Quad Hopping

About

Quad Hopping is a single player action game. It was developed by LillyWelland inc. and was released on August 23, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

The simplest puzzle game is the reaction and the ability to make quick decisions. As we move, we score points and the game gradually accelerates, it is already harder to catch up on the cherished platform to jump even further, to a greater result.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

41%

Audience ScoreBased on 37 reviews

humor1 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Easy to achieve 100% completion by simply pressing all keys on the keyboard.
Very cheap, making it accessible for those looking for a quick achievement boost.
Can serve as a time-waster for players seeking a simple, casual experience.

Lacks clear goals or objectives, making gameplay feel aimless and unengaging.
Poor graphics and controls, reminiscent of low-quality Flash games, detracting from the overall experience.
The game is essentially an asset flip with no real innovation or effort put into its design.

graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The graphics of the game have been criticized for their low quality and lack of customization options, leaving players unable to adjust resolution or improve visuals. Many users feel that the graphics are subpar, even for a budget title, failing to meet the expectations of PC gamers.
- “There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low-quality graphics.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy has been criticized for being unethical, with accusations of the developer exploiting others' work for profit through cheap cash grabs on Steam, often using linked or alternate accounts.
- “They have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, either through this account or through closely linked/alternate accounts.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without spending extra money.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay has been widely criticized, with users expressing strong dissatisfaction and deeming it unworthy of purchase due to its poor quality and lack of engaging content.
- “I'm not even going to comment on the gameplay; it's just not worth talking about.”
- “This game sucks. It shouldn't cost money; it has bad gameplay, bad music, and really nothing to it.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has been criticized as poor, contributing to an overall negative perception of the game's quality and value.
- “This game sucks; it shouldn't cost money. It has bad gameplay, bad music, and really nothing to it.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's story is noted for its engaging narrative, though specific details about the plot and character development are not provided in the user feedback. Overall, players find the storyline to be a significant aspect of the game experience.
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is noted for its humor, providing a comedic experience, but some users feel that it does not justify its price of 1.11€.