Tabletop Playground

About

"Tabletop Playground" is a physics-based digital board game platform that allows players to create and customize their own board game designs with realistic 3D pieces. The game features online multiplayer, AI opponents, and a variety of built-in games, providing a social and interactive board game experience. Players can also import and export custom game designs, fostering a creative and engaged community.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Co-Op Team up with friends to complete levels or missions together
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

88%

Audience ScoreBased on 66 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

optimization3 negative mentions

Tabletop Playground offers a more streamlined and intuitive editing experience compared to Tabletop Simulator, making it easier for users to create and manage their games.
The game features better graphics and performance than Tabletop Simulator, providing a smoother gameplay experience.
The developers are highly responsive and actively engaged with the community, consistently implementing user feedback and improving the game.

The game currently has a limited selection of available games and mods, which may disappoint players looking for a larger library.
The user interface can be less intuitive than its competitor, making it harder for new users to navigate and access features.
The player base is significantly smaller than that of Tabletop Simulator, which affects the availability of multiplayer games and community content.

optimization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
Overall, users praise the optimization of the tabletop engine, highlighting its reliable performance, smooth operation, and superior editing tools compared to competitors like Tabletop Simulator. Many note that it handles complex games better and supports more players per table, making it a preferred choice for tabletop gaming. The active development and community support further enhance its appeal, contributing to a more polished and efficient experience.
- “Performance is better, development and support is active and helpful, more players can join per table, and scripting is a breeze.”
- “I've been incredibly frustrated with the latter as performance is so bad I can't even run halfway complex games on my 2.4 GHz i9 16" MacBook Pro.”
- “The quality and performance of Tabletop Playground is miles ahead of Tabletop Simulator and is catching up on the other fronts.”
- “It has more features, runs more smoothly, it's better optimized.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The graphics of the game are highly praised, with users noting significant improvements over Tabletop Simulator, particularly in lighting and overall visual quality. Built on Unreal Engine 4, the game features snappy controls and an impressive physics engine, contributing to a visually appealing and engaging gameplay experience.
- “Additionally, its lighting and graphics engine is awesome.”
- “Built on Unreal Engine 4; graphically and as a physics simulator, it looks way better than Tabletop Simulator in my opinion.”
- “Snappy controls, good graphics, and fun gameplay.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users consistently praise the software for its superior stability, noting it is significantly less buggy and faster compared to competitors, including tabletop simulation alternatives.
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
150%
The gameplay is characterized by snappy controls and appealing graphics, offering a fun experience that feels reminiscent of tabletop simulators, albeit with more restrictions. Players familiar with Board Game Arena may find this game particularly enjoyable.
- “Snappy controls, good graphics, and fun gameplay.”
- “Controls are similar to Tabletop Simulator but are more focused on gameplay; if you are coming from Board Game Arena, you might enjoy this a lot.”
- “The controls are similar to a tabletop simulator but are more restricted in terms of gameplay; if you're coming from Board Game Arena, you might enjoy this a lot.”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to enjoy the experience.”
- “There are too many bugs that disrupt the gameplay, leading to a lot of unnecessary interruptions.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
The developer plans to implement monetization in the future, but this approach creates a disconnect between the game and players, requiring an additional account and a separate website for transactions.
- “The developer assures that monetization will be supported in the future, providing players with ongoing opportunities to engage with the game.”
- “The monetization model is designed to be fair and transparent, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend.”
- “Future updates promise to enhance the monetization experience, ensuring that players have access to valuable content without compromising gameplay.”
- “The developer claims that monetization will be supported in the future, but it creates a separation between the game and the player, requiring an additional account and an extra website.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, making it difficult for players to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
- “I find the monetization practices frustrating, as they often prioritize profit over player experience.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game deviates from traditional expectations, offering a unique sound that may not resonate with all players.
- “The music isn't quite what you're used to.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and lacks variety.”
- “The audio quality is subpar, making it hard to enjoy the music.”