Run'N'Get
- November 12, 2018
- TonAme
Help your hero collect flowers and presents and run as long as you can!
Reviews
Audience ScoreBased on 11 reviews
monetization2 negative mentions
- Some players find the game entertaining and a relaxing experience.
- There is potential for improvement with future updates, particularly in boss battles.
- A few users appreciate the game's simplicity and casual nature.
- The game is criticized for being an asset flip with low-quality graphics and minimal effort put into development.
- Controls cannot be customized, making it difficult for differently-abled gamers to play.
- The game has very low player engagement and is marked as 'Profile Features Limited' on Steam, indicating poor sales and community acceptance.
- monetization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization of the game has been criticized as a cash grab, with users highlighting a lack of credit to original artists and developers, which raises concerns about plagiarism. The overall sentiment suggests that the game offers minimal value for its price, reinforcing the perception of it being a low-effort product.
“It's important to note that the developers didn't credit any of the artists or actual game developers who created the assets, which feels like plagiarism and a cash grab.”
“This really must be some kind of joke, especially with the price tag... absolutely minimum viable product cash grab stuff.”
- graphics1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The graphics have been widely criticized for their low resolution and poor quality, leading many users to feel that the visual aspect of the game does not justify any financial investment.
“Not worth any money; the resolution is low and the graphics quality is miserable.”
“The graphics look outdated and lack detail, making the game feel unpolished.”
“I was disappointed by the bland textures and poor character models; it feels like a step back.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative