Skip to main content

Starfield

If you have the time to spare, Starfield is a worthy investment into another gaming universe that delivers a truly immersive experience
Starfield Game Cover
62%Game Brain Score
story, gameplay
optimization, stability
56% User Score Based on 111,107 reviews
Critic Score 89%Based on 6 reviews

Platforms

PCWindowsXbox Series X|SCloudXboxXbox Game Passx_box_cloud_gaming
Starfield Game Cover

About

"Starfield is an upcoming role-playing game set in a new universe created by the developers of Skyrim and Fallout 4. In the year 2330, players will embark on a journey to explore and uncover humanity's greatest mystery with unparalleled freedom. The premium edition includes early access, an expansion, and exclusive in-game skins and items."

Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
Starfield screenshot
+2

56%
Audience ScoreBased on 111,113 reviews
story11.9k positive mentions
optimization2.7k negative mentions

  • The shipbuilding mechanics and gunplay are fun and engaging, adding depth to the gameplay.
  • The graphics are stunning, showcasing impressive environments and a captivating 'nasa-punk' aesthetic.
  • Some side quests and faction storylines are praised for their depth and creativity, providing enjoyable experiences.
  • The gameplay is repetitive and lacks depth, often feeling like a series of fetch quests.
  • The game suffers from severe performance issues, including stuttering and crashes, even on high-end systems.
  • The monetization model, including microtransactions and paid mods, is seen as a cash grab that undermines the game's value.
  • story
    57,525 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story in "Starfield" has received mixed reviews, with many players finding the main quest to be lackluster and repetitive, often described as a series of fetch quests that fail to engage. While some side quests and faction storylines are praised for their depth and creativity, the overall narrative is seen as generic and uninspired, lacking the compelling character development and intricate storytelling found in previous Bethesda titles. Additionally, the introduction of paid quests has drawn criticism, further detracting from the game's perceived value and narrative cohesion.

    • “The story is good, and enjoyable.”
    • “The main story is solid.”
    • “The main story, while occasionally trying to spice it up, has no real hook.”
    • “The main quest is a giant fetch quest, like how do you even mess this up?”
    • “The story is bland and filled with fetch and kill this person quests.”
    • “The main story is easily the worst part of Starfield.”
  • gameplay
    15,669 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of Starfield has received mixed reviews, with many players noting its repetitive nature and lack of depth compared to previous Bethesda titles. While the shipbuilding mechanics and gunplay are praised for their fun and engaging aspects, the overall experience is marred by excessive loading screens, uninspired quests, and a disjointed narrative that fails to capitalize on the game's expansive universe. Critics argue that the game feels like a rehash of older mechanics without significant innovation, leading to a gameplay loop that quickly becomes tedious.

    • “The gameplay is smooth and intuitive.”
    • “The shipbuilding mechanic is cool, though if there’s a way to get the interior of your ship to layout in a way that doesn’t look like a nightmare, I would love to see that.”
    • “The core gameplay loop is fine, but there are other games that cost a lot less than Starfield.”
    • “Starfield is a thin veneer of aesthetics and reheated gameplay, mistaking the promise of infinite procedural generation exploration for anything remotely compelling for an actual human being to experience.”
    • “The gameplay quickly becomes bland, boring, and repetitive: fetch this, speak to that, rinse and repeat.”
    • “The gameplay feels clunky, the planets are mostly empty, and the much-hyped space travel is nothing more than loading screens disguised as exploration.”
  • graphics
    9,742 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in Starfield have received mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals and the "nasa-punk" aesthetic, particularly in space and on certain planets. However, there are significant criticisms regarding character modeling, performance issues, and the game's reliance on an outdated engine, leading to a perception that the graphics do not meet the high expectations set for a 2023 release. Overall, while the game showcases impressive environments, it struggles with optimization and consistency, leaving some players feeling underwhelmed.

    • “The graphics are stunning, and the soundtrack further enhances the atmosphere of exploring unknown planets.”
    • “The visuals are themed and even stunning in some areas.”
    • “The graphics are incredible, but the performance is poor.”
    • “Starfield is a thin veneer of aesthetics and reheated gameplay, mistaking the promise of infinite procgen exploration for anything remotely compelling for an actual human being to experience.”
    • “The graphics look to be at least a decade old and Bethesda seems to be completely oblivious to the fact that Cyberpunk 2077 even exists, let alone was released several years before this absolute graphical dumpster fire.”
    • “The graphics are not very good for 2023 and take a lot to run them, I enjoy playing it but the performance is horrendous on my hardware.”
  • optimization
    7,898 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of "Starfield" has been widely criticized, with many players reporting severe performance issues, including stuttering, frame rate drops, and crashes, even on high-end systems. Despite some improvements from patches, the game is still considered poorly optimized, particularly for NVIDIA graphics cards, leading to frustration among players who feel the game does not meet the expected standards for a AAA title. Overall, while some users have managed to achieve decent performance with mods and specific settings, the consensus is that significant optimization work is still needed to enhance the gaming experience.

