Power & Revolution 2019 Edition

About

"Power & Revolution 2019 Edition" is a geopolitical simulator that allows you to play as the Head of State of any country and influence the world through strategic, simulation-based gameplay. With detailed representation of 100,000+ data points and 15,000+ texts, the game accurately recreates the current world across economic, political, military, and other domains. The 3D world map and recorded dialogue enhance the immersive experience as you try to change the destiny of the planet.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

Power & Revolution 2019 Edition screenshot

55%

Audience ScoreBased on 474 reviews

humor8 positive mentions

stability65 negative mentions

The game offers a unique and in-depth geopolitical simulation experience, allowing players to explore various political scenarios and strategies.
Players appreciate the educational aspect of the game, as it provides insights into real-world political and economic systems.
The game has a lot of potential for creativity and experimentation, with various paths to take in managing a country.

The game is plagued with numerous bugs and crashes, making it frustrating and often unplayable for many users.
The user interface is clunky and not user-friendly, leading to confusion and difficulty in navigating the game's features.
The developers have been criticized for their lack of support and updates, leaving many players feeling abandoned and dissatisfied with their purchase.

stability
67 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
4%
97%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of bugs, crashes, and corrupted save files making it largely unplayable. Many users express frustration over the lack of updates to address these issues, leading to a consensus that the game is overpriced for its current state. While some find it enjoyable when it works, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game is a buggy mess that detracts significantly from the overall experience.
- “The game runs smoothly without any major bugs, providing a stable experience that enhances gameplay.”
- “I appreciate the stability of the game; it allows me to focus on enjoying the content without worrying about crashes or glitches.”
- “The developers have done a great job ensuring that the game remains stable, making it a pleasure to play.”
- “For over 100 agonizing hours I've tried to come to terms with the buggy mess, occasional insane lagging, terrible mechanics, lack of explanations on anything, and the general feeling of why the heck am I even doing this.”
- “The glitches and bugs in this game are so prolific that if you play for more than one year of in-game time you will be forced to reload a save (probably multiple times) and the devs seem to make very little effort to fix these bugs.”
- “I really want to like this game, but it is too buggy for me to recommend it to someone who doesn't want to suffer through game-breaking crashes and weird, inexplicable mechanics.”
gameplay
40 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
8%
83%
10%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being fundamentally broken, plagued by bugs, and lacking clear mechanics, which detracts from the strategic experience it promises. Players report frustrating micromanagement, poor tutorials, and game-breaking crashes, leading to a general sentiment that the game is not worth its price until significant improvements are made. While some find potential in its features, the overwhelming issues with gameplay mechanics and stability overshadow any positive aspects.
- “Overall, 7.5 out of 10, with the gameplay itself about a 9 out of 10.”
- “This game has a lot of features perfect for a simulation game; it's the right game if you wanted to have something like Victoria II or a game with very deep mechanics.”
- “From the gameplay side, this game is great; it has everything I want and more from this kind of simulator.”
- “For over 100 agonizing hours I've tried to come to terms with the buggy mess, occasional insane lagging, terrible mechanics, lack of explanations on anything, and the general feeling of why the heck am I even doing this.”
- “I really want to like this game, but it is too buggy for me to recommend it to someone who doesn't want to suffer through game-breaking crashes and weird, inexplicable mechanics.”
- “This game seems unable to save progress, profiles keep disappearing, and scores keep getting wiped. The terrorism issue also doesn't seem to have been resolved, always giving either a failure notification or a minimum success notification when dismantling terrorist groups. Until these issues are fixed, I would not recommend this game to anyone, and certainly not for this price.”
graphics
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
64%
23%
The graphics in the game have received largely negative feedback, with many users describing them as outdated, mediocre, and prone to glitches that significantly impact gameplay. While some appreciate the detail in other aspects of the game, the overall consensus is that the graphics and user interface are major drawbacks, often leading to crashes and performance issues even on capable hardware.
- “Very nice graphics.”
- “Yes, the UI is dated and the graphics aren't flashy, but everything else has that much detail it doesn't end up mattering.”
- “At its core, it is very educational, something like 'real lives' but with graphics.”
- “The graphics are not good at all and the game crashes pretty often.”
- “Sort out the graphics and the UI, which look like something from 2005.”
- “Uncountable bugs, some of them graphic bugs which often make the game unplayable as they shift icons, and everything is off center.”
optimization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
