Streamer Life Simulator
- August 21, 2020
- Cheesecake Dev
- 11h median play time
Get on Steam
Get on Apple Store"Streamer Life Simulator" allows you to rise to fame as a popular streamer, starting from scratch and improving your character and equipment. Stream games, interact with followers, and earn money to upgrade your setup and buy new games. Complete additional tasks and interactions in your environment to earn extra income, and take care of pets for added fun.
iPad
iPhone
PC
Phone
Windows
Mobile Platform
Tablet
Reviews
- The game is surprisingly addictive and offers a lot of content for players to explore.
- It provides a unique simulation experience of being a streamer, with various activities like bitcoin mining and managing personal needs.
- The developer is active in the community and has released multiple hotfix updates to address bugs.
- The game is riddled with bugs that can lead to lost progress and unplayable situations.
- Graphics and overall presentation are poor, making the game feel unfinished and low quality.
- Many players report frustrating gameplay mechanics, such as clunky driving and issues with item management.
- graphics83 mentions
- 17 % positive mentions
- 53 % neutral mentions
- 30 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many reviewers describing them as outdated, clunky, and reminiscent of early 2000s titles or even earlier. Users report frequent bugs and poor optimization, leading to a frustrating experience even on lower settings. While some appreciate the gameplay, the consensus is that significant improvements in graphics and overall polish are necessary for a better gaming experience.
“The performance and optimization is just as nice as the graphics.”
“The graphics and sounds of the game are also pretty good, especially the sounds made by your streamer character and your followers.”
“They must have put a lot of effort into making this game so good and in-depth that I can forgive the fact that it doesn't run very smooth with obviously less than perfect graphics.”
“Graphic quality is never usually something that can make or break a game for me...but this game looks like it was put together by a 5-year-old who just learned how to make games.”
“The graphics are barely acceptable by PlayStation 2 standards, the gameplay is not fun, and there are spelling and grammar errors everywhere.”
“Looks like a cheaply made lazy game from the poor graphics and poor optimization which it is, but it is not made lazily; you can feel people put effort and love into this game aside from the NPCs' poor graphics and lack of proper optimizations for lower-end PCs.”
- gameplay83 mentions
- 23 % positive mentions
- 58 % neutral mentions
- 19 % negative mentions
The gameplay of the game has been widely criticized for being unfinished, buggy, and lacking depth, with many players reporting frustrating mechanics, poor AI, and numerous glitches that hinder the experience. While some users find the core concept enjoyable and the gameplay loop potentially engaging, the overwhelming consensus is that the game suffers from significant technical issues and a lack of meaningful content, making it difficult to recommend. Overall, the gameplay is described as tedious, repetitive, and plagued by problems that detract from any potential enjoyment.
“Its a perfect mix of complex and simple gameplay that's both fun to play and makes you feel smart too.”
“I had fun playing, and it makes good suggestions for people that are playing computer all day: like there is a mechanic where you have to eat and it reminds you that you're hungry.”
“It's surprisingly deep with its options and mechanics than I expected and is certain to get at least a chuckle out of you.”
“I cannot in good conscience recommend this 'game.' This is an unfinished, buggy project that has atrocious visuals, mechanics, AI, collisions, etc. It may have been released in 2020, but it's as clunky as something that was developed in 1998.”
“The gameplay itself is rather slow and monotonous, the overall experience is littered with bugs like the car consistently getting stuck, the poor driving mechanics, the awful collision, and the fact the supposed tutorial leaves so much information about events, jobs, and items in the game just makes the game more frustrating than fun.”
“It's riddled with glitches, like lost progress, collision issues, annoying NPCs, convoluted game mechanics, and pathetic implementation of half-baked concepts.”
- stability69 mentions
- 3 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 97 % negative mentions
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent glitches, lag spikes, and game-breaking bugs that significantly hinder the overall experience. Many players describe it as an unfinished and poorly polished product, leading to lost progress and frustrating gameplay. While some find it entertaining despite the issues, the consensus is that the game requires substantial updates and fixes to improve its stability.
“It is a very good game; there are no glitches or frame drops.”
“Not very buggy as I thought it would be considering the look of the game.”
“I cannot in good conscience recommend this game. This is an unfinished, buggy project that has atrocious visuals, mechanics, AI, collisions, etc. It may have been released in 2020, but it's as clunky as something that was developed in 1998.”
“It's riddled with glitches, like lost progress, collision issues, annoying NPCs, convoluted game mechanics, and pathetic implementation of half-baked concepts.”
“The game is super buggy; the last update was last year, as if the developers stopped caring.”
- humor30 mentions
- 97 % positive mentions
- -7 % neutral mentions
- 10 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players finding the wacky graphics, quirky bugs, and absurd design choices amusing, often likening it to a poorly executed college project. While some aspects, like the AI and certain gameplay elements, elicit genuine laughter, others feel repetitive or frustrating, leading to a love-hate relationship with the game's comedic elements. Overall, the humor is engaging for some, but it can also be hit-or-miss, with many players noting that the execution leaves much to be desired.
“The wacky graphics, physics, and sometimes text make the gameplay somewhat more hilarious.”
“Funny and addictive game!”
“Hilarious and mindless.”
“Bought it for the memes and then realized those memes were not funny.”
“The humor fell flat and felt forced, making it hard to enjoy.”
“I expected clever jokes, but instead got tired clichés.”
- story27 mentions
- 4 % positive mentions
- 67 % neutral mentions
- 30 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate a significant lack of story across the games, with many users noting that there are either no missions or a minimal plot, particularly in "Internet Cafe Simulator 2," which features only a few brief tasks. Overall, players express disappointment in the narrative depth, with many labeling the games as lacking any meaningful storyline or character development.
