Skip to main content

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer

Star Wars: Episode One Racer is an excellent arcade-style racing game filled with fast-paced action and tight, responsive controls. It is the type of game that deserves these kind of re-releases, it is a loved relic from a bygone age.
STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer Game Cover
78%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, story
85% User Score Based on 1,524 reviews
Critic Score 75%Based on 10 reviews

Platforms

Nintendo SwitchPCNintendo 64Playstation 5Mac OSPlaystation 4Xbox OneXboxDreamcastWindowsPlayStation
STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer Game Cover

About

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer is a single player and multiplayer arcade racing game with a science fiction theme. It was developed by LucasArts and was released on November 16, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from critics and positive reviews from players.

The fan favorite racer is back featuring motion controls! Take control of a podracer speeding through flaming methane lakes, Tusken Raider assaults, anti-gravity tunnels, and much more in a pulse-pounding, do-or-die fight to the finish line. KEY FEATURES: - Choose from 25 playable racers including: Anakin Skywalker, Sebulba, and Ratts Tyerell - Race tracks spanning 8 unique worlds including: T…

Skip User Reviews

85%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,524 reviews
graphics38 positive mentions
stability43 negative mentions

  • Nostalgic and fun arcade racing game that captures the thrill of high-speed podracing with a strong Star Wars atmosphere and soundtrack.
  • Smooth and responsive controls with a variety of racers, upgradeable pods, and well-designed tracks offering multiple paths and challenging layouts.
  • Runs well on modern PCs with controller support (especially Xbox controllers), high frame rates, and improved resolution compared to the original release.
  • The PC port is plagued with technical issues including frequent crashes, compatibility problems on modern operating systems, and buggy menus or visuals.
  • Lacks modern features such as split-screen multiplayer and has no online multiplayer, limiting replayability and multiplayer experience.
  • Dated graphics and small cutscene videos, awkward default controls, and unbalanced AI difficulty that reduces challenge and engagement for experienced players.
  • graphics
    177 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are widely acknowledged as dated and reflective of its late 1990s origin, featuring low-resolution textures, blocky models, and occasional graphical glitches. While not visually impressive by modern standards, many players appreciate the nostalgic charm and distinctive art style, with some enhancements possible through mods. Despite its outdated visuals, the fast-paced gameplay and classic Star Wars atmosphere keep the experience engaging and enjoyable.

    • “The game's graphics are definitely dated, but the gameplay is still golden.”
    • “I love everything about it such as its high speed gameplay, classic graphics, and fantastic soundtrack.”
    • “Blocky late-90's graphics will warm your nostalgia bones.”
    • “Disappointingly this version looks pretty janky; very fuzzy graphics (especially the interface) no matter the resolution, while the decent looking cinematics do not fill the screen... shame it was not remastered.”
    • “If your looking for better graphic racing game, this game is definitely not for you, look elsewhere.”
    • “The graphics are horrible, the voice acting is mediocre, the controls are okay, and the upgrade system is as simple as 'win a bunch of times and upgrade your stuff.'”
  • gameplay
    123 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay across the reviewed titles emphasizes fast-paced, skill-based mechanics that reward mastery of risk, boost management, and track nuances, creating a satisfying and enduring racing experience despite dated graphics and occasional technical issues. While some complexity in mechanics (e.g., damage, repairs, and boosting) can feel opaque or awkward, the core gameplay remains compelling, especially for fans of social deduction or nostalgic racing, with high replay value driven by nuanced physics and variety in challenges. Players seeking deep solo content or modern visual fidelity may find limitations, but the games excel in delivering smooth, engaging gameplay that emphasizes player skill and strategic decisions.

