Last Shelter: Survival Game Cover

"Last Shelter: Survival" is a strategy game with a good plot and gameplay, impressive graphics, and frequent grinding. Fight off zombies and rebuild your shelter while dealing with bugs and annoying ads. The game's description: "The Zombies are coming, the last shelter is almost in ruins, rebuild and survive!"

  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Phone
  • Android
  • Mobile Platform
  • Tablet

Reviews

59%
Audience ScoreBased on