization is severely lacking, with users reporting poor graphics and performance issues even on high-end hardware, leading to a consensus that it may be one of the worst battle royale games available.
“Poor graphics, optimization, and overall gameplay mechanics make this a very good contender for the worst battle royale game ever created and released to the public.”
“Poor performance on high-end hardware (980 Ti & i7 2600k).”
- stability2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Users report that the game exhibits excellent stability, with no lag, disconnections, or interface glitches, contributing to a smooth gaming experience. This reliability enhances the overall enjoyment, especially when compared to other titles like PUBG, which are noted for their bugs despite a higher price point.
“The game is plagued by constant crashes and connectivity issues.”
“I experience frequent lag spikes that ruin the gameplay experience.”
“The interface is often unresponsive, making it difficult to navigate.”
- atmosphere1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 100 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The atmosphere of the game has been universally criticized, with users giving it a score of 0/10, indicating a complete lack of engaging or immersive elements.
“The atmosphere is completely lifeless and fails to engage the player.”
“There's a distinct lack of immersion; the world feels empty and uninspired.”
“The game's atmosphere is dull and forgettable, making it hard to stay invested.”
