Real Farm

About

"Real Farm" is a farming simulation game that allows players to start as a farmhand and work their way up to an agricultural tycoon in career mode, or manage an established farm in free mode. The game features two maps based on American and West European countryside, where players can acquire land, manage staff, crops, and animals, and drive powerful farm vehicles. The economy is affected by player and competitor actions in real time, making for a dynamic and challenging gameplay experience. The game boasts a huge, open world presented in sumptuous native 4k.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

46%

Audience ScoreBased on 104 reviews

graphics6 positive mentions

grinding48 negative mentions

The game has good graphics and runs smoothly on various systems.
It offers a basic introduction to farming mechanics, making it suitable for newcomers to the genre.
The developers are actively working on updates and improvements, showing potential for future enhancements.

The game is plagued with bugs and issues that severely impact gameplay, making it frustrating and unplayable at times.
There is no steering wheel support, which is a significant drawback for a driving simulation game.
The controls are difficult to master, and the overall experience lacks depth and enjoyment compared to established farming simulators.

grinding
48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews highlight that the grinding aspect of the game involves repetitive and tedious tasks, such as plowing and sowing, which can feel overwhelming, especially in the early stages of career mode. While some players appreciate the game's realistic approach to farming, many express disappointment in the lack of engaging gameplay and interesting decisions, comparing it unfavorably to established titles like Farming Simulator. Overall, the grinding experience is seen as a significant drawback, making the game less appealing for those seeking a more dynamic farming simulation.
- “Dry career mode: work your ass off to pay debt, therefore dozens of repetitive tedious jobs of plowing, cultivating, and sowing.”
- “Gameplay felt really tedious.”
- “Aside from that, I thought I'd learn something about farming, but this doesn't give any form of 'farming fantasy' and has such generic activities that it doesn't feel real - sure the large scale monoculture repetitiveness is realistic, but where are the interesting decisions?”
graphics
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
44%
19%
The graphics of the game are generally considered good, with some users appreciating the field textures and overall visual quality. However, there are mixed feelings about the graphics not meeting expectations, and some players noted that bugs and minor issues detracted from the experience. While the default settings offer high-quality visuals, some players opted to lower the settings for performance reasons.
- “Music is nice, graphics are nice.”
- “Good graphics.”
- “In my opinion, this could have been a good game if the developers had ironed out more bugs in the game. Some parts work really well, like the field textures and general graphics, but it's the little things that ruin it for me.”
- “Ok graphics, but not close to what I was expecting.”
- “I would not have minded a larger file size or graphics rendering...”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The story of the game is praised for its amazing idea and potential, but players express frustration with bugs that hinder mission completion, such as un-obtainable items and the need to cancel missions prematurely. Overall, while the narrative concept is strong, technical issues significantly detract from the experience.
- “Amazing idea and amazing story and amazing potential.”
- “Well, items needed to complete missions are unobtainable.”
- “Don't get to do the full mission before you are finished.”
- “Fix the bugs (cannot complete the mission, cannot buy seeds and fertilizer, etc.).”
gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
13%
50%
38%
Gameplay is criticized for its tediousness and lack of automation, making early development challenging and requiring significant financial investment to improve efficiency. Players also note that the game mechanics and physics need enhancement or clearer explanations, alongside better user interface support, such as tutorials or voice prompts.
- “The game mechanics and physics should be better explained, and maybe more UI elements could be added in tutorials, such as voice prompts or guided instructions.”
- “Biggest problems you can see within a few minutes of gameplay.”
- “Gameplay felt really tedious.”
- “The game mechanics and physics should be better (or at least better explained), and maybe more UI in tutorials, such as a voice prompt or directed guidance.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players appreciate its quality, others find it inconsistent and jarring, leading to moments of surprise that can be overwhelming. Overall, the music is described as nice but suffers from timing issues that detract from the experience.
- “The music is nice, the graphics are nice.”
- “The music is nice, the graphics are nice.”
- “The music is so terrible; well, it's not, but it's off half of the time, and then it comes on and gives you a heart attack.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Users express frustration with the monetization strategy, particularly highlighting that the ads are intrusive and annoying.
- “The ads are incredibly intrusive and ruin the gameplay experience.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative and takes away from the enjoyment of the game.”
- “I feel pressured to spend money just to keep up with other players.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is widely criticized, with multiple users describing it as a "buggy broken mess," indicating significant issues that hinder gameplay.
- “Buggy broken mess.”
- “Buggy broken mess.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The game is criticized for having zero replayability, indicating that players find little incentive to revisit it after completing the initial experience.
- “Zero replayability.”
- “Zero replayability.”
- “Zero replayability.”