Skip to main content
Star Sweet Game Cover

About

Star Sweet is a single player action game. It was developed by LillyWelland inc. and was released on December 11, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

The goal is simple as a roasted cucumber. The gambling field is studded with jewels, you need to swipe the same diamonds in a row to clear the field.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

60%
Audience ScoreBased on 50 reviews
humor2 positive mentions
grinding3 negative mentions

  • Offers a large number of levels (around 300), providing extensive gameplay and replay value.
  • Features two distinct game modes: Arcade Mode for fast-paced play and Classic Mode for relaxed, strategic play.
  • Has a bright, colorful, and clear visual style with simple mechanics, making it accessible and easy to pick up.
  • Gameplay heavily relies on luck (RNG) with frequent 'No More Moves' situations causing frustrating restarts and slowdowns.
  • The game is considered an asset flip with minimal innovation, lacking depth, story, meaningful progression, or unique features.
  • Technical issues like buggy achievements, progress not saving correctly, and clunky UI reduce overall user experience.
  • gameplay
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay offers a familiar and accessible match-three puzzle experience with simple mechanics, varied level goals, and different modes to maintain engagement, though it lacks significant innovation and can feel repetitive during extended play. It features a large number of puzzle stages and achievements catering to completionists, but some players find the mechanics occasionally tedious or unclear. While solid and easy for newcomers, it closely resembles existing titles and doesn't significantly reinvent the formula.

    • “Designed with accessibility and quick play sessions in mind, the game offers a colorful gem-matching experience built around simple mechanics, a large number of puzzle stages, and an extensive achievement system aimed at completion-focused players.”
    • “While the core gameplay remains familiar to anyone who has played similar puzzle titles, the game attempts to maintain engagement through varied level goals and different gameplay modes.”
    • “Its straightforward mechanics make it easy for newcomers to pick up and play, while the large number of levels and achievements offers long-term goals for dedicated players.”
    • “The gameplay relies entirely on the traditional match-three formula, and players who are already familiar with similar puzzle games may find that the mechanics offer little innovation.”
    • “As a result, extended play sessions can sometimes feel repetitive once the novelty of the mechanics begins to fade.”
    • “Very tedious match-3 game with partly unfair mechanics.”
  • music
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music provides a soothing and gentle background that fits the casual puzzle gameplay, though it consists of a single repetitive track that some players find becomes annoying over time. While not particularly memorable or varied, the soundtrack helps maintain a relaxed atmosphere and complements the game's chill vibe.

    • “Background music provides a gentle rhythm that complements the casual nature of the gameplay, while simple sound effects highlight gem matches and combo activations.”
    • “Wasn't expecting much from this one, but I keep coming back to play a few levels... if you're into match 3, the developer has put a bunch of levels, chilling music, plus some achievements.”
    • “The music is really soothing.”
    • “The music is just one song that goes on forever, so the soothing will become annoying.”
    • “You expect the background music to change, for music to change, you expect some story?”
    • “Music is repetitive and not at the same caliber as what is on the product Steam page video.”
  • graphics
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are colorful and polished but somewhat generic, lacking the distinctive art style and creativity seen in top-tier puzzle games. While visually appealing, they do not stand out compared to leading titles in the match-3 genre.

    • “Beautiful visuals, stunning audio design and an overall fantastic game.”
    • “While the visuals are colorful and functional, they lack the distinctive art direction or thematic creativity found in some other modern puzzle games.”
    • “The graphics are polished but mediocre.”
    • “The graphics are not very appealing compared to the hits in the match-3 category like Montezuma.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users find the grinding aspect of the game tedious and frustrating, citing repetitive match-3 mechanics combined with a strong element of luck that makes progression feel unfair and unenjoyable.

    • “One of the most tedious things I've done in a long time.”
    • “Very tedious match-3 game with partly unfair mechanics.”
    • “I'm not a huge fan of match-3 in the first place, but this grindy, luck-based feeling I get from it sucks.”
  • stability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game’s stability is poor, with users frequently encountering bugs and a clunky, unstable user interface.

    • “The UI is quite clunky and buggy.”
    • “The game is buggy.”
  • story
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is criticized for being flat and unengaging, lacking meaningful development or dynamic elements like changing backgrounds or music. Users feel it fails to deliver on its initial promise, resulting in a disappointing and meaningless experience.

    • “It's like a promise of a story or promise that she would get naked or something, but nothing happens. It's an ugly, flat picture that doesn't move and has no meaning at all.”
    • “You expect the background to change, for music to change, you expect some story?”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's humor is initially strong, featuring explosive and energetic moments that players find genuinely funny.

    • “This game starts really funny.”
    • “All this bäm and boom and these explosions are really funny.”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization aspect is focused on encouraging players to refine their gameplay and replay stages to achieve better performance, catering especially to achievement hunters aiming to unlock all badges.

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers strong replayability for players who enjoy methodically completing achievement lists, enhancing long-term engagement.

    • “For players who enjoy methodically completing achievement lists on Steam, this feature can add significant replay value.”
  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is relaxed and fitting for a casual puzzle game, supported adequately by a non-memorable but suitable soundtrack.

  • monetization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's monetization is widely criticized for unethical practices, including repeatedly releasing low-quality, derivative content on Steam primarily to generate quick profits.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Star Sweet

35h Median play time
35h Average play time
35-35h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Star Sweet
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Star Sweet is a action game.

Star Sweet is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 35 hours playing Star Sweet.

Star Sweet was released on December 11, 2017.

Star Sweet was developed by LillyWelland inc..

Star Sweet has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its gameplay.

Star Sweet is a single player game.

Similar games include Lucid, Season Match, 7 Wonders: Ancient Alien Makeover, Lines Infinite, Luxor 2 HD and others.