    • “The updates since launch have been great for performance and quality of life.”
    • “With some performance-enhancing mods and a positive attitude, this game is one of the best I've played.”
    • “For a Bethesda game, it is probably the most stable and optimized engine they have ever released.”
    • “The game is unplayable due to severe performance issues, constant crashes, and major bugs.”
    • “Somehow it's still terribly unoptimized and bug-ridden since its launch over a year ago.”
    • “The performance is still horrible after more than a year.”
  • stability
    5,223 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of "Starfield" has garnered mixed feedback from players, with many noting that while it is touted as the least buggy release from Bethesda, it still suffers from a variety of glitches and performance issues. Common complaints include frequent freezes, audio desynchronization, and game-breaking bugs that can hinder progress, particularly in quests. Despite these issues, some players have reported relatively smooth experiences, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on hardware and individual play styles. Overall, while the game shows potential, its current state is often described as a buggy mess, leading many to recommend waiting for further patches before diving in.

    • “Starfield is surprisingly not buggy.”
    • “The game is surprisingly bug free, well worth the delays to coming out.”
    • “Overall great game and relatively bug free for a AAA Bethesda release.”
    • “Despite meeting the recommended system requirements and trying everything from troubleshooting to reinstalling the game, it still won’t run as expected.”
    • “Somehow it's still terribly unoptimized and bug-ridden since its launch over a year ago.”
    • “The game is a buggy, clunky mess and not worth the price.”
  • grinding
    3,050 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of "Starfield" has received overwhelmingly negative feedback from players, who describe it as tedious, repetitive, and often frustrating. Many reviews highlight the excessive reliance on fetch quests, the slow progression of skills and perks, and the cumbersome inventory management system, all of which contribute to a gameplay experience that feels more like a chore than an engaging adventure. While some players appreciate the depth of content and the potential for exploration, the overall sentiment is that the game is bogged down by its grindy mechanics, leading to a lack of enjoyment and immersion.

    • “Lore is pretty nice, pretty fun, not too grindy unless you want it to be.”
    • “Most of the missions are pretty cool, I like the baseline story and the side quests are not tedious.”
    • “There's no grinding unless you seek the grind.”
    • “The quests and levels to unlock special abilities lack any variation whatsoever and thus became a very tedious and unfun experience after the first couple of times.”
    • “While I appreciated the attempt to shake things up, something is definitely wrong when what should have been a simple and enjoyable exploration experience quickly devolved into an incredibly tedious and frustrating grind.”
    • “The main quest is tedious and, as far as I played, represents a series of fetch quests.”
  • music
    1,993 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in "Starfield" has received mixed reviews, with many praising its orchestral score and atmospheric qualities, which enhance the game's exploration and combat experiences. However, some players find the soundtrack to be repetitive and uninspired, often comparing it unfavorably to previous Bethesda titles like "Skyrim" and "Fallout." While the music is generally considered a highlight, it suffers from issues such as audio cutting out and a lack of memorable tracks, leading to a perception of it being less impactful than expected.

    • “The soundtrack, composed by Inon Zur, is a masterful blend of orchestral and electronic elements that perfectly captures the game’s epic scope.”
    • “The stunning graphics showcase vibrant celestial bodies and intricately designed spacecraft, while the atmospheric soundtrack and ambient sounds further elevate the experience.”
    • “The music is incredible, the ship building is great, and the voice acting and quests are good.”
    • “And the generic music is unmemorable and falls awfully short of Jeremy Soule’s masterpieces for previous Elder Scrolls games.”
    • “A game about the cosmos should feel grand and majestic, but Starfield’s music puts me to sleep—not in the soothing way of ambient space music at 432hz, but in a monotonous, uninspired way.”
    • “The music in Starfield is bland, uninspired, and completely forgettable.”
  • atmosphere
    1,543 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere in "Starfield" is a mixed bag, with many players praising its stunning visuals, immersive sound design, and the sense of wonder it evokes while exploring diverse planets. However, the lack of atmospheric flight and the reliance on loading screens for transitions between space and planetary surfaces detracts from the overall experience, leading to feelings of frustration and disappointment. While the game captures some of the charm of previous Bethesda titles, it falls short in delivering a truly seamless and engaging exploration experience.

    • “The graphics are stunning, and the soundtrack further enhances the atmosphere of exploring unknown planets.”
    • “The atmosphere is great for anyone who enjoys sci-fi; at points, it reminded me of 'The Expanse'.”
    • “The sheer scale and scope of the game are impressive, and it successfully creates an immersive atmosphere that captivates you.”
    • “The game looks good and atmosphere is cool, but it's so buggy it makes the gameplay annoying.”
    • “You can't fly your ship in the atmosphere of a planet.”
    • “The overall atmosphere of the game is bland and lifeless.”
  • humor
    1,520 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in "Starfield" has received mixed reviews, with many players noting a lack of the signature wit and charm typically found in Bethesda's previous titles like "Fallout" and "Skyrim." While some players appreciate the occasional funny dialogue and amusing bugs, others criticize the writing as bland and the humor as forced or absent, leading to a sense of disappointment. Overall, the game features moments of unintentional comedy through glitches and NPC interactions, but many feel it falls short of delivering a consistently engaging or humorous experience.

