Terracards

About

Terracards is a single player strategy game. It was developed by Pixel Purrfect and was released on November 7, 2023. It received positive reviews from players.

"Terracards" is a single-player strategy game where you manage and grow a inherited farm on a small island to pay off a large debt. Each card played represents different elements of the farm, from crops to animals to structures, and choosing the right card can maximize profits and efficiency. With grinding and careful planning, turn the desolate land into a thriving agrarian empire. The challenge is to generate items, sell them for cash, and invest wisely to expand the farm and chip away at the debt.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

87%

Audience ScoreBased on 714 reviews

gameplay26 positive mentions

grinding26 negative mentions

The game is very fun and every playthrough is different, providing a unique experience each time.
It features cute graphics and engaging gameplay that keeps players hooked, making it a great time killer.
The developer is responsive and frequently updates the game, showing commitment to improving the overall experience.

The game lacks a proper tutorial and clear explanations of mechanics, making it difficult for new players to understand how to succeed.
There are significant performance issues, especially in late-game scenarios where lag can make the game unplayable.
Players cannot remove or rearrange placed items, which can lead to frustrating situations where poor placements hinder progress.

gameplay
64 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
41%
54%
5%
The gameplay is characterized by a unique combination of simple mechanics that create a rich and engaging experience, though some players find the deckbuilding aspect underwhelming. While the game offers an addictive loop and charming visuals, it suffers from bugs and unclear mechanics that can disrupt the flow and lead to confusion. Overall, the gameplay is enjoyable and immersive, but improvements in quality of life features and bug fixes are needed for a smoother experience.
- “The charming illustrations and addictive gameplay immediately immerse you in this fascinating world.”
- “The art is gorgeous, there is a lot of fun complexity in the gameplay, and the music is catchy if simple.”
- “Fun addictive gameplay loop.”
- “Sometimes I get 3 essence rewards that will actually end my run if I take them, so I'm forced to skip, which is not very interactive gameplay.”
- “Also, it seems that many interactions have numerous exceptions that aren't described, which makes it hard to tell actual bugs from intended limitations to mechanics.”
- “Lots of the mechanics at play are simple, but you'll still spend your first two hours with the game totally clueless as to why you're going bankrupt so early.”
grinding
26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The grinding aspect of the game is criticized for being tedious, requiring players to perform basic tasks that should be automated, which detracts from the overall enjoyment. While it combines elements of roguelike deckbuilding and farming, it fails to deliver a satisfying farming experience, often feeling more like a management sim with limited specialization options. However, some players appreciate the unique play styles and synergies that emerge from the farming routes, suggesting potential for enjoyment if one is inclined towards resource management gameplay.
- “You can enjoy the game, but it's too tedious for me to play having to do very basic things the game should do automatically/by default.”
- “What you're left with here is a game that wants to be a roguelike deckbuilder, fails on both of those fronts spectacularly, so it just kinda becomes a farming themed management sim where the management is all about placing resources on a tile map and just kinda hoping it works out.”
- “It's impossible to, say, specialize in energy production - good farming sims let you do that, and I feel like this was a missed opportunity in the game's design.”
graphics
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
50%
14%
The graphics of the game are generally well-received, with many players appreciating the charming pixel art style and cutesy aesthetic that enhances the gameplay experience. However, some users expressed a desire for higher resolution graphics, noting that the current pixelation could be improved. There have been reports of graphical bugs affecting the sprites, but overall, the visuals contribute positively to the game's engaging atmosphere.
- “Terracards sports a cutesy aesthetic which masks a wickedly addictive cycle of hope and despair.”
- “Its captivating graphics and enjoyable gameplay kept me engaged in the gaming world.”
- “The graphics bugged out so all the sprites got cut in half diagonally :(”
- “I am fond of how the graphics look in this game despite being only pixel style graphics.”
- “Love the graphic and playstyle.”
music
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
61%
17%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some praising its catchy and relaxing qualities, while others find it repetitive and overly simplistic. Notably, the original trailer's brief loop does not reflect the full in-game soundtrack, which is expected to expand with more tracks. Overall, the music contributes positively to the game's atmosphere, despite some criticisms regarding its looping nature.
- “More tracks to come, plus a music player, so stay tuned!”
- “My friend composed music for the game, and I can't wait for more of his tracks to come!”
- “The art is gorgeous, there is a lot of fun complexity in the gameplay, and the music is catchy if simple.”
- “The music is horridly mind-melting and on a 2-minute loop.”
- “And the music?”
- “[b]note: I was graciously allowed to work on the OST for this absolute gem - as such, the 10-second loop you hear in the trailer no longer represents the music in-game.”
stability
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game currently suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent freezes and bugs that disrupt gameplay, such as unexpected screen blackouts and menu glitches. While players find the game fun and addictive, the overall experience is marred by these technical problems, indicating a need for further development and refinement.
- “It's fun, it's addictive but buggy beyond belief for me.”
- “In the current state, this game is buggy and/or feels buggy.”
- “Interesting concept, has potential, but it is still buggy (all crops died although had 32,000 water surplus).”
optimization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The game's optimization has seen significant improvements, with major bugs and performance issues largely resolved or addressed promptly by the developers. However, players note that late-game performance can still suffer, suggesting that further updates and quality-of-life enhancements could elevate the experience. Overall, while the game runs better than before, there is room for additional optimization, particularly at higher levels of play.
- “The game appears to run better overall, but I haven't been able to test late game performance.”
- “Some quality of life improvements with the interface, some performance improvements, and expanding out some more of the production lines can make this into a must-play game.”
- “I believe the game developers may improve the game's performance at these higher levels through updates or performance enhancements.”
- “Major performance issues once you get far enough.”
- “Nevertheless, I believe the game developers may improve the game's performance at these higher levels through updates or performance enhancements.”
- “Additionally, the game appears to run better overall, but I haven't been able to test late game performance.”
replayability
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
30%
30%
The game's replayability is a mixed bag; while some players find it simple and enjoyable with plenty of random elements that encourage multiple playthroughs, others feel it lacks long-term value due to limited content and a lack of goals to strive for. Overall, it appeals to those who appreciate its fun mechanics, but may not satisfy players seeking deeper engagement.
- “This is where the game gets its replayability.”
- “The game is simple, fun, and replayable!”
- “Definitely worth it if you're into this kind of game; limited content at the moment, but lots of replayability.”
- “No replay value since there's nothing to work towards.”
- “Plenty of RNG to make the game replayable... and sometimes frustrating.”
- “No replay value since there's nothing to work towards.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the humor in the game to be quirky and entertaining, particularly highlighting the amusing combination of funny gnomes and a chocolate factory that leads to absurd scenarios, such as an economic boom so large it causes the game to crash. The comedic elements, including unexpected sound effects, contribute to the overall lighthearted experience.
- “The only game where funny gnomes and a chocolate factory can cause an economic boom so big that the game crashes.”
- “It made a funny loud noise.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Users express a strong desire for a more developed story or an endless mode, indicating that the current narrative may be lacking depth or content. Overall, the anticipation for an enhanced storytelling experience is a common sentiment among players.
- “I would heavily recommend this game; I'm desperately waiting for a story or endless mode.”