Skip to main content

Streamer Life Simulator

75%Game Brain Score
gameplay, humor
graphics, stability
75% User Score Based on 4,000 reviews

Platforms

PCPCiPhoneiPhoneWindowsWindowsMobile PlatformMobile PlatformiPadiPadPhonePhoneTabletTablet

About

"Streamer Life Simulator" allows you to rise to fame as a popular streamer, starting from scratch and improving your character and equipment. Stream games, interact with followers, and earn money to upgrade your setup and buy new games. Complete additional tasks and interactions in your environment to earn extra income, and take care of pets for added fun.

Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
Streamer Life Simulator screenshot
+6

75%
Audience ScoreBased on 4,000 reviews
gameplay38 positive mentions
graphics50 negative mentions

  • The game is surprisingly addictive and fun, with a lot of potential for improvement.
  • It offers a unique experience of managing a streamer's life, including various activities like bitcoin mining and gaming.
  • Despite its bugs, many players find enjoyment in the gameplay and appreciate the humor in its execution.
  • The game is riddled with bugs that can lead to lost progress and frustrating gameplay experiences.
  • Graphics and mechanics are poorly executed, making the game feel unfinished and clunky.
  • There has been a lack of updates from the developers, leading to concerns about the game's future and overall quality.
  • graphics
    166 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many reviewers describing them as outdated, clunky, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles or even earlier. Numerous comments highlight poor optimization, frequent graphical glitches, and a lack of polish, making the game visually unappealing and often unplayable on lower-end systems. While some players appreciate the gameplay, they express a strong desire for significant improvements in the graphical quality and overall user interface.

    • “The performance and optimization is just as nice as the graphics.”
    • “Improvements in graphics, user interface design, and technical stability are also crucial to enhance the overall gaming experience.”
    • “I personally liked the game, it's atmosphere, graphics.”
    • “Graphic quality is never usually something that can make or break a game for me...but this game looks like it was put together by a 5 year old who just learned how to make games.”
    • “The graphics are barely acceptable by PlayStation 2 standards, the gameplay is not fun, and there are spelling and grammar errors everywhere.”
    • “Genuinely this game is not fun, the graphics are poor and so are the character interactions, dialogue and storyline... genuinely not worth more than £5.”
  • gameplay
    166 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of this title is widely criticized for being unfinished, buggy, and lacking depth, with many players reporting frustrating mechanics, particularly with driving and AI. While some find the core concept engaging, the repetitive nature and technical issues detract significantly from the overall experience, leading to a consensus that the game requires substantial improvements to be enjoyable. Overall, the gameplay is seen as the weakest aspect, marred by glitches and a lack of meaningful content.

    • “Loved this game until after 23 hours of gameplay.”
    • “Its a perfect mix of complex and simple gameplay that's both fun to play and makes you feel smart too.”
    • “Super addicting gameplay loop and I haven't even made it out of the first house.”
    • “I cannot in good conscience recommend this 'game.' This is an unfinished, buggy project that has atrocious visuals, mechanics, AI, collisions, etc. It may have been released in 2020, but it's as clunky as something that was developed in 1998.”
    • “The gameplay itself is rather slow and monotonous, the overall experience is littered with bugs like the car consistently getting stuck, the poor driving mechanics, the awful collision, and the fact the supposed tutorial leaves so much information about events, jobs, and items in the game just makes the game more frustrating than fun.”
    • “It's riddled with glitches, like lost progress, collision issues, annoying NPCs, convoluted game mechanics, and pathetic implementation of half-baked concepts.”
  • stability
    138 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous players reporting frequent glitches, lag spikes, and crashes that significantly hinder gameplay. Many describe it as a "buggy mess" that feels unfinished and abandoned, leading to lost progress and frustrating experiences. While some find it entertaining despite the issues, the overwhelming consensus is that the game requires substantial improvements to its stability before it can be recommended.

    • “It is a very good game; there are no glitches or frame drops.”
    • “Not very buggy as I thought it would be considering the look of the game.”
    • “I cannot in good conscience recommend this 'game.' This is an unfinished, buggy project that has atrocious visuals, mechanics, AI, collisions, etc. It may have been released in 2020, but it's as clunky as something that was developed in 1998.”
    • “It's riddled with glitches, like lost progress, collision issues, annoying NPCs, convoluted game mechanics, and pathetic implementation of half-baked concepts.”
    • “This game is so buggy, it genuinely pisses me off. First off, the AI can't drive for shit, and the work that you can get for a side job is so buggy that I swear I'll get a job, and 'I'll be too late' so I can't work even though the car mechanics are trash.”
  • humor
    60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding it amusing due to its wacky graphics, quirky bugs, and absurd design choices, such as the illogical item packaging. However, some reviewers noted that the humor can become repetitive or frustrating, especially when overshadowed by gameplay issues and a lack of content. Overall, while the game has its funny moments, its execution leaves much to be desired, leading to a varied reception of its comedic elements.

    • “The wacky graphics, physics, and sometimes text make the gameplay somewhat more hilarious.”
    • “Funny and addictive game!”
    • “Lastly, the news post for the release of this game was hilarious, 'developed for a long time.'”
    • “Bought it for the memes and then realized those memes were not funny”
  • story
    54 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews overwhelmingly indicate that the games lack a significant story or plot, with many players noting the absence of missions beyond a few brief tasks in "Internet Cafe Simulator 2." Most users rate the storytelling aspect as nonexistent or extremely poor, criticizing the lack of engaging narrative and character development. Overall, the consensus is that these games do not provide a meaningful story experience.

