SUPER DISTRO

About

SUPER DISTRO is a single player arcade action adventure game. It was developed by KITATUS STUDIOS and was released on July 22, 2015. It received negative reviews from players.

"Super Distro" is a farming simulation game where players manage their own farm and grow crops, raise animals, and build structures. With a variety of customization options and a dynamic weather system, players must balance their time and resources to create a successful farm. The game also features a day-night cycle and multiple seasons, adding an extra layer of realism to the farming experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

26%

Audience ScoreBased on 389 reviews

story6 positive mentions

music24 negative mentions

The game offers a retro aesthetic that pays homage to classic 2D platformers, which some players may appreciate.
For those who enjoy challenging gameplay, the game provides an intense difficulty that can be rewarding for dedicated players.
The game includes Steam achievements, which can be appealing for achievement hunters.

The controls are unresponsive and clunky, making the gameplay frustrating and difficult for the wrong reasons.
There is a lack of checkpoints, which leads to repetitive gameplay and can make progress feel tedious and unfair.
The graphics and music are poorly designed, contributing to an overall negative experience that detracts from the gameplay.

music
50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
42%
48%
The music in the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players describing it as repetitive, grating, and irritating, often leading them to mute it entirely. While a few users found the soundtrack enjoyable, the majority felt it detracted significantly from the overall experience, with some even comparing it to the sound of a cat rolling on a keyboard. Overall, the music is seen as a major flaw, contributing to a frustrating gameplay experience.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- “The soundtrack is a bop.”
- “I was lucky enough to get this as a gift from a friend and I have to say, never has a gift brought me this much joy, truly a gaming masterpiece. The sound and music is brilliant, rivaling the old classics like Mega Man. The music was so good that my simple mind couldn't handle it resulting in a headache, but this I can only blame on myself. How could I have known the music would be of such an epic caliber?”
- “The music is repetitive and annoying.”
- “The first level music is one of the worst songs I’ve ever heard.”
- “I'm going to need therapy after listening to the music from the first level for 20 minutes.”
graphics
48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
59%
35%
The graphics of the game have received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users describing them as poor, uninspired, and lacking a coherent art style. While some appreciate the retro aesthetic as a homage to classic 2D platformers, the majority find the visuals to be ugly and reminiscent of placeholder graphics. Overall, the graphical quality is seen as a significant detractor from the gaming experience.
- “Retro aesthetic: the pixelated graphics and nostalgic feel are a decent homage to classic 2D platformers like Mega Man and Super Mario Bros 2.”
- “Gameboy graphic is kinda cute.”
- “+ graphics are 100% okay (for that price)”
- “Music is at the same level as your cat rolling on your keyboard; the graphics are ugly. I don't understand how it took the studio 3 years to develop this garbage of a game.”
- “This one is particularly bad with very low quality graphics that don't really look like either 8 or 16-bit era graphics, so the result is they're just really bad graphics.”
- “First of all, the graphics are quite ugly and I don't mean in a cool retro way; the game is just ugly.”
gameplay
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
48%
33%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being repetitive, clunky, and frustrating, with many players noting a steep difficulty curve that feels more punishing than challenging. Issues such as buggy controls, uninspired level design, and a lack of engaging mechanics contribute to a negative experience, leading to a consensus that the game fails to deliver enjoyable or innovative gameplay. Overall, players express disappointment, feeling that the game does not justify its difficulty and lacks the fundamental qualities that make platformers enjoyable.
- “Platformers of all ilk live and die (no pun intended) due to their gameplay.”
- “A 'hard-as-nails' game, as this purports to be, can be excused if it has fine gameplay, and the player knows that they died due to their mistake.”
- “This game makes me angry due to you will die every minute, but I really enjoyed the Mega Man/Mario feel gameplay.”
- “The steep difficulty curve makes it unnecessarily punishing, and the gameplay feels like a frustrating grind.”
- “Gameplay is appalling... the developer uses 'difficulty' as a selling point when really, it's just bad level design coupled with really unresponsive, laggy, floaty controls, which is the last thing anyone looks for in a twitch platformer.”
- “The gameplay is boring and repetitive, controls are clunky even on a controller, and the enemies are uninspiring.”
story
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
31%
31%
The reviews reflect a mixed reception regarding the story aspect of various games. While some players appreciate rich lore and engaging narratives, others criticize certain titles for lacking meaningful plots and delivering mundane or poorly executed storylines. Overall, the quality of storytelling varies significantly across different games, with some being praised as masterpieces and others deemed disappointing or non-existent.
- “Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “Super good game; the controls are tight, not to mention the lore and story is rich.”
- “Best storyline 10/10.”
- “Nevertheless, I started a new game and was greeted with a rather mundane story, where a kid is sick of today's games as they are too easy, and plans to make a hard one that'll make gamers 'rage.' I try to skip the cutscene, and up pops a little 'press A to skip' alert.”
- “Overall, the game is crappy, the story is lacking... well, stories I guess... and I'm not raging because of me dying repeatedly, I'm raging because of the graphics of this game!”
- “There appears to be no real story and the graphics are of bad quality.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with users reporting numerous bugs and glitches that significantly detract from the gameplay experience. While some players experienced no issues, the overall consensus highlights a poorly designed and unstable game that feels frustratingly unreliable, especially given its price point.
- “This game was one of the worst experiences I have ever had. The gameplay is so buggy that not dying feels like RNG, and with the levels being so long and difficult, it takes all the joy out of it. If it was free, it might be okay, but to have paid for this is horrible.”
- “You know it's a bad sign when the game looks like a terrible, buggy, poorly designed mess in the trailer on the page made by the developer to highlight the game.”
- “This game is honestly super buggy.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
60%
Overall, the game's optimization has received positive feedback, with many players reporting smooth performance and minimal issues. Some users noted minor delays in enemy loading, likely a trade-off for maintaining high performance, but these did not significantly detract from the experience.
- “The only thing I noticed was that it took a few seconds for some enemies to load (which was probably done to keep the performance as high as possible).”
- “First of all, congrats on the optimization.”
- “I've heard some people had issues with the performance of the levels, but I didn't have any real problems with that.”
- “The only thing I noticed was that it took a few seconds for some enemies to load, which was probably done to keep the performance as high as possible.”
- “Graphics, optimization, music, considered level design, gameplay has the sense?”
- “First of all, congrats for the optimization.”
humor
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's humor is initially engaging, with players finding amusement in its absurd deaths and challenging gameplay, but many feel that the comedic elements quickly fade after the introduction. While some appreciate the humor derived from the game's bugs and controls, others believe it lacks sustained comedic value.
- “This is a complicated game, mainly for its awful controls... it has many bugs, and at times you die in so many absurd ways that it's just hilarious.”
- “All together it was a really funny game and I liked the challenge behind it!”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
Players have mixed feelings about grinding, with some finding it tedious but manageable, while others experience it as both tedious and challenging. A few users note that grinding can be difficult without feeling overly repetitive. Overall, the grinding aspect varies in perception, balancing between tedium and difficulty.
- “That's difficult, but not tedious.”
- “That's tedious, but not difficult.”
- “That's tedious and difficult.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews suggest that the game's monetization strategy reflects traditional arcade sensibilities, potentially indicating a reliance on microtransactions or in-game purchases that may not align with modern gaming expectations.
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive and detracts from the overall experience.”
- “It seems like every feature is locked behind a paywall, making it frustrating to enjoy the game without spending money.”
- “The constant push for in-game purchases disrupts the flow and enjoyment of gameplay.”