rFactor

About

rFactor is a single player and multiplayer racing game. It was developed by Image Space Incorporated and was released on March 2, 2015. It received very positive reviews from players.

rFactor is a computer racing simulator, designed with the ability to run any type of four-wheeled vehicle from street cars to open wheel cars of any era. rFactor aimed to be the most accurate race simulator of its time. Released in November 2005, rFactor did not have much competition in this market; however it featured many technical advances in tire modeling, complex aerodynamics and a 15 degrees…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+12

Skip User Reviews

91%

Audience ScoreBased on 598 reviews

gameplay8 positive mentions

story2 negative mentions

The game has an extensive modding community, providing a vast array of cars and tracks that enhance gameplay significantly.
Despite its age, the physics and driving mechanics are still highly regarded, making it a solid choice for sim racing enthusiasts.
The game is accessible on low-end PCs, allowing a wide range of players to enjoy it without needing high specifications.

The base game lacks content, making it feel barebones without the addition of mods.
The user interface is outdated and can be confusing, which may deter new players from fully enjoying the game.
There are technical issues reported, such as crashes and problems with modern wheel compatibility, which can hinder the experience.

graphics
100 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
60%
20%
The graphics of this game, released in 2005, are generally considered outdated by modern standards, yet many players appreciate their solid performance for the time. While some reviews describe the visuals as "meh" or "shocking," others note that the graphics still hold up reasonably well, especially when compared to other racing simulations of its era. Overall, the game's focus on gameplay and physics often outweighs its graphical limitations, making it appealing to those who prioritize simulation over visuals.
- “It's important to realize this game was released way back in 2005, but in spite of its age, the graphics hold up extremely well.”
- “This along with the graphic upgrades in AMS1 are at the top of any racing sim you could ever play.”
- “For 2006, the graphics are pretty good.”
- “Also, since this is a very old game, the graphics look outdated by today's standards.”
- “The downsides of rf1 compared to other sim racing titles are: rudimentary AI of the computer-controlled drivers, and obviously dated graphics.”
- “Worst game I've played in a long time, shocking graphics, shocking sounds, overall the worst game ever, don't waste your money and time on it.”
gameplay
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
54%
13%
The gameplay of Rfactor is praised for its depth and variety, offering a wide range of mods and mechanics that enhance the sim racing experience, particularly for drifting. While some users appreciate the fun and engaging gameplay despite the outdated graphics, others criticize it as horrid, indicating a divide in player satisfaction. Overall, Rfactor remains a significant title in the sim racing genre, especially for those who prioritize gameplay over visuals.
- “Rfactor has many great mechanics and is a true staple to sim racing, especially for the time it was released.”
- “A pure joy in the gameplay department and you won’t be disappointed.”
- “Any car, any track, almost limitless options and in-depth sim mechanics.”
- “It's an old game, of course it won't have the same graphics or gameplay as newer games like Assetto Corsa or Project Cars. I use this game for drifting; it's amazing with the Project D mod. There are what seems like millions of mods for this game. If you want racing mods, they have them. If you want drift mods, they have them. There are graphic mods like ENB if you don't like the old graphics; there are even truck mods.”
- “Some people think graphics matter, some don't care about it and just want the gameplay.”
- “It's just gameplay.”
optimization
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
Overall, the optimization of the game is praised for its solid performance and stability, even on lower-end PCs. Users recommend specific settings, such as enabling process affinity for all cores, using high-performance power plans, and adjusting NVIDIA settings to enhance performance and reduce stuttering.
- “Tons of mods, great physics, performance, stability, and a lot of memories.”
- “Finally, there's great performance even if you have a lesser powered PC.”
- “Performance is really solid for me.”
- “Tips: set process affinity for all cores to on, make sure you run in high performance mode power plan, set NVIDIA to high performance modes and use V-Sync and triple buffering to get rid of stuttering if you see it.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The reviews indicate that the game lacks a story, with multiple users noting the absence of any narrative elements.
- “No story.”
- “No story.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express that the grinding in the game is excessively time-consuming, often requiring a significant investment of time akin to having a "second life" to keep up with the demands.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is noted for its age-related bugs, which can affect stability, but many users still find it to be a perfect experience overall. While the graphics may not impress, the realism is considered exceptional for its time.