Ruin City Gasolina

About

Ruin City Gasolina is a single player action game. It was developed by LillyWelland inc. and was released on August 16, 2017. It received negative reviews from players.

Eliminate the invasion of mechanical invaders and save what remains of the once great city.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

34%

Audience ScoreBased on 77 reviews

music6 positive mentions

monetization4 negative mentions

The game offers easy achievements, allowing players to unlock all 27 by simply pressing each letter on the keyboard.
Some players found the graphics to be quite nice, adding a visual appeal to the otherwise lackluster gameplay.
The game is very cheap, making it an option for those looking for a quick and easy way to boost their achievement count.

The game is essentially an asset flip with no meaningful content, featuring a lack of enemies and gameplay mechanics.
Players reported numerous technical issues, including the ability to clip out of bounds and a lack of any interactive elements.
The sound design is poor, with loud and inconsistent audio levels that detract from the experience.

music
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
10%
30%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players appreciate the cool soundtrack and find it suitable for fun, lighthearted settings, others criticize the main menu music for being excessively loud and note that in-game silence can be frustrating. Additionally, one gun's sound effects are described as having a musical quality.
- “The music might be good for recording on a loop, to give your 6-year-old kid to play, while they trick-or-treat for Halloween, dressed as a robot or zombie.”
- “+nice soundtrack”
- “Game is just awesome, the music is cool.”
- “The main menu music is loud, and I mean loud; in-game, the silence is annoying as hell.”
- “The main menu music is loud, and I mean loud; in-game, the silence is annoying as hell.”
- “At least one gun sounds kind of like music when firing.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
34%
22%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players praising it as excellent, while others criticize it for being lacking or non-functional. Despite the game's appealing visuals, many feel that the gameplay does not justify its price, with some even suggesting it is not worth playing at any cost. Overall, the consensus indicates significant dissatisfaction with the gameplay experience.
- “10/10 gameplay”
- “I literally got every achievement in about 10 seconds of total gameplay.”
- “The city is beautiful, the gameplay is awful.”
graphics
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
11%
22%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the visuals as "beautiful" and "quite nice," while others criticize the overall quality, describing it as lacking depth and relying on minimal assets. Despite a few high ratings, many players feel that the graphics do not compensate for the game's other shortcomings.
- “10/10 visuals”
- “+ beautiful graphics”
- “+ the graphics are actually quite nice”
- “This is the worst thing that I've played on Steam so far because there's nothing to it and it just seems like a few assets and a desert map with hills inserted into a top-down view so nobody has to worry about graphics.”
- “Visuals are pretty good, though not good enough to make up for all the other problems.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized for being exploitative, with accusations of plagiarism and unethical practices, as the developers fail to credit original artists and instead rely on repackaging others' work for profit. This pattern of behavior has led to perceptions of the game as a cash grab and low-quality shovelware.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
- “There is a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, through this account or closely linked/alternate accounts.”
- “The developers have shown a consistent pattern of exploiting others' work for profit, making this a blatant cash grab.”
atmosphere
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Users express disappointment with the game's atmosphere, specifically noting a lack of a convincing post-apocalyptic setting. The absence of immersive environmental details detracts from the overall experience.
- “Where is your post-apocalyptic atmosphere?”