    • “Very good game, 100% no bugs and an amazing story. Also, you can become Elon Musk and that's very epic.”
    • “📚 story”
    • “☑ story?”
    • “Genuinely this game is not fun, the graphics are poor and so are the character interactions, dialogue, and storyline... genuinely not worth more than £5.”
    • “The tutorial is non-existent, with no backstory.”
    • “Story (what can I say about the story in a game that's just a simulator)/10”
  • grinding
    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game is frequently described as tedious and frustrating, with many players expressing that it feels like a chore due to a lack of meaningful variety in tasks. While some find enjoyment in the grind, others report significant bugs and issues that detract from the experience, leading to feelings of boredom and annoyance. Overall, the game may appeal to those who enjoy grinding mechanics, but it often feels overly repetitive and unengaging.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “There is a lack of meaningful variety in the tasks and activities available, leading to a lack of engagement and ultimately making the game feel tedious and unexciting.”
    • “The entire game is either tedious, annoying, or boring.”
    • “I can look past the fact that the game was obviously made by a small team, maybe one guy, not a native English speaker, and the game looks ugly as sin, but the gameplay at least early on is just terrible, tedious, unfun, and such a chore.”
  • optimization
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization is widely criticized, with many users reporting poor performance and low frame rates even on decent hardware. Reviewers note that the graphics and overall performance are subpar, likening the game's quality to a college project, and express frustration over the lack of updates to address these issues. While some find the gameplay enjoyable, the optimization problems significantly detract from the overall experience.

    • “The performance and optimization is just as nice as the graphics.”
    • “The game is pretty simple and fun, though it should be optimized better; I am playing on a decent PC and still get around 50 fps.”
    • “PC performance 60 fps (my rig: Ryzen 5800H | RTX 3060 mobile (6GB) | 16GB RAM).”
    • “The optimization is poor, and the beginning is quite boring (there's no desire to continue playing it).”
    • “A poorly optimized game, where the last patch update was a year ago, so clearly the developers don't care about the quality.”
    • “If the game was optimized better, I would love to give a positive review, but it is very unstable.”
  • monetization
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with many users expressing frustration over the lack of updates and perceived abandonment by the developers. Reviewers feel that the game prioritizes profit over quality, likening it to a mobile game that requires payments to enhance the experience, ultimately leading to disappointment among players who feel misled.

    • “I feel bad for everyone who bought this shitty cash grab game made by greedy developers whom I'm never gonna trust again.”
    • “Very apparent low-quality cash grab from devs that could care less.”
    • “This is an obvious cash grab, abandoned and is far from a finished game.”
  • music
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with players noting a lack of background music during key gameplay moments, particularly during coding tasks, which they find tedious and unengaging. Additionally, when music is present, it is described as annoying and lacking customization options, contributing to an overall disappointing audio experience. Many users express frustration, feeling that the absence of compelling music detracts significantly from their enjoyment of the game.

    • “🎶 music”
    • “Audio and music”
    • “This and Thief Simulator lack background music except for a few areas; that might be the most annoying thing about both games.”
    • “The music is annoying as hell, you barely have any customization, the streaming makes no sense, and it's boring. Don't buy this game; it might be fun if you got it for free, but knowing I threw away 13 dollars for this game is really frustrating.”
    • “I'm 3 hours in and I haven't been able to stream one time because the microphone I bought despawned. The only way to earn a profit early on is to do coding jobs, which are time-consuming and boring (there's not even any music during these).”
  • replayability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players generally find the game to be highly replayable, with many stating it can be enjoyed multiple times. However, some note that it may become repetitive after a few playthroughs.

    • “The game is infinitely replayable, offering new experiences with each playthrough.”
    • “I find myself coming back to this game time and time again; it's almost infinitely replayable.”
    • “The replayability factor is incredible, making every session feel fresh and exciting.”
    • “It is definitely replayable at least once before it gets repetitive.”
  • character development
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game has been criticized for its lack of depth in character development and interaction, with reviewers calling for a more authentic representation of the streaming industry that includes realistic challenges. They suggest that with significant improvements in gameplay mechanics and character development, the game could become a more engaging simulation.

    • “Furthermore, the game lacks depth in terms of character development and interaction.”
    • “They should strive to create a more authentic representation of the streaming industry, incorporating realistic challenges and allowing for meaningful character development and interaction.”
    • “However, with significant tweaking and improvements in gameplay mechanics, authenticity, character development, and technical aspects, the game could evolve into a more compelling and enjoyable simulation of the streaming world.”
  • atmosphere
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the graphics while others criticize it for a low-effort design, including poorly executed characters, bugged elements, and subpar sound quality. Overall, the repetitive gameplay contributes to a lackluster atmosphere that detracts from the overall experience.

    • “I personally liked the game; its atmosphere and graphics are captivating.”
    • “The atmosphere in the game is immersive and enhances the overall experience.”
    • “The game's atmosphere draws you in, making every moment feel alive.”
    • “From taking 10 seconds to store things in your 'backpack' or transfer them to your hand, to the horribly designed in-game 'websites' and a low-effort atmosphere (bugged sky box, poorly designed characters, free 3D models, and awful sound design), Streamer Life Simulator is the game you want to play if you want to repeat the same thing over and over again: stream, eat, sleep, repeat.”

Buy Streamer Life Simulator

11h Median play time
13h Average play time
10h Main story
31h Completionist
8-19h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 20 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Streamer Life Simulator

Internet Cafe Simulator 2 Image
Youtubers Life Image
Thief Simulator Image
Gas Station Simulator Image
Car For Sale Simulator 2023 Image