    • “The dialogue can be very funny.”
    • “The characters are both hilarious and annoying.”
    • “The writing is just hilariously bad, even by Bethesda's standards that I consider to have a charm to them.”
    • “Starfield is the definition of unfunny.”
    • “Bethesda built it for 12 year olds; there is no substance to it and everything is beyond corny, like not funny corny, like childish corny.”
    • “Let me be blunt: shattered space is a joke and an unfunny one at that.”
  • emotional
    943 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of "Starfield" has received mixed reviews, with many players expressing disappointment over the lack of depth and emotional engagement compared to previous Bethesda titles. While some side quests and character arcs offer touching moments, the overall narrative is often described as flat and uninspiring, leading to a sense of detachment from the story and its characters. Players frequently mention that the game fails to evoke strong emotional responses, with many feeling that the writing and character development do not live up to the emotional highs found in other RPGs like "Mass Effect" or "The Elder Scrolls."

    • “Kryx's legacy quest line is really touching, especially if you side with UC SysDef.”
    • “The main storyline is compelling, but side quests often steal the show with their creativity and emotional impact.”
    • “The orchestral score is both epic and nuanced, enhancing the emotional weight of key story moments as well as the awe of space exploration.”
    • “This has the single most boring story ever written for a sci-fi setting.”
    • “It's just a boring story set in a boring world and no amount of mods from the community will be able to fix that.”
    • “Couple that with a boring story, relatively poor writing & what is essentially a 'loading screen' simulator, and you get one painful slog of an experience.”
  • replayability
    844 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The replayability of "Starfield" has garnered mixed reviews, with many players expressing disappointment compared to previous Bethesda titles like "Skyrim" and "Fallout." While some appreciate the new game plus (ng+) feature and the potential for diverse character builds, others criticize the game for its repetitive quests, lack of meaningful choices, and a world that feels empty, leading to a perception of limited replay value. Overall, while there are elements that encourage replayability, such as mod support and branching storylines, many players feel it falls short of the high expectations set by its predecessors.

    • “Scratched all my Skyrim, Fallout, and space combat needs, while giving me plenty of replayability - I'm currently on my 5th replay, and still have storylines I haven't touched yet!”
    • “The story is solid and the game has plenty of replay value with a unique take on New Game Plus (NG+) built right in.”
    • “With a wealth of side quests, branching storylines, and various play styles, Starfield promises endless replayability.”
    • “Replay value of the game equals zero.”
    • “Only played through the entire game one time since it lacks replay value.”
    • “There's just no replayability; the more you play hoping to come across something new, it just becomes more and more clear how empty the game is.”
  • monetization
    560 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization model of the game has drawn widespread criticism, with many players labeling it a blatant cash grab due to the introduction of microtransactions and paid mods shortly after release. Reviewers express disappointment over the perceived exploitation of the modding community and the high costs associated with minimal content, arguing that the game feels incomplete and is primarily designed to generate revenue rather than provide a fulfilling gaming experience. Overall, the sentiment is that the monetization practices undermine the game's potential and betray the trust of long-time fans.

    • “The monetization of mods feels like a missed opportunity to further invest in core game development and deliver more substantial enhancements.”
    • “I would change this rating to a recommend, but the new creators club mod monetization is predatory and I can't recommend that.”
    • “It's a complete game on release with barely any bugs and no microtransactions in 2023.”
    • “Bethesda has taken all the trust of its fans and used it as a cash grab the past few games they have made and have done it again.”
    • “This game is a soulless cash grab, and Bethesda should be appalled that they allowed this abject garbage to ever make it out of alpha testing let alone be published in this state.”
    • “The game is simply a cash grab by Bethesda, who tried to capitalize on the hype of Starfield without putting any effort or passion into it.”
  • character development
    344 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Character development in "Starfield" has received mixed reviews, with many players noting a lack of depth and emotional engagement in both NPCs and the protagonist. While some appreciate the variety in character customization and skill trees, others criticize the superficiality of interactions and the absence of meaningful choices that impact relationships and storylines. Overall, the game is seen as falling short compared to previous Bethesda titles, with many players longing for the richer character arcs and narrative complexity found in games like "Fallout" and "The Elder Scrolls."

    • “Through masterful storytelling and nuanced character development, Bethesda weaves a tale of ambition, discovery, and the enduring spirit of exploration.”
    • “Starfield has a great storyline and character development.”
    • “The character development is enticingly interesting.”
    • “The character development and dialogue writing is often trope-laden and superficial.”
    • “There is no real character development; you can literally be everyone's best friend, with no real choices.”
    • “A lackluster narrative coupled with uninspiring character development leaves players wanting more, and not in a good way.”

Buy Starfield

60h Median play time
114h Average play time
20-140h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2,061 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Starfield

The Outer Worlds Image
Fallout 4 Image
Dragon's Dogma 2 Image
Assassin's Creed Valhalla Image
Fallout 76 Image
We Happy Few Deluxe Edition Image
No Man's Sky Image
Avowed Image
BIOMUTANT Image
SpaceBourne 2 Image