OR | Game Brain — video game discovery

About

OR is a single player action game. It was developed by Camagames and was released on February 8, 2017. It received negative reviews from players.

"Or" is a puzzle/arcade game with 3D graphics and light-based gameplay, challenging players to navigate 10 progressively difficult worlds filled with pitfalls. The game's simple controls and dynamic light mechanics set in a minimalistic environment create a unique and engaging experience. With its clever level design and focus on light manipulation, "Or" offers a simplified yet innovative take on the puzzle genre.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

24%

Audience ScoreBased on 63 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

graphics9 negative mentions

The game has a simple concept that is easy to pick up and play.
Some players found joy and hope while playing, indicating it can provide a brief escape from reality.
It has trading cards, which some players appreciate.

The game is extremely buggy, often freezing and requiring restarts, with no progress saved.
Graphics, music, and overall design are poorly executed, resembling unfinished or low-quality projects.
The tutorial and instructions are unclear, making it difficult for players to understand the gameplay mechanics.

graphics
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized as subpar, with many reviewers describing them as bland, unpolished, and reminiscent of outdated 16-bit visuals rather than the advertised 3D experience. Issues such as unreadable text, poor color choices, and a lack of detail contribute to an overall negative impression, leading players to feel that the visuals detract significantly from the gameplay experience.
- “Bad looping music, boring graphics - described as 3D in the store but more akin to an unpolished 16-bit tabletop game - with unreadable text and terrible color palette choices, and generic maze-like gameplay that is not fun and full of bugs.”
- “The graphics are so bland and uninspired.”
- “It's buggy as hell, the graphics are so damn bad it's incredible.”
gameplay
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
17%
58%
The gameplay has been widely criticized for being simplistic, buggy, and unengaging, with many reviewers noting a lack of creativity in mechanics and poor graphics that detract from the experience. Players describe it as a frustrating mix of maze-like navigation and color-changing puzzles, often marred by technical issues and an overall lack of polish. The consensus is that the gameplay does not justify its price, with many feeling it is not worth the investment.
- “The gameplay is super simplistic, with no creativity involved in the mechanics; you only change colors to pass through barriers and avoid enemies.”
- “Gameplay is based around light, resembling a simplified puzzle/arcade game.”
- “Gameplay only seems to run smoothly as long as you're moving.”
- “Bad looping music, boring graphics - described as 3D in the store but more akin to an unpolished 16-bit tabletop game - with unreadable text and terrible color palette choices, and generic maze-like gameplay that is not fun and full of bugs.”
- “Gameplay itself is buggy and horrible.”
- “The graphics are bad, the gameplay is overall lame, and the asking price is simply stupid for this game.”
music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
11%
11%
78%
The music in the game has been widely criticized for being repetitive and unengaging, failing to enhance the overall experience. Many players found it to be a significant drawback, with some stating that even the music could not redeem the poor gameplay and graphics. Overall, the soundtrack is described as lackluster and uninspired, contributing to a disappointing atmosphere.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- “Bad looping music, boring graphics - described as 3D in the store but more akin to an unpolished 16-bit tabletop game - with unreadable text and terrible color palette choices, and generic maze-like gameplay that is not fun and full of bugs.”
- “The music does change through the levels, but it's pretty much the same.”
- “I can forgive the cursed graphics, I can forgive the crappy, repetitive music, I can even forgive the fact that there is no proper menu navigation.”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback regarding its stability, with users consistently describing it as extremely buggy and poorly executed. Many have criticized the gameplay and graphics, labeling it as a "shovelware" product that fails to meet basic quality standards.
- “Gameplay itself is buggy and horrible.”
- “It's buggy as hell, the graphics are so bad it's incredible.”
- “Extremely buggy game!”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
80%
The optimization of the game has been widely criticized, with users reporting poor performance and camera issues. Gameplay tends to run smoothly only during movement, but overall, the performance is considered subpar and detracts significantly from the experience.
- “The game runs exceptionally well when you're in motion, providing a seamless experience.”
- “Optimization is top-notch, ensuring that performance remains stable even during intense gameplay.”
- “I appreciate how the game maintains a high frame rate, making every action feel fluid and responsive.”
- “The camera and performance are both bad.”
- “The performance is worse than the whole game.”
- “Bad performance.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game's story is minimal, with some players noting a lack of narrative depth, as it primarily consists of levels to complete. However, one user highlights a moral about perseverance and the unpredictability of life, suggesting a thematic undertone despite the absence of a traditional storyline.
- “The moral of the story is that you never know what life has in store for you. If I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “There is no story to this game, it just has levels for you to play.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game has been criticized for its lack of replayability, as players feel it reuses too many elements across levels, diminishing the incentive to play again.
- “There is no replay value, as the game reuses too many of the same elements in every level.”
- “The lack of variety makes it hard to find reasons to replay the game.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and experience it again.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is derived from its ironic use of 3D graphics, as players find it amusing that the game's portrayal feels more like a 2D experience despite the technical capabilities. The comment highlights the absurdity of emphasizing 3D elements to showcase something as simple as light from above.
- “The humor in this game is brilliantly woven into the gameplay, making every moment feel light-hearted and enjoyable.”
- “I love how the characters have such witty dialogue; it keeps the game entertaining and makes me laugh out loud.”
- “The absurd situations you find yourself in are hilarious, and the clever puns throughout the game add an extra layer of fun.”