Skip to main content

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition

41%Game Brain Score
atmosphere, humor
graphics, optimization
41% User Score Based on 1,582 reviews

Platforms

Xbox Series X|SPCXbox OneXboxWindows

About

Back to where it all started — the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Trilogy, one of the most visionary and groundbreaking survival first-person-shooters of all time returns. Now upscaled, enhanced must-play journey for a new generation. S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl, the first chapter of the Legends of the Zone Trilogy, which started it all. Welcome to the former exclusion territory near the Chornobyl Nucle…

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition screenshot
Skip User Reviews

41%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,582 reviews
atmosphere10 positive mentions
graphics50 negative mentions

  • The game offers improved controller support and Steam Workshop integration, making it more accessible for modern players.
  • Some graphical enhancements, such as improved lighting and texture quality, provide a fresh look to the classic game.
  • The remaster is free for existing owners of the original trilogy, allowing fans to revisit the game without additional cost.
  • The visuals are excessively blurry, even at maximum settings, making it difficult to enjoy the game.
  • Significant censorship has removed Russian voice acting and Soviet-era references, detracting from the game's original atmosphere.
  • The game suffers from performance issues and bugs that were not present in the original version, leading to a frustrating experience.
  • graphics
    380 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the enhanced edition of "Shadow of Chernobyl" have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that the visuals appear blurry and lack significant improvements over the original. While some minor enhancements, such as updated textures and lighting, are acknowledged, the overall consensus is that the game often looks worse than its predecessor, with many recommending the use of mods for a better visual experience. Additionally, performance issues and a lack of proper graphical options have further contributed to the disappointment among fans.

    • “The sky is colorful and amazing to look at, the X-ray engine DirectX 10 revolutionary 2008 features are included, a plethora of new graphical techniques layered on top tastefully, also easier to see those in action now including motion blur, screen space reflections, and depth of field.”
    • “Graphics are noticeably improved over originals, and controls are better than my custom Steam input profile due to faster inventory management and being able to click through dialogue trees with dpad and face buttons.”
    • “Not many changes have been made, but the enhanced graphics—especially the lighting—make it feel much better and more immersive.”
    • “Holy shit they massacred the visuals of this game.”
    • “The graphics are supposed to be better, but instead are just a blurry mess.”
    • “Graphics look awful and barely upgraded; mods do this for free and enhance the game while making the graphics a lot more up to date and better than this enhanced edition.”
  • optimization
    120 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising solid performance improvements and smoother gameplay, particularly on higher-end hardware and the Steam Deck. However, many others report significant issues, including poor visual clarity, stuttering, and bugs that were not present in the original version, leading to frustration over the overall optimization quality. While some users appreciate the nostalgic feel and free upgrades, the consensus indicates that the game still requires further optimization to meet player expectations.

    • “Performance is solid on my end.”
    • “This edition brings performance improvements, quality-of-life features, achievements, and a faithful visual upgrade – and all of that at no cost.”
    • “Now with this free remaster (more modern improvement), all problems are solved and the game works like a dream, and I've no complaints about performance or crashes, etc. All thumbs up here!”
    • “Burned myself with Stalker 2; horrible performance and non-existent AI.”
    • “It's poorly optimized, bugs that didn't exist in the original exist in this version, and the worst part is all references to the former USSR and Russia have been removed.”
    • “Abysmal performance, looks blurry (they are probably trying to gaslight us into thinking Stalker 2 looks normal), you're better off playing the original.”
  • gameplay
    66 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the enhanced edition has received mixed feedback, with some players appreciating the RPG elements and smoother mechanics, while others criticize the combat and various gameplay changes that feel awkward or simplified. Many users noted performance improvements and the potential for modding, but also expressed frustration over visual issues and missing features from previous versions. Overall, while the game offers a nostalgic experience with some modern updates, it struggles with inconsistencies that detract from the overall enjoyment.

    • “Even though they look old, the gameplay itself does not feel old.”
    • “From what I played so far, the game got a better feeling when playing. I don't remember the original, but the gameplay feels smooth, which is good. Some of the visuals do look a little blurry even with settings on and off like FSR, hoping to see a fix on this as well.”
    • “Shadow of Chernobyl – Enhanced Edition revitalizes the 2007 classic with improved visuals, refined gameplay mechanics, and enhanced stability.”
    • “As for the gameplay itself, I love the RPG elements, but the combat is horrible.”
    • “This severely impacts the gameplay experience.”
    • “There are so many weird changes to gameplay that make the game feel awkward, such as mouse acceleration you can't turn off and not being able to rename saves.”
  • stability
    56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting various bugs and glitches, including crashes and graphical issues like blurriness and inconsistent UI elements. While some users have noted that it runs well on modern hardware and appreciate the updated graphics, others have experienced significant performance problems, particularly with freezing and configuration settings not saving. Overall, while the game shows potential, its stability issues detract from the experience for a considerable number of players.

    • “Game runs great, it's a tweaked version of the original, not a remake, so it lost none of the atmosphere and charm.”
    • “Runs great on modern hardware and doesn't need to be fussed with.”
    • “I have not had any performance issues and it runs great.”
    • “I was lowkey hyped by this but right after starting the new game I found out it looks weirdly blurry for some reason, it also runs super bad, way worse than the original release (seems like dx9 lighting is not an option anymore) and doesn't help that the settings seem to be broken, make your own custom graphic setting and it will somehow reset itself, and I would like to say more but immediately after opening Sidorovich's door the game just freezes and there's no way to stop it.”
    • “Game is full of glitches and bugs that we didn't have in the original; also, graphics look worse than before.”
    • “Blurry graphics, eye-pain-inducing font, random glitches and crashes, deleting the best Russian voiceover, and deleting every Soviet symbol (yes, even the goddamned sign with the name of the plant).”
  • atmosphere
    28 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's atmosphere is widely praised for its eerie, immersive qualities reminiscent of the Metro series, with a haunting world that effectively draws players into its perilous setting. However, some players express disappointment over changes that detract from the original atmosphere, particularly the removal of Soviet elements and political themes that they feel undermine the game's charm. Overall, the atmosphere remains a standout feature, celebrated for its storytelling and tension, despite concerns about censorship and modifications in certain versions.

