Design your mobile headquarters, raise a fearsome army and wreak a path of destruction across the United States in 1-to-1 scale! Wage war to expand your territory through fast-paced, intense player-vs-player combat and upgrade your base with the enemy’s loot. Forge cooperative alliances and together expand the ever-growing borders of your new empire!
The game offers a fun and strategic gameplay experience, especially when joining alliances and coordinating attacks.
Many players find the combat mechanics engaging and enjoy the challenge of leveling up and upgrading their bases.
The graphics and audio are decent, providing a satisfactory experience for a free-to-play game.
The game suffers from long wait times for upgrades and actions, which can be frustrating for players.
There are significant issues with server stability and login problems, leading to a poor user experience.
Many reviews highlight the game's pay-to-win mechanics, making it difficult for free players to compete effectively.
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some users finding it boring and derivative, while others appreciate the battle mechanics as a highlight. It may appeal to newcomers to the genre, but experienced players might find it lacking in originality. Overall, the gameplay experience is described as average, with a few standout mechanics.
“If you are just getting into this kind of game, you may find this game enjoyable if you are inclined to this kind of gameplay.”
“The battle mechanics are the best part about the game.”
“These game mechanics are wonderful.”
“The gameplay is boring and shouldn't be on PC.”
“This is a clone of a lot of games.”
“I stopped at veteran base level 5 and that was over 45 minutes of gameplay.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
20%
40%
The graphics in the game are generally praised as very good, with some users noting a standard quality that aligns with current trends. However, there are mixed feelings about the artistic style, with some finding it appealing while others criticize it as overly edgy. Overall, the visuals are considered a strong point of the game.
“Very good and good graphics.”
“Excellent graphics”
“The graphics are pretty standard fare here.”
“The 'edgy' artwork seems aimed at hip youngsters, but I feel Path of War deserves most of the hate for its visuals.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The story revolves around a proto-confederate rebellion against a corrupt government, which some players found intriguing but ultimately felt underwhelmed due to the repetitive and dull nature of the missions. Overall, while the premise is unique, the execution leaves much to be desired.
“In fact, the story of the proto-confederate redneck rebellion trying to fight the evil DC government was something I simply had to see for myself to believe.”
“You upgrade your base, do a few missions and then move on.”
“The missions themselves are pretty boring as well.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
Users find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, often requiring significant effort to progress. Some players feel that it detracts from the overall enjoyment, suggesting that it may necessitate a second playthrough to fully engage with the content.
“Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
“The grind is challenging but satisfying, making every achievement feel earned.”
“You'll need a second life for grinding.”
“Tedious.”
“Grinding.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is praised for its stability, with users reporting no bugs, glitches, or the need for mods, indicating a smooth and reliable gaming experience.
“The game has no bugs, no glitches, and no mods.”
“I appreciate the stability of the game; it runs smoothly without any interruptions.”
“The performance is consistent, making for a seamless gaming experience.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Many users express frustration with the monetization model, questioning the value of paying for a game that includes microtransactions when affordable, complete alternatives are available on platforms like Steam.
“The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel exploitative, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
“I appreciate that the game offers cosmetic items for purchase, but they don't impact gameplay, making it a balanced experience.”
“The optional purchases enhance the game without being necessary, which is a refreshing approach to monetization.”
“What point is there in paying for a game like this when you can buy a full game for a few dollars on Steam, with no microtransactions?”
“The monetization model feels exploitative, as it constantly pushes players to spend more money to enjoy the game fully.”
“It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls, making it hard to enjoy the game without shelling out extra cash.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game has been criticized for being unoriginal, with claims that it borrows from "Dino Storms." While some players find the overall experience frustrating, the music does not seem to enhance the gameplay.
“The game is horrible and good for taking your frustrations out on it; it also stole Dino Storm's music.”
“The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
“I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the humor in the game's support interactions, particularly when a suggested fix involves deleting a non-existent file, highlighting the absurdity of the situation.
“I made a comment in the forum asking for a fix, and they offered a solution that involved deleting a file. The funny thing is, the file they said to delete doesn't even exist!”