Tabletopia

About

Tabletopia is a single player and multiplayer casual role playing game. It was developed by Tabletopia and was released on November 30, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Tabletopia is a digital platform for playing and creating board games, offering a realistic experience with no AI enforcing rules. Its diverse catalog includes popular games like Champions of Midgard, The Shipwreck Arcana, Hansa Teutonica, Sub Terra, Burgle Bros, and Tuscany, supporting solo, hotseat, and online multiplayer modes. Users can also create and promote their own board games within the platform.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

61%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,045 reviews

graphics17 positive mentions

stability24 negative mentions

Tabletopia offers a vast library of board games, allowing players to try out many titles for free before committing to purchases.
The platform provides a unique opportunity to play with friends remotely, making it a great option for social gaming during times of physical distancing.
The interface is visually appealing and user-friendly, with many games featuring high-quality graphics and components.

The subscription model can be frustrating, as many popular games are locked behind a paywall, limiting access for casual players.
The platform suffers from connectivity issues and bugs, leading to crashes and frustrating gameplay experiences.
Players often report a lack of community engagement, making it difficult to find others to play with, especially during off-peak hours.

graphics
33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
52%
39%
9%
The graphics in Tabletopia are widely praised for their high quality and aesthetic appeal, often described as raising the bar in the digital board game genre. Users appreciate the beautiful visuals and smooth performance, although some note limitations in customization options and the need for higher-end hardware to fully enjoy the experience. Overall, the game offers a visually immersive experience that closely resembles playing a physical board game.
- “Raising the bar in the digital board game genre, Tabletopia impresses with its stellar graphics and vast game library.”
- “The graphics are very well done and it feels like playing a board game.”
- “Outstanding graphics and visuals.”
- “Anyone with a lower-end PC or laptop will not be able to run this (despite its minimal graphics requirement).”
- “You definitely have to fiddle with your graphics to get them to respond the way you want, but when they work, they work really well.”
- “At the point of typing out this review, when playing in the room there are only 3 options to choose from in the graphics settings menu: high, medium, and low.”
gameplay
32 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
57%
9%
The gameplay experience is mixed, with some users praising the smooth mechanics and enjoyable sandbox elements, while others criticize the lack of meaningful interactions and gameplay loops. Although the interface and ease of use are highlighted positively, several reviews point out that the overall gameplay feels limited compared to other similar titles, leading to a less engaging experience for some players.
- “✨ Smooth and satisfying mechanics that make even setup enjoyable.”
- “I like the sandbox-like gameplay, where you can play how you like.”
- “Very smooth gameplay.”
- “There are no gameplay loops in this software, no 'gameplay', no meaningful game-like interaction.”
- “This game sucks, it lacks good games like Dungeons and Dragons, it has terrible gameplay, literally no one plays it unless you invite someone, and it's a huge waste of time.”
- “This game is worse than a browser game; try searching for chess games online on Google and you will find a more organized and legitimate gameplay than this pile of waste.”
stability
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has been widely criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs, desync issues, and a generally clunky interface across both the Steam and browser versions. While some players find the platform enjoyable despite these issues, many express frustration over the persistent instability and the lack of significant improvements over time. Overall, the game's performance is seen as a major drawback, overshadowing its extensive library of games.
- “Game is extremely buggy, desyncs happen frequently, very limited control options for the user.”
- “It's great to have as an option, but Tabletopia is just so buggy and difficult to use, and it's been out so long that there's really no excuse.”
- “The steam version freezes, it just sits on the loading page and does nothing.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect received a mixed response, with a rating of 6, indicating that while some players found it engaging, others felt it lacked depth or coherence. Overall, the narrative may appeal to certain audiences but does not universally resonate.
optimization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with users reporting significant performance issues, particularly with the Steam version, which is plagued by bugs and crashes. Additionally, the interface is criticized for being user-unfriendly, detracting from the overall experience. However, some users note that the game has a polished appearance and an 'adult' aesthetic.
- “Overall polished, 'adult' look and feel, and optimization.”
- “There are coin miners out there that use less of your computer's performance.”
- “Steam version is bugged and has huge performance issues as well as constant crashing lately.”
- “Bad interface, optimization problems, not user-friendly HUD, and not many games.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The game's replayability is currently hindered by a lack of players and unclear limitations on mobile play, making it difficult to find opponents. However, there is potential for increased replay value if the community grows with future subscriptions, which could enhance the overall gaming experience.
- “The Kickstarter implementations feel a little more playable on Tabletopia.”
- “The biggest thing plaguing it so far is the lack of players; it's hard to find people to play with at this time, and that makes it hard to be a game to just keep playing. Hopefully, the gamer base booms when the subscriptions set in, as that will really add lots of replay value if the community is large.”
- “The biggest thing plaguing it so far is the lack of players; it's hard to find people to play with at this time, and that makes it difficult to keep playing. Hopefully, the gamer base booms when the subscriptions set in, as that will really add a lot of replay value if the community is large.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized by its lighthearted, slapstick moments that encourage laughter among friends, while also incorporating elements of dark humor that appeal to a specific audience. Players appreciate the blend of fun and cheekiness, making it accessible and enjoyable for various tastes.
- “I vaguely remember slapping stuff around on the table and laughing at it with my friends, and that was a nice time.”
- “The funny thing is that you can cheat like in the real world.”
- “Game of Brian is an easy-to-learn game for people with a dark sense of humor.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be frustrating and time-consuming, with some noting that it can feel tedious and lead to long load times. Overall, the experience is described as laborious, prompting some to suggest alternative options.
- “This 'game' is terrible; nothing works, creating a game is tedious and takes forever to process. Do yourself a favor and get Tabletop Simulator instead.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “This has already been mentioned, but the load times can be a little tedious sometimes.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
67%
The monetization system is clearly outlined in the advertisements, indicating that players are aware of the potential costs involved before engaging with the game.
- “The monetization system is fair and doesn't feel intrusive, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “I appreciate how the monetization options are optional and don't hinder gameplay; you can still progress without spending.”
- “The game offers a balanced monetization approach, providing value for purchases while ensuring that free players can still have a great experience.”
- “The monetization system is frustrating and feels exploitative.”
- “It is in the advertisement, so you can't say they didn't warn you.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Reviewers highlight the game's atmosphere as highly immersive and effective, noting that it successfully introduces many innovative elements that enhance the overall experience.
- “All very atmospheric and efficient, and most importantly - a lot of firsts.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the tactile experience of gaming, highlighting a sense of relief and joy in returning to physical interactions after the isolation of the pandemic. This aspect underscores the importance of shared experiences in gaming and the emotional impact of re-engaging with others in a physical space.