    • “The game's haunting atmosphere and immersive world-building remain standout features, drawing players into the perilous exclusion zone.”
    • “It's atmospheric as hell, legit scary in places, the gunfights are tense and hard, it's kinda clunky and weird but you can drink vodka until you are so shitfaced the screen starts shaking.”
    • “I love Stalker and love that the enhanced editions allow even more people to play one of the most atmospheric series ever made.”
    • “You ruined the atmosphere by putting political elements into the game.”
    • “Censored console ports lacking some gameplay features, looks great, runs great, mods from the original still work, but it's disgusting what they did to the atmosphere of the game.”
    • “The Soviet posters, which were part of the atmosphere, are also removed, and I don't understand why they are so obsessed with renaming Chernobyl to Chornobyl.”
  • monetization
    26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many users labeling it a "cash grab" due to the presence of ads on the main menu and perceived low effort in the game's enhancements. Players express frustration over technical issues like crashes and blurry graphics, suggesting that the focus on profit over quality has detracted from the overall experience. While some acknowledge that returning players received the update for free, the general sentiment leans towards disappointment in the game's direction and execution.

    • “Nothing more than a woke virtue signal and a cash grab; the GSC that made these games are not the same people pushing out this rubbish now.”
    • “I think the fact they're willing to go as far as advertising their own game in other games comes to show they're focused on profits rather than actual solid game releases, again, western dev mentality.”
    • “I don't see why these versions exist; it borders on a cash grab.”
  • story
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story has sparked mixed reactions, particularly regarding the removal of Russian assets, which some players feel undermines the legacy of the series. While many appreciate the atmosphere and storytelling, there are concerns about inconsistencies in language use among characters and technical issues that disrupt gameplay. Overall, the narrative remains engaging, but the changes have led to debates about cultural representation within the game's context.

    • “It's fantastic to relive those classics today, wonderful atmosphere and storytelling.”
    • “The characters speak different languages (the plot characters speak English, the rest in Russian and Ukrainian), that is, in three languages! It's an interesting approach to storytelling.”
    • “I get it, they hate Russia; but Russia is as much a part of Stalker as Ukraine is since it's literally part of the storyline of the game. Now they're trying to wash Russia out of their game, which means they're tarnishing their own legacy all due to 'Russia bad.' That being said, they've removed Russian assets from the game, which include visual and probably audio, although I did not confirm the audio but I did confirm the missing visual assets.”
    • “The characters speak different languages (the plot characters speak English, the rest in Russian and Ukrainian, that is, in three languages!!!) with the same language setting; it's unbearable to listen to.”
    • “End of story.”
  • humor
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the reviews stems from the game's "enhanced" editions being perceived as comically inferior to the originals, with users finding amusement in the poor graphics, awkward controls, and questionable design choices. The irony of censorship complaints from Russian players, alongside the game's lack of quality control, adds to the hilarity, making it a source of unintentional comedy for many. Overall, the consensus is that the game's failures are so pronounced that they become entertaining in their absurdity.

    • “These 'enhanced' editions are hilarious in a lot of ways, mainly because they actually look worse than the original games they are trying to profit off of.”
    • “Reading the negative comments from Russians complaining about the removal of stuff they can just watch on their state-controlled media, and now all of a sudden having a problem with censorship, is nothing short of hilarious.”
    • “- he looks hilarious, it's so bad it's actually good.”
  • music
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some users finding it underwhelming and poorly mixed, often too quiet compared to other sound elements. Additionally, there are criticisms regarding the thematic choices, with some feeling that the music does not align well with the game's atmosphere. Overall, players suggest that the original soundtrack is a better alternative.

    • “No footstep sound effects, music is too quiet in the mix. Just play the original.”
    • “Starts with the title of the game (should be Chernobyl, not Chornobyl) and then through voice pack, textures, references, music.”
    • “I thought my favorite music was J-rock, but it turned out to be the whining of Russians who realized that the world doesn't revolve around them.”
  • replayability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players appreciate the replayability of the trilogy, noting that the remastered versions feel fresh and enjoyable, even for those who usually struggle with older games. The improved playability enhances the overall experience, making it easier to revisit the titles.

    • “I typically really struggle playing older games, but I find this trilogy much more playable than most games that are this dated.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be a significant drawback, noting that encounters become repetitive and tedious, particularly during long-distance gunfights. The experience is further marred by visual issues, such as blurry vegetation, which detracts from the overall enjoyment.

    • “Encounters are repetitive and grindy.”
    • “Get used to blurry vegetation and tedious long-distance gunfights near the end of the game.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition

4h Median play time
35h Average play time
3-98h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 6 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition

Games Like S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chornobyl - Enhanced Edition

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Prypiat - Enhanced Edition Image
This game contains adult content
Mafia II: Definitive Edition Image
STAR WARS: Battlefront Classic Collection Image
Chrono Cross: The Radical Dreamers Edition Image
METAL GEAR SOLID - Master Collection Version Image
This game contains adult content
Skip Game News