Skip to main content

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS Game Cover
88%Game Brain Score
graphics, story
monetization, stability
88% User Score Based on 3,626 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneiPadMobile PlatformiPhone
Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS Game Cover

About

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS is a single player casual shooter game. It was developed by Brayang Studio and was released on September 27, 2016. It received positive reviews from players.

3D shooter game with excellent graphics, many missions with different mode.

Skip User Reviews

88%
Audience ScoreBased on 3,626 reviews
graphics235 positive mentions
monetization6 negative mentions

  • The game has good graphics, sound effects, and immersive storylines that make it enjoyable and addictive to play.
  • It offers a variety of weapons, missions, and gameplay modes including offline play, appealing to fans of shooter and war games.
  • Controls are generally smooth and the game is considered a good time killer with plenty of action and challenging targets.
  • There is a prevalent issue where weapons or UI elements overlap the equip and purchase buttons, preventing players from equipping or buying new guns.
  • Progression bugs such as inability to claim rewards, game crashes, and lost save data upon updates frustrate players and hinder gameplay experience.
  • In-game economy is criticized for costly weapons and insufficient rewards, making it hard to afford upgrades without spending real money or excessive grinding.
  • graphics
    274 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's graphics are widely praised for being impressive, clear, and enjoyable, often described as realistic and well-suited for an offline FPS experience with good control and smooth gameplay. Some users feel the graphics could be improved further, especially regarding weapon visuals and environmental details, but overall, the visual quality is considered a strong point of the game. A few reviews mention minor issues like lag or crashes, but these do not overshadow the generally positive reception of the graphics.

    • “Flawless, great graphics, love the artillery.”
    • “Great game, the graphics are decent, good even considering the size, controls are good and kills it when it comes to gameplay, great offline sci-fi FPS, highly recommend, keep it up developers!”
    • “Graphics are superb, smooth, no lags, and the gun sights are spot on.”
    • “Poor gameplay, poor graphics, boring, obviously pay to win anyway.”
    • “The game is lagging, the graphics are terrible, the controls are poor.”
    • “Waste of time, no proper graphics.”
  • story
    58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story of the game is generally praised for being interesting and supported by good graphics and varied missions, including a zombie mode. However, players note some issues like short mission lengths, repetitive gameplay, and limited storyline progression beyond chapter 5. Additionally, technical problems such as freezing, reward claiming glitches, and difficulties with upgrades sometimes hinder story experience.

    • “The graphics, the storylines, the levels, the firearms, the supplies and the game plots!”
    • “Great sci-fi shooter great graphics good storyline”
    • “The graphics and story line are good but there is too much ad”
    • “I'm at my last chapter and I can't continue because after a mission I can't claim any reward and the game gets stuck.”
    • “Can't even claim reward after tutorial mission.”
    • “This game is really frustrating, keeps hanging after a mission then gun equipping is not working, you guys should work on it.”
  • gameplay
    26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is widely praised for being smooth, fun, and engaging, especially as an offline sci-fi FPS with good controls and mission variety. Users appreciate the fast-paced action and cover shooter mechanics but suggest improvements like adding more missions, guns, and interactive elements to enhance depth. Overall, the gameplay is considered a strong highlight of the game, with some room for refinement.

    • “Great game with good controls and excellent gameplay; a highly recommended offline sci-fi FPS.”
    • “Very good cover shooter gameplay with smooth mechanics.”
    • “Nice gameplay with cool missions and enjoyable gun variety, though more purchasable guns would be a great addition.”
    • “Poor gameplay, poor graphics, boring, obviously pay to win anyway.”
    • “Needs improvements in gameplay and graphics.”
    • “With a little more work in the graphics and gameplay mechanics (more real guns and 3d objects to interact with), this game has the potential to become a true gem!”
  • monetization
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Monetization in the game is generally well-received, with praise for minimal ads and reasonable in-app purchases that do not feel greedy. Some players appreciate the option to earn rewards through gameplay rather than paying, while a few report issues with purchasing or overwhelming ads. Overall, the balance between ads and monetization is considered good by most users.

    • “That won't happen without real money or, literally, days of reward ads.”
    • “I can't buy the in-app purchase; I can't buy any gold, it immediately shows buy failed.”
    • “It has good graphics but so many ads.”
  • stability
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game experiences notable stability issues, especially after level 3, with glitches causing players to get stuck. Recent updates have introduced or worsened these bugs, impacting the overall gameplay experience.

    • “The tutorial itself is buggy.”
    • “From level 1 to 3 is okay, but after level 3 there are glitches and I am stuck on level 4.”
    • “Used to be one of my favorite games but now the updates have caused glitches.”
  • optimization
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game generally offers good optimization, allowing it to run smoothly on most Android devices. However, some users have encountered issues with buying and equipping items, indicating room for performance improvements and further optimization.

    • “The optimization of the game is actually good.”
    • “I appreciate the fact that the devs made optimizations to the game; you can play on virtually any Android.”
    • “Someone can't buy and equip guns from the craft and store; fix it for better performance.”
  • music
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed feedback, with some finding the soundtrack intense or "brain busting," while others note the lack of separate controls for music and sound effects, and request an option to turn off the music for a better experience.

    • “The soundtrack is brain-busting.”
    • “Graphics are good with an okay soundtrack.”
    • “Everything is good but there is no option to turn off music; if added, I will rate you 5 stars.”
    • “Only one control for SFX and music.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS

3h Median play time
3h Average play time
3-3h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS is a casual shooter game.

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS is available on Phone, iPad, iPhone, Tablet and others.

On average players spend around 3 hours playing Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS.

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS was released on September 27, 2016.

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS was developed by Brayang Studio.

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Strike Back: Elite Force - FPS is a single player game.

Similar games include Elite Killer: SWAT, Zombie Sniper War 3 - Fire FPS, Battleops | Offline Gun Game, Brothers in Arms™ 3, Zombie Frontier 3: Sniper FPS and others.