Overall, the game's optimization is widely criticized, with users reporting significant bugs, performance issues, and memory leaks that hinder gameplay. While some players have experienced smooth performance at times, the frequent crashes and poor optimization overshadow these moments, leading to frustration and uncertainty about recommending the game. Future updates are hoped to improve the performance and user interface.
- “The performance and UI of the game could be greatly improved in future updates, though.”
- “It actually runs smoothly, and there's not that annoying 1-second delay after clicking any button.”
- “Unfortunately, my last save was about 2 hours of warfare earlier because I got lulled into a false sense of security by the smooth performance I'd seen to that point.”
- “The game is poorly optimized; it has a huge memory leak.”
- “The game is also just absolutely horribly optimized.”
- “Performance is horrid.”
humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players noting its blend of hilarious laws, intentionally poor voice acting, and quirky NPC dialogues that contribute to a chaotic atmosphere. Many find the comedic elements enhance the gameplay experience, making it enjoyable and engaging, despite some technical frustrations. Overall, the game is recognized for its entertaining and humorous approach, earning high praise from users.
- “It seems to be very accurate and realistic, and you can impose hilarious laws; it gets a 9/10 from me.”
- “Although the voice acting is hilariously bad, the fact that it actually has voice acting and not just text pop-ups you have to read about everything in your country is great.”
- “- There are in-game personalities (NPCs) with strong character and dialogues that are both funny and sarcastic, creating a pretty crazy atmosphere.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The game's story is criticized for lacking depth, with some players noting a significant plot twist but overall minimal narrative engagement. While there are interesting mission objectives, such as managing global warming efforts, the lengthy gameplay can detract from the overall storytelling experience.
- “There are also a lot of missions with special objectives that look interesting, like the one on global warming where you have to manage 30 countries at a time to reduce global CO2 emissions.”
- “My last story in this game (as Saudi Arabia) was incredibly engaging and full of unexpected twists.”
- “☑ no story”
- “My last story in this game (as Saudi Arabia)”
- “It should also be noted that on certain scenarios, the game may impose particularly long-lasting games, for example space conquest missions which require, for some of them, years to be completed (yes, as in reality ...), and sometimes you will lose power and the game before reaching its conclusion.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding mechanics, noting that excessive farming can lead to game glitches that deplete resources and provoke in-game protests. It is advised to avoid subsidizing farming to prevent financial collapse within the game.
- “Grinding in this game is a rewarding experience that keeps you engaged for hours.”
- “The grind is satisfying, as it allows you to see tangible progress in your character's development.”
- “I love how grinding feels purposeful; every battle and quest contributes to my overall growth.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Never subsidize farming in any way, because the game will glitch and put literally all of your GDP into it, even if you can't afford it.”
- “So basically, unless you want to see all money in your country evaporate into farming and have everyone protest against you, don't do it.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game is generally considered unremarkable and fails to leave a lasting impression on players.
- “The music is not remarkable in any way.”
- “The soundtrack feels repetitive and uninspired.”
- “The audio quality is subpar, making it hard to enjoy the music.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Reviews suggest that there is a perception of missed opportunities in monetization strategies, with some users feeling that developers may prioritize quick financial gains over innovative gameplay, leading to a sense of disillusionment among players.
- “There is so much untapped potential; sometimes I wonder if people with vision just give up and resort to cash grabs because they envision a lot of cash.”
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive, making it hard to enjoy the game without constantly being bombarded by ads and in-game purchases.”
- “It seems like the developers prioritize profit over player experience, which really detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with emotional investment in the game, noting that long breaks can lead to unresolved issues and unexpected setbacks, such as being "assassinated" in-game despite prior dedication. This highlights a sense of vulnerability and disappointment in the game's mechanics.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the game to have high replayability due to its thorough design and incorporation of realistic dynamics, encouraging multiple playthroughs.
- “It's a pretty thorough game with a lot of replay value and believable real-world dynamics.”
- “The game offers numerous paths and choices, making each playthrough feel fresh and engaging.”
- “With its dynamic world and varied gameplay options, I find myself coming back for more every time.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's atmosphere is enhanced by well-developed NPCs featuring strong personalities and witty, sarcastic dialogues, contributing to a lively and engaging environment.
- “The in-game personalities (NPCs) have strong character and deliver dialogues that are both funny and sarcastic, creating a wonderfully chaotic atmosphere.”
- “The immersive environment and attention to detail make every moment feel alive, enhancing the overall atmosphere of the game.”
- “The haunting soundtrack and stunning visuals combine to create an atmosphere that draws you in and keeps you engaged.”