Pixel Car

About Pixel Car

Pixel Car is a single player casual racing game. It was developed by azimuth team and was released on October 31, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Check your reaction by running two machines on the screen at once. Collect as many bonuses as possible, without bumping into the obstacles of any of the machines.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip Games Like Pixel Car

Looking for games like Pixel Car? Here are top casual racing recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Viking's drakkars, Cowboy Escape or iterform.

17%42reviews

Viking's drakkars

2018

Casual Racing

36%14reviews

Cowboy Escape

2018

Action

19%13reviews

iterform

2018

Platformer

80%36reviews

Ballway

2017

Action

24%24reviews

PIXEL DRIFT

2018

Casual Racing

0%1review

hOSHIs Elektronauts

2018

Casual Racing

16%23reviews

Planum

2018

Action

Starfighter Neon

2017

Arcade Shooter

5%31reviews

Tank Rush

2018

Action

53%64reviews

ORIX!

2018

Action

More games like Pixel Car

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

53%Audience ScoreBased on 30 reviews

graphics3 negative mentions

Simple and straightforward gameplay that can be enjoyable for a short time and offers a unique challenge controlling two cars simultaneously.
Local multiplayer mode adds fun competition for small parties or playing with kids by sharing controls.
Soundtrack/music is well-liked and fits the game atmosphere, being the most praised aspect.

Poor graphics with minimal effort, very basic and unappealing visuals, resembling early 90s Flash games.
Lack of tutorial, unclear controls, and confusing mechanics make the gameplay frustrating and hard to understand initially.
Game is very short with repetitive content, poor collision detection, no replayability, no online features, and achievements require minimal effort.

graphics
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 73% neutral mentions, 27% negative mentions
The graphics are widely criticized for being simplistic, low-quality, and lacking effort, resembling basic mobile or minimalist 2D art with no meaningful graphical enhancements available. Resolution settings only scale the visuals without improving their clarity. Overall, the visuals are considered lackluster and uninspired.
- “The graphics here are some of the worst, laziest attempts at video game art I've ever seen.”
- “It's clear the developer didn't even try to produce any real graphics for the game and just phoned it in.”
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic 2D art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38% positive mentions, 24% neutral mentions, 38% negative mentions
The music receives mixed feedback: while the soundtrack is praised for fitting the game well and enhancing the experience, it is criticized for being short, repetitive, and overly loud. Overall, the music is considered the game's strongest aspect despite its limited variety.
- “Love the music; it couldn't have fit the game better.”
- “Gameplay and graphics aren't really much to brag about, but the music really lifts the game.”
- “But a nice soundtrack anyways.”
- “It only has one repeating soundtrack, and you can’t customize car colors, but that doesn’t take away too much from the experience.”
- “Even though it has one soundtrack which repeats itself constantly and you can't choose the color of the cars.”
- “Then, an extremely loud MIDI arcade music will start and you'll get on the main game screen.”
gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43% positive mentions, 14% neutral mentions, 43% negative mentions
The gameplay is simple and straightforward, involving collecting circles and avoiding squares with basic controls, but managing two cars simultaneously makes it challenging and frustrating for some players. While the mechanics offer a fun concept, the strict penalties for missing circles or hitting barricades can detract from the enjoyment. Overall, the gameplay is functional but not particularly innovative or polished.
- “The gameplay is straightforward—collect circles, avoid squares, and move left or right using A and D.”
- “It's a fun and simple game with challenging mechanics.”
- “I mean, the concept and initial gameplay is alright until you realize you control both cars. It kinda sucks because you have to fumble around with two cars, and if you miss a single dot or hit a barricade, you lose. I thought the dots were for score, but they are vital to the game, which makes it unfun. It would be better if the results screen showed how many dots were missed to encourage you to do more.”
- “The game's hard because the gameplay is idiotic.”
- “The initial gameplay is alright until you realize you control both cars. It kinda sucks because you have to fumble around with two cars, and if you miss a single dot or hit a barricade, you lose. The dots are vital to the game rather than just for score, which makes it unfun.”
- “Gameplay and graphics aren't really much to brag about.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization is widely viewed as exploitative, with the game seen as a low-effort cash grab offering minimal gameplay value. Users criticize the lack of clear mechanics and feel the product was hastily developed solely to generate revenue.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game lacks replayability, offering no incentive or value for playing again once completed. Users note the absence of lives and replay features, resulting in little to no motivation to revisit the game.
- “No lives, no replay, and no replayability value, nothing else.”