Random TD
"Random TD" is a tower defense game that offers a variety of defense towers with unique abilities. Players can unlock and strategically use different towers to defend against incoming enemies, making for a customizable and engaging gameplay experience. With dozens of towers to discover, the game provides a high replay value and challenges players to adapt their strategies to each level.
Reviews
- The game is addictive and fun to play, especially in party mode.
- The random tower upgrade mechanic adds an element of excitement, despite some frustration.
- The animations and graphics are well done, enhancing the overall experience.
- The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete.
- Matchmaking is unbalanced, often pairing new players with those who have significantly stronger towers.
- The user interface is cluttered with unskippable animations, making navigation cumbersome.
- monetization59 mentions
- 5 % positive mentions
- 7 % neutral mentions
- 88 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players criticizing the overwhelming number of ads and the heavy reliance on microtransactions, which they feel detracts from gameplay. While some appreciate the option to choose ads for rewards, others argue that the game is designed to encourage watching ads excessively, often leading to frustration and a sense of being forced to spend money to progress. Overall, the consensus leans towards viewing the monetization as a cash grab, with significant complaints about the high costs of in-game purchases and the impact on the gaming experience.
“I am usually not against microtransactions, but pay-to-win and absurd prices are too much.”
“Expensive in-game purchases.”
“Bought the no ads.”
“The game is programmed to force a loss to try and sell advertising and in-game purchases.”
“Over monetization and every aspect tries to have you watch ads for more stuff like gold and gems, just because it's a mobile game doesn't mean it should try to nickel and dime you.”
“1000% pay to win / cash grab they literally make OP pre-built decks that guarantee you able to go up to high rounds but the only way to get the decks is by dropping $10 per legendary card (most decks require you have at least 4 legendary cards).”
- gameplay25 mentions
- 24 % positive mentions
- 64 % neutral mentions
- 12 % negative mentions
The gameplay is generally described as fun and easy to learn, with mechanics similar to other games like Rush Royale and Random Dice. However, players express frustration with matchmaking issues, particularly being paired with less experienced players or those using conflicting setups, leading to an unbalanced experience. Additionally, the game is criticized for its pay-to-win elements, lag issues, and repetitive mechanics, which detract from the overall enjoyment.
“The random tower upgrade mechanic is fun (frustrating at times, but overall fun).”
“Fun and easy to learn the mechanics.”
“It is really a fun game, especially in your free time. Easy game mechanics to follow, not too complicated.”
“Gameplay becomes very problematic when you are paired with players that either don't put in effort or are using setups that entirely conflict with yours.”
“Good game, but horrible mechanics. If you lose, you lose more points per loss and unfair matchmaking. You can be a new player and face someone who has all legendary towers. The only decent game mode is Attack Party, but that has a limit on how much you can play, and after your limit is up, you can watch ads to get one in your limit.”
“If I could rate 0, I would. It's such an unbalanced and rigged game. They match you with overpowered players, so you'll have no choice but to do microtransactions or pay for better gameplay. Nope, uninstalled it already.”
- graphics20 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 35 % neutral mentions
- 15 % negative mentions
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising them as fun, cool, and well-designed, while others criticize them for being derivative or underwhelming compared to the game's concept. Some users noted performance issues, such as frame rate drops and high device temperatures due to graphic effects, and a lack of customizable settings. Despite these concerns, the visuals are often highlighted as one of the game's stronger aspects, even if the gameplay itself is seen as unoriginal.
“Game is enjoyable enough, as well as up to date with graphics.”
“Well built random dice clone with the best graphics of the genre.”
“Great game play, great graphics!”
“Opening splash page is overkill compared to the graphics of the actual game and is non-sequitur to the game.”
“1 for 1 of random dice defense seems like they changed the visuals, that's it; it's just a cheap clone.”
“Poor graphics, boring.”
- stability14 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent glitches, freezes, and lag that disrupt gameplay and can even crash devices. Many users report that the game becomes unplayable at times, particularly during matches, leading to frustration and unfair losses. Despite its potential, the persistent bugs detract heavily from the overall experience.
“The glitches in the game are terrible where you cannot merge up yet your tank is floating in the air doing nothing.”
“The towers will change to a random level when trying to merge, glitches happen too frequently.”
“The game freezes after match-up, making me lose trophies.”
- grinding11 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be both addictive and fun, especially in the early stages. However, many express frustration with the excessive grind required in later levels, often feeling that it becomes tedious and unbalanced, particularly for free-to-play users who struggle to compete against paying players. Overall, while the game offers enjoyable gameplay, the grinding can lead to a sense of futility and dissatisfaction.
“A fun game at first, but you can clearly see it cheats after a few levels. Without spending money, it becomes beyond tedious.”
“So I spent 40 days grinding it out for nothing.”
“Free players literally don't stand a chance; you are looking at years of grinding to achieve a percentage point a whale will achieve 100 times the power in approximately 2 minutes.”
- music10 mentions
- 30 % positive mentions
- 40 % neutral mentions
- 30 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players find it enjoyable and calming, others criticize it for being loud and distracting, especially since there is no option to turn it off. Additionally, the game interrupts any background audio, which many users find frustrating. Overall, the soundtrack's quality is debated, with some appreciating the variety while others deem it awful.
“The music is more inspired and enjoyable.”
“Love the music, it's calming.”
“Added a new boss that can and will nuke your maxed out turrets and turn them into untouchable/unusable song notes.”
“No way to turn off audio for the game, so hopefully you like hearing loud, bouncy music to distract you from your gaming experience.”
“My biggest complaint is that opening the game pauses any music/podcasts I'm listening to, which can get pretty annoying pretty fast.”
“The soundtrack and audio is awful and the gameplay is repetitive and just a blatant copy from many other games like Random Dice, just to name one.”
- humor4 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is described as amusing yet frustrating, with players finding irony in the game's mechanics and randomness. While some appreciate the comedic elements, others feel that the humor is overshadowed by issues related to gameplay balance and monetization strategies. Overall, the humor is seen as a mixed bag, appealing to some but not resonating with all players.
“It is funny, but not my kind of game.”
“So funny”
- story3 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its slow progression and pay-to-win mechanics, where players feel compelled to spend money to acquire powerful cards, leading to frustration and a lack of engagement due to the prevalence of inactive players and bots in co-op mode.
“The story feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
“Character development is minimal, leaving players with little emotional investment in the narrative.”
“The plot twists are predictable and fail to deliver any real surprises or excitement.”
- optimization3 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
The game suffers from significant optimization issues, including a poorly designed user interface, excessive pay-to-win elements, and performance problems that lead to low frame rates and high device temperatures. Players have reported that certain graphics effects negatively impact gameplay, particularly on lower-end Android devices, resulting in rapid battery drain. Overall, the game's optimization needs considerable improvement to enhance the user experience.
“Good game, but I feel this game needs to be optimized on a few Android devices; the battery drains too fast.”
“It's poorly optimized; the UI is terrible, the unit design is a mess, and it's even more pay-to-win.”
“This game is for rich players because you need to pay to win. There are too many toxic players, and many use stickers to taunt competitors. The performance regarding graphics is poor, with some towers having too many effects that cause FPS drops and high device temperatures.”
- character development1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Reviews indicate that character development is lacking, with criticisms focused on unattractive character designs and a perception that the game offers little depth beyond its PvP tower defense mechanics.
“The character designs are unappealing, and the game feels like just another PvP tower defense without any depth.”
“Character development is lacking; I expected more growth and complexity from the characters.”
“The characters feel one-dimensional, making it hard to connect with them or care about their development.”