The game is fun to try and play through, offering an okay level of enjoyment.
It has a perfect price point for its short playtime.
The music is enjoyable and adds to the overall experience.
The game is criticized for being a low-quality asset flip with no real merit or value.
It suffers from bugs and crashes, making it difficult to run properly.
There are concerns about fake positive reviews and review manipulation surrounding the game.
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
The game's story is polarizing; while some players find it lacking or minimal, others appreciate its charm and the cute elements woven into the narrative. Overall, it seems to cater to those who enjoy lighthearted storytelling rather than an epic plot.
“An epic story that captivates from start to finish.”
“A nice little story; I like how cute and poignant elements are blended together.”
“The narrative is engaging and keeps you invested in the characters.”
“This game has no story.”
“The narrative is completely lacking and fails to engage the player.”
“I found the plot to be shallow and uninteresting.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
100%
The graphics in the game are praised for their amazing artwork and design, although some users feel that graphics are not a crucial aspect of the overall experience.
“The artwork and game design are amazing!”
“The graphics are outdated and lack detail.”
“The visual style feels bland and uninspired.”
“The character models look low-quality and poorly designed.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of this game has been heavily criticized as a blatant cash grab, characterized by the use of copied assets and templates, and a low price point of $8. Reviewers highlight the developers' history of similar practices, including the use of fake accounts to generate misleading reviews, further undermining the game's credibility and value.
“The status of this game as nothing but an asset/template flip/cash grab is cemented by the developers' prior history of asset flip/construction kit copy-and-paste jobs, the fake/compromised Steam accounts they used to write fake reviews (all with the same broken English), the laughable $8 USD price tag for this garbage, and the way they dumped it into dailyindiegame bundles immediately at launch.”
“These developers do nothing but copy asset store assets and game tutorials, fill out a few things, stamp out basic levels using construction kit templates, and dump them on Steam and into dailyindiegame bundles as cash grabs.”
“The reviews are all written in either Russian or broken English, appear almost immediately after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game has received positive feedback, with users highlighting its quality and effectiveness in enhancing the overall experience. The soundtrack is noted for being engaging and well-composed, contributing significantly to the game's atmosphere.
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Users highlight that the game offers infinite replayability, suggesting that players can enjoy it repeatedly without diminishing returns.
“Infinitely replayable.”
“The game offers endless possibilities for different playthroughs.”
“Each decision leads to unique outcomes, making you want to experience it all over again.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is frequently criticized for being buggy and clunky, indicating significant stability issues that detract from the overall experience.
“The game is incredibly buggy and feels clunky.”
“I experienced frequent crashes that ruined my gameplay.”
“The stability issues make it hard to enjoy the game.”