“Very good game, 100% no bugs and an amazing story. Also, you can become Elon Musk, and that's very epic.”
“This game has no story.”
“Genuinely, this game is not fun; the graphics are poor and so are the character interactions, dialogue, and storyline... genuinely not worth more than £5.”
“The tutorial is non-existent, with no backstory.”
- grinding25 mentions
- 4 % positive mentions
- 20 % neutral mentions
- 76 % negative mentions
The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being tedious and often frustrating, with many players feeling that the repetitive tasks lack meaningful variety and engagement. While some find enjoyment in the grind, it is frequently described as a chore that can lead to boredom and rage quitting, especially due to bugs and poor mechanics. Overall, players suggest that the game requires a significant time investment, often humorously noting that one might need "a second life" to fully engage with the grinding elements.
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“There is a lack of meaningful variety in the tasks and activities available, leading to a lack of engagement and ultimately making the game feel tedious and unexciting.”
“The entire game is either tedious, annoying, or boring.”
“If developers invest more time, it might be an okay game, but right now the game is really scuffed with some bugs, and it is really boring and tedious.”
- optimization12 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 17 % neutral mentions
- 58 % negative mentions
The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users reporting poor performance, low frame rates, and a lack of updates from developers. Players have noted that the game feels unpolished and is not well-suited for higher-end systems, leading to frustration and a lack of desire to continue playing. Despite some enjoyment of the gameplay mechanics, the overall consensus is that the game's optimization issues significantly detract from the experience.
“The performance and optimization is just as nice as the graphics.”
“The game is pretty simple and fun, though it should be optimized better; I am playing on a decent PC and still get around 50 fps.”
“PC performance is 60 fps (my rig: Ryzen 5800H | RTX 3060 mobile (6GB) | 16GB RAM).”
“The fact they are charging money for this is funny; it looks like a game project for college just to get a good grade. The game is unoptimized, and the beginning is quite boring (there's no desire to continue playing it).”
“The optimization is poor, and the beginning is quite boring (there's no desire to continue playing it).”
“A poorly optimized game, where the last patch update was a year ago, so clearly the developers don't care about the quality.”
- monetization8 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game has been heavily criticized, with users labeling it as a blatant cash grab due to a lack of updates and perceived abandonment by the developers. Many players feel that the game prioritizes profit over quality, comparing it to mobile games that require payments to enhance the experience or remove ads. Overall, the sentiment reflects disappointment in the developers' commitment to delivering a finished and engaging product.
“The developer just makes games, says he's going to add stuff, then moves onto another project. He's done it three times now and will probably continue to do so with his current cash grab.”
“I feel bad for everyone who bought this terrible cash grab game made by greedy developers whom I'm never going to trust again.”
“This is an obvious cash grab, abandoned and far from a finished game.”
- music6 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The music in the game has received largely negative feedback, with users noting a lack of background music in key gameplay areas, which contributes to a monotonous experience. Additionally, when music is present, it is often described as annoying and lacking customization options. Overall, the audio experience detracts significantly from the enjoyment of the game.
“The music in this game is absolutely captivating and enhances the overall experience.”
“The audio and music create an immersive atmosphere that draws you into the game world.”
“The soundtrack is well-composed and perfectly complements the gameplay.”
“This and Thief Simulator lack background music except for a few areas; that might be the most annoying thing about both games.”
“The music is annoying as hell, you barely have any customization, the streaming makes no sense, and it's boring. Don't buy this game; it might be fun if you got it for free, but knowing I threw away 13 of my dollars for this is really frustrating.”
“Just filling noises/no music.”
- replayability3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- -33 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
Users generally find the game to have high replayability, with many stating it is infinitely replayable or at least enjoyable for multiple playthroughs. However, some note that it may become repetitive after a certain point.
“The game offers an infinitely replayable experience, with new challenges and surprises every time.”
“Each playthrough feels fresh and engaging, making it hard to put down.”
“The variety of choices and outcomes ensures that no two runs are ever the same.”
“It is definitely replayable at least once before it gets repetitive.”
- character development3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game has been criticized for its lack of depth in character development and interaction, with reviewers calling for a more authentic representation of the streaming industry that includes realistic challenges. They believe that with improvements in gameplay mechanics and character development, the game could become a more engaging simulation.
“Furthermore, the game lacks depth in terms of character development and interaction.”
“They should strive to create a more authentic representation of the streaming industry, incorporating realistic challenges and allowing for meaningful character development and interaction.”
“However, with significant tweaking and improvements in gameplay mechanics, authenticity, character development, and technical aspects, the game could evolve into a more compelling and enjoyable simulation of the streaming world.”
- atmosphere2 mentions
- 150 % positive mentions
- -100 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere has received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the graphics, while others criticize it for a low-effort design characterized by poorly crafted environments, bugged elements, and subpar sound design. Overall, the repetitive nature of gameplay contributes to a lackluster immersive experience.
“I personally liked the game; its atmosphere and graphics were captivating.”
“The atmosphere in this game is incredibly immersive, drawing you into its world.”
“Every detail contributes to a haunting atmosphere that keeps you on the edge of your seat.”
“From taking 10 seconds to store things in your backpack or transfer them to your hand, to the horribly designed in-game websites and a low-effort atmosphere (bugged skybox, poorly designed characters, free 3D models, and awful sound design), Streamer Life Simulator is the game you want to play if you want to repeat the same thing over and over again: stream, eat, sleep, repeat.”