    • “Rather than relying on action-heavy mechanics or visual spectacle, the game frames itself as a cerebral contest of trust and manipulation, wrapped in a stylized hacking theme.”
    • “A single clever bluff or well-timed reveal can dramatically alter the course of a match, making social awareness just as important as mechanical knowledge.”
    • “Untrusted stands out because it transforms conversation, doubt, and trust into its primary gameplay mechanics, offering matches that linger in memory long after they end.”
    • “The challenge should have been trying to flow the vehicle around corners, but it falls flat because the speeds involved in podracer (coupled with the corners being shaped like triangles) made the gameplay too chaotic.”
    • “Gameplay mechanics that should have added depth are somewhat confusing. Like the repair droids and junkyard features, which to this day I still don't understand how they were meant to fit into the gameplay.”
    • “Be warned that the mechanics for boosting, repairing, pit droids, and the junkyard are all very opaque, so you will have to look those up on the internet.”
  • music
    74 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game, primarily John Williams' iconic Star Wars orchestral soundtrack, is widely praised for enhancing the epic and immersive atmosphere, especially with its inclusion throughout entire races in the PC version. While the soundtrack elevates the racing experience and captures the film’s spirit, many note that the limited variety and repetitive looping of tracks can become tiresome over time. Overall, the music is considered a standout feature that significantly contributes to the game's nostalgic appeal.

    • “The PC version has a few differences: cutscenes, a soundtrack that plays during all three laps, and engine sounds different than on N64.”
    • “The music is great, straight from the movies and the additions for the game tie in very well, the swelling music really does get your blood pumping.”
    • “This game wouldn't be much if it wasn't for the great John Williams music.”
    • “It is a fun nostalgia trip with very solid racing mechanics and track design, but I gotta say the same small handful of short music loops can drive you mad after a while.”
    • “The game also suffers from poor musical loops, especially compared to the Nintendo 64 version even if the music is constantly being played on the PC version.”
    • “Honestly the design of the courses and the music and the engine noise is a bit exhausting and I was kind of glad it crashed.”
  • stability
    50 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is mixed, with many users reporting frequent glitches, crashes, and controller recognition issues that often require extensive troubleshooting; however, some players find it runs smoothly on certain systems without major problems. Despite bugs in menus, audio, and visuals, the core gameplay remains enjoyable and nostalgic for many, though the port feels unpolished and outdated by modern standards. Overall, stability can vary greatly depending on platform and user setup, making the experience inconsistent.

    • “It runs great on Windows 10 without any fiddling on my part; all I did was download it, press play, and it just worked.”
    • “This game runs great, it's smooth and nearly perfect.”
    • “Ran perfectly on Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7 and runs great on Windows 11 (haven't tested it on Windows 10 yet).”
    • “You have to wade your way through an ocean of glitches and imprecise controls in order to play this game.”
    • “The game is also really buggy when you tab out.”
    • “The game doesn't recognize my controller despite hours of troubleshooting.”
  • story
    26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game features minimal to no story, relying primarily on brief cutscenes and familiar Star Wars lines rather than a developed narrative. While some players found the lack of a substantial story disappointing, others focused more on the gameplay and atmosphere. There is potential for deeper storytelling, but the current version offers little beyond the racing experience.

    • “It's still enjoyable, though, and if it had come out later they could've easily added more podracers, better customization options, more characters, and perhaps even a story mode with your own character who goes through the pod building process, adding some flavor to the mix with different parts to the overall racer.”
    • “But tons of fun, plus it tells the story of the true hero of Star Wars: Dud Bolt, who died and was miraculously resurrected 9 times in a race in Oovo IV and still managed to win by a minute and a half.”
    • “The game has no story elements whatsoever and in general a minimal interface.”
    • “There is little to no story in this.”
    • “The low-res cutscenes are very basic, and were a missed opportunity to involve the characters or tell a story.”
  • optimization
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Optimization reviews for the game are mixed, with some users experiencing smooth performance and improved framerates compared to the original, while others report crashes, stuttering, and compatibility issues on modern systems. Though the game generally runs well on many setups, there are calls for comprehensive updates to fix bugs, alt-tab functionality, and to enhance overall stability and feature support. The port retains solid performance but lacks extensive optimization improvements or additional modern features.

    • “The game scales well and is optimized to run on mostly any system available these days.”
    • “It runs smoothly for me with no lagging or bugging out.”
    • “Performance is (expectedly) great.”
    • “It requires a comprehensive update to fix compatibility issues and ensure stable, high-resolution performance on modern systems.”
    • “Honestly, the optimization is bad; I had a couple of crashes when trying to tab out, but besides that, nothing.”
    • “Despite it being clear this is only a port and not a remaster, the developers didn't add minor features like achievements, bug-fixes, alt-tab optimization (and support for Steam overlay), and maybe a time trial mode.”
  • atmosphere
    13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its immersive Star Wars vibe, brought to life through John Williams' iconic score, varied and visually striking environments, and authentic sound design. Players highlight how the tension, unique stages, and thematic elements combine to create a memorable and engaging experience that captures the essence of the Star Wars universe. Overall, the atmosphere is considered a standout aspect, receiving high acclaim for enhancing both gameplay and nostalgia.

    • “The iconic score by John Williams pulses through each race, elevating the experience and reinforcing the Star Wars atmosphere.”
    • “An exciting and relaxing racing game set in the Star Wars universe, featuring beautiful planets, diverse racers, and an immersive atmosphere.”
    • “One of the more exciting things in the first film is displayed here in full LucasArts fashion, with all the appropriate Star Wars music, sound effects, quirky alien dialog, and just oozing with atmosphere.”
  • replayability
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Replayability is generally viewed as limited due to the lack of meaningful online multiplayer, a short game length, and absence of modes like time trials. While the core gameplay and improved controls offer some enjoyment, the overall challenge and incentive to replay are diminished, making it less appealing for long-term engagement.

    • “The game itself is rather short, but it does hold some replayability.”
    • “There isn't a ton of replayability, but it's probably fun with friends too.”
    • “Replay value: average.”
    • “Since the PC version lacks any meaningful online multiplayer, this imbalance is less of a competitive issue but also highlights one of the game’s biggest shortcomings: limited replay value.”
    • “It helped kill a day of time, but there isn't any replayability given how old this is.”
    • “Not enough replayability to be worth $10, in my opinion.”
  • humor
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is often described as fun and entertaining, with amusing characters, funny voiceovers, and a playful racing style that adds to the overall enjoyment. While some find certain voice lines repetitive, this repetition tends to enhance the comedic appeal rather than detract from it.

    • “The game features funny characters and voices, combined with a unique and fast racing style.”
    • “The orchestral music and funny voices are just as appealing as the graphics.”
    • “At times the voiceovers are hilariously repetitive, which I find somewhat entertaining.”
  • monetization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    While some users criticize the game as a low-quality cash grab exploiting nostalgia, others appreciate that it avoids loot boxes and microtransactions, offering a monetization approach free of common predatory practices.

    • “It comes without loot boxes and without microtransactions.”
    • “The AI is a little dated, but still runs very well for what is essentially a cash grab game.”
    • “Ultimately it's just a cash grab preying on nostalgia.”
    • “Great game, but an agonisingly low quality cash grab.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding is mostly limited to a few of the final races, which can feel cheap and tedious, requiring multiple attempts. Additionally, some levels have poor design with difficult turns that force slow, careful play.

    • “The only races that you'll probably need a few tries are the very last handful of courses, and one or two of them are annoyingly cheap and tedious.”
    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “Level design varies from great to really bad; some turns are impossible unless you slow down to a grinding halt.”
  • emotional
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users express a nostalgic and somewhat mixed emotional response, appreciating the game's affordability and chance to experience it on PC, while also feeling a sense of disbelief and longing for a tangible, physical version to enhance the experience.

Skip Critic Reviews

75%Critics’ scoreBased on 10 critic reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer

10h Median play time
13h Average play time
5h Main story
7h Completionist
4-20h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 11 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer is a arcade racing game with science fiction theme.

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer is available on Nintendo Switch, PC, PlayStation 5, Mac OS and others.

The main story can be completed in around 5 hours, while the entire game is estimated to take about 7 hours to finish. On average players spend around 13 hours playing STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer.

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer was released on November 16, 2018.

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer was developed by LucasArts.

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer has received mostly positive reviews from players and mostly positive reviews from critics. Most players liked STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

STAR WARS™ Episode I Racer is a single player game with multiplayer and local co-op support.

Similar games include Re-Volt, Star Wars Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II, Star Wars: Rogue Squadron, Need for Speed Hot Pursuit Remastered, Grand Theft Auto III and others.