RC Simulation 2.0

About

RC Simulation 2.0 is a single player and multiplayer racing game. It was developed by devotid and was released on July 15, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

RC Simulation 2.0 offers a realistic radio-controlled vehicle experience with detailed models and physics. Customize and build your own RC vehicles, then take them for a spin in various environments including off-road tracks, stunt parks, and racing circuits. Compete in online multiplayer matches or hone your skills in single-player mode.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

+24

Skip User Reviews

67%

Audience ScoreBased on 200 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

graphics6 negative mentions

RC Simulation 2.0 offers a wide variety of vehicles, including cars, boats, planes, and drones, providing players with a diverse sandbox experience.
The game features a robust track editor and Steam Workshop support, allowing players to create and share custom tracks, significantly extending the game's replayability.
The developer is actively engaged with the community, frequently updating the game and addressing player feedback, which shows promise for future improvements.

The game suffers from inconsistent physics and controls, making it difficult for players to achieve a realistic driving experience, especially for those familiar with real RC vehicles.
Many players report technical issues, including crashes, poor performance, and unresponsive controls, which detract from the overall enjoyment of the game.
The graphics and sound design are considered basic and lack the polish found in higher-budget simulations, leading to a less immersive experience.

graphics
24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The graphics of RC Simulation 2.0 are generally described as mediocre, with many users noting that they resemble outdated Unity visuals and lack significant polish or innovation. While some elements, like the moving parts of vehicles, are appreciated, overall performance issues and long loading times detract from the experience. Many reviewers express hope for future improvements as the game is still in development.
- “Amazing graphics/lighting effects”
- “Rcsim2 may not have ground-breaking graphics but what it does have are good enough to enjoy the game.”
- “I'm running this on Linux with open source Radeon (r600) drivers on an APU (A10-5800K) and it's fairly smooth at 'beautiful' graphical options.”
- “While this presentation supports performance and accessibility, it reinforces the sense that RC Simulation 2.0 prioritizes scope and flexibility over aesthetic polish.”
- “Needs a lot of work still, the graphics are poor and you cannot see the car if it's on the far side of the track, the menu system is bad and the physics are a good start but need a lot of work.”
- “No game should have performance as bad as this, especially when the graphics look like something that came from an old Xbox game!”
stability
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game currently experiences a range of glitches and stability issues, which are typical for a pre-release title. While some players find these bugs amusing, others report significant frustrations, such as freezing and loading problems. Overall, despite the stability concerns, many users appreciate the game's potential and customization options, indicating that improvements may come as development continues.
- “It just freezes or won't load every time.”
- “Don't buy garbage; so many glitches I thought my computer was gonna break.”
- “I bought this so I could practice fixed wing, as I just bought a couple of RC planes. As LA Guns states in his review, things to date are a bit broken, buggy, and need a shedload of polish.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The gameplay is noted for its realistic sound and visuals, reflecting the developers' passion for RC cars, but it suffers from confusing mechanics and physics that can lead to frequent tipping. While the controls are polished for an early access title, players desire more intuitive tutorials for newcomers and the addition of a car editor for customization. Overall, the game offers enjoyable hours of play, especially in testing creations and exploring user-generated content.
- “You can tell the devs love RCs, because the sounds, the looks, and the gameplay are realistic.”
- “It is still in early access and yet the controls and game mechanics are very polished.”
- “Very enjoyable: can provide hours of gameplay just screwing around, maybe testing your creations, or trying out what others have made.”
- “Unlike VRC Pro, or real driving for that matter, the views during gameplay do not correspond with how you would naturally follow an RC car.”
- “Gameplay, physics, effects, and menus all were pretty rough.”
- “One: the gameplay is confusing as hell.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The optimization of the game is criticized for inconsistent physics behavior across vehicle types, an unintuitive interface, and fluctuating performance based on track complexity and vehicle count. Reviewers highlight poor graphics quality and significant performance issues, suggesting that the game prioritizes scope and flexibility over aesthetic refinement. Overall, the optimization leaves much to be desired, with some players expressing frustration over the game's performance.
- “Physics behavior varies in quality between vehicle types, the interface can be unintuitive, and performance may fluctuate depending on the complexity of tracks or number of active vehicles.”
- “While this presentation supports performance and accessibility, it reinforces the sense that RC Simulation 2.0 prioritizes scope and flexibility over aesthetic polish.”
- “No game should have performance as bad as this, especially when the graphics look like something that came from an old Xbox game!”
atmosphere
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere in the game is characterized by clear environmental and vehicle designs that effectively communicate their functions; however, it falls short in detail and immersive quality compared to higher-budget simulations.
- “Environments and vehicle models convey their purpose clearly but lack the detail and atmosphere seen in higher-budget simulations.”
- “The game feels sterile and lifeless, failing to immerse players in its world.”
- “Despite the interesting premise, the atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, making exploration feel tedious.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game lacks a traditional career mode and structured story progression, which has led to disappointment among players who prefer a more defined narrative and objectives.
- “There is no traditional career mode, story progression, or rigid set of objectives.”
- “I hate it... end of story”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in RC Simulation 2.0 is consistently present and well-received, with frequent updates that keep the content fresh. Players particularly enjoy the character Larry, who adds a comedic touch to the experience.
- “Without spoiling it, there is quite a bit of humor throughout RC Simulation 2.0, and there are updates often enough to know it is not forgotten.”
- “Plus, Larry is funny.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers high replayability, particularly appealing to RC enthusiasts and tinkerers, as it emphasizes freedom and flexibility over rigid structure, allowing for diverse gameplay experiences.
- “For RC enthusiasts, tinkerers, and players who value freedom over structure, it provides a uniquely flexible and replayable experience.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is not directly addressed in the provided text, which focuses on technical issues related to RC car setup and performance. As such, there is no significant emotional response or sentiment conveyed in this review.