Task is to Survive

About

Task is to Survive is a single player survival shooter game with a violence theme. It was developed by Laush Dmitriy Sergeevich and was released on October 31, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Task is to Survive - Is a first person shooter. You play as a soldier and you were sent by helicopter to the infected object in which there are a huge number of dangerous zombies. Do you have a special mission - to kill as many zombies before the time, until you die!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

52%

Audience ScoreBased on 27 reviews

optimization2 positive mentions

monetization3 negative mentions

Runs smoothly with low system requirements and small file size.
Simple, straightforward gameplay suitable for casual or achievement hunters.
Has a basic weapon variety and easy-to-obtain achievements.

Extremely repetitive gameplay with only one map and limited weapon options.
Poor quality graphics, wonky hitboxes, and technical issues such as lack of sound effects and no control customization.
Accused of being an asset flip with plagiarized content and unethical developer practices including review manipulation.

graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The graphics receive mixed feedback, with some praising the detailed and clear visuals, while others find them bland or reminiscent of early PS1-era games. Despite some criticism for their simplicity, the graphics are generally considered fitting for the game's setting.
- “This game defines triple-A gameplay with graphics so good I can see every pixel.”
- “An excellent game with good graphics, I advise you not to bypass the game.”
- “Even though the visuals are bland, they work well given the setting and objective of the game.”
- “The graphics remind you of something you played on the PS1, with rough-around-the-edges visuals that feel bareboned.”
- “Visuals are bland, resembling something from the PS1 era.”
- “Bland visuals.”
gameplay
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
The gameplay offers a solid AAA experience with enjoyable enemy variety and an engaging survival focus, though it can feel repetitive and somewhat barebones. While graphics and hitbox issues detract slightly, many find the gameplay charming and compelling despite its rough edges.
- “This game is better than Dustborn and Concord; this is the definition of AAA gameplay, and the graphics are so good I can see every pixel.”
- “The enemy design and grouping switch up a bit the further you progress, but generally speaking, the gameplay doesn't deviate much from wave 1.”
- “Left 4 Dead 2 has better graphics, but the gameplay in Task is to Survive is superior; I can't explain it.”
- “The enemy design and grouping change slightly as you progress, but overall the gameplay remains very similar to the initial waves.”
- “The gameplay feels quite barebones, with enemy hitboxes being inconsistent and it being difficult to maneuver your character when surrounded.”
- “The gameplay is repetitive, both in terms of visuals and mechanics.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization is heavily criticized for being unethical, involving plagiarism and asset flipping without credit to original creators. Users highlight a pattern of deceptive practices, including fake reviews and multiple accounts, framing the game as a low-quality cash grab.
- “It's important to note that the developers did not credit any of the artists and actual game developers who created the assets. This is plagiarism as well as a cash grab shovelware.”
- “Laush Dmitriy Sergeevich/Falco Software have shown a repeated pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as cheap, nasty cash grabs through closely linked or alternate accounts.”
- “The reviews are all written in either Russian or broken English, appear almost simultaneously shortly after the game launched on Steam, and the accounts consistently write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs or scams.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The story centers on a simple survival mission where players are dropped into a forest to kill zombies until they inevitably die. It offers a straightforward, action-focused premise but lacks depth, feeling like a slightly improved version of previous similar games.
- “The mission is to kill as many zombies as possible before the time runs out or until you die.”
- “Feels like an improved version of the Slaughtering Grounds (2014) and The Last Mission (2017).”
- “The story is a helicopter drops you in the middle of a forest and your task is to survive (spoiler alert: you won't survive for long).”
- “Verdict: feels like an improved version of The Slaughtering Grounds (2014) and The Last Mission (2017), but that's not saying much...”
- “Do you have a special mission - to kill as many zombies before the time runs out, until you die!”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is well-optimized, running smoothly without performance issues. Users generally experience stable and fluid gameplay.
- “Runs smoothly.”
- “Runs smoothly...”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the music in the game obnoxiously bad and repetitive, contributing to a negative audio experience overall.
- “The music is obnoxiously bad and repetitive.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is generally easy, with achievements that require some repetitive tasks but are not overly demanding.