Operation: New Earth

About

Operation: New Earth is a sci-fi strategy game with good mechanics and impressive graphics, but it has some bugs that need fixing. Players must defend Earth from an alien invasion in thrilling multiplayer battles, deploying units and resources to secure victory. Despite its flaws, the game offers immersive and challenging gameplay that sci-fi strategy fans will enjoy.

Genres & Tags

Strategy

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,152 reviews

graphics18 positive mentions

stability13 negative mentions

The game has a supportive community with helpful alliance leaders and members.
Gameplay is engaging and easy to pick up, with a well-structured tutorial.
Customer service is responsive and effective in resolving issues.

The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free players to compete.
Progression can be extremely slow, with long wait times for upgrades and research.
There are significant balance issues, with high-level players bullying newcomers and low-level players.

graphics
35 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
51%
40%
9%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising their quality and attention to detail, while others criticize them for being subpar compared to similar titles. Many appreciate the engaging visual style, but there are frequent mentions of bugs and a lack of detail in certain areas, particularly when zooming in on buildings. Overall, while the graphics are generally considered good, there is a consensus that improvements could enhance the overall experience.
- “For a conceptual game, with simplistic graphics, I really like the attention to details.”
- “Graphics and everything about this game is very well made and it never shuts down or lags.”
- “Cool graphics, engaging tasks, and difficult strategy.”
- “Graphics are slightly better than 8-bit Nintendo.”
- “The graphics are much worse than other games; otherwise, it's a cool strategy game. It will take at least six years to complete the game.”
- “The game looks like it had a bug or something because the graphics are poor, and when you zoom closely to the building, it gets blurry.”
gameplay
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
47%
33%
20%
Gameplay is characterized by complex mechanics that may favor players with strong mathematical skills, potentially disadvantaging younger audiences. While many players appreciate the strategic elements and thematic depth, there are notable concerns about balance, pacing, and community engagement, with some expressing frustration over slow progression and technical glitches. Overall, the gameplay offers a mix of enjoyment and challenges, with room for improvement in terms of bugs and gameplay speed.
- “I enjoyed the game mechanics, especially the tactical map view of ground battles.”
- “It has an amazing theme, gameplay, and progression.”
- “Good gameplay... graphics not bad... much better advancement in gameplay, more choices.”
- “It has complex mechanics that give advantages to those who understand math, so younger players might not be able to play as effectively.”
- “This game has a lot of strategic downfalls where you can't defend or protect troops or overcrowd the medbay. It still has a lot of potential if the bugs were worked out for better gameplay since this is a 'defender' style game.”
- “Boring gameplay... the community in the game doesn't seem to have much drive to engage with it.”
stability
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game is a significant concern among users, with frequent reports of freezing, glitches, and disconnections that hinder gameplay. Many players have experienced issues such as slow startup times and bugs that lead to lost progress, with little to no response from support teams. While some users find the game enjoyable despite these problems, the overall consensus highlights a need for improved stability and better customer service.
- “I downloaded the game 2 days ago and since then it gets halfway through the loading screen and freezes.”
- “It's a shame that this game has so many glitches and you can lose everything and never recover because of a glitch. I really liked this game and have invested so much time, but it seems not to matter. I have never received a response when I reached out to admin about it.”
- “This game is so buggy, it won't stay connected for more than 5 minutes.”
monetization
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The monetization strategy of the game is heavily criticized, with users labeling it a "cash grab" due to ineffective in-game purchases and misleading advertisements. While ads are optional and can provide rewards, many players feel that the overall experience is marred by frequent ads and a lack of meaningful improvements over time. Despite some potential, the monetization approach has led to frustration and dissatisfaction among the player base.
- “In-game purchases are a disaster.”
- “Big cash grab.”
- “Well, 2 years on and nothing has improved; the game is just a cash grab now. Update after update, it just gets worse. There's no point in complaining to admin or devs; they just lie.”
story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
33%
33%
The game's storyline is generally considered good, but players feel it lacks depth and clarity, particularly regarding the alien invasion narrative. While the gameplay and missions are enjoyable and rewarding, many users express a desire for a more developed and intuitive story to enhance their overall experience.
- “Overall, the game has a good plot line but is not as intuitive as one would want.”
- “The most enjoyable game I've played since quitting War Commander, 5 years ago, when the gameplay and missions got really hard in an effort to make players buy more stuff.”
- “I just wish the developer did more to teach new players about the different aspects of the game and did more to develop the storyline of how aliens invaded Earth.”
- “I feel it'd be better if it had more of a story.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor aspect of the game is perceived as ironic and frustrating, with users finding the situation of account suspension and customer service interactions amusing yet absurd. One reviewer highlighted the comedic element in being accused of fraud despite not having played the game, suggesting a disconnect between player experience and game management. Overall, the humor seems to stem from the unexpected and often ridiculous circumstances surrounding player support and account issues.
- “It's so funny that after spending a lot of money on upgrading many buildings, my account got suspended within 11 days. When I contacted customer service, they asked for an ID card because I was accused of fraud. It's hilarious!”
- “It's kind of funny that I didn't even play this yet, but I just wanted to point out how amusing the situation is.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players report that grinding can be frustrating due to frequent overkill attacks from higher-level players using multiple fake profiles for spying and farming, making it difficult to progress without facing overwhelming challenges.
- “Level 17 commander's risk assessment: you will be inundated with overkill attacks by higher-level players using multiple fake profiles for spying and farming.”
- “The grinding in this game feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I spent hours grinding for resources, only to find that the rewards are minimal and not worth the effort.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game begins playing after a five-minute delay, creating a prolonged period of silence before the gameplay starts. This slow introduction may leave players feeling disconnected initially, as they wait for the audio to enhance their experience.
- “The game is black for a while, and then after 5 minutes, you start to hear music. One minute after that, the game actually starts.”
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it feel monotonous after a short time.”
- “The soundtrack doesn't match the game's atmosphere, which detracts from the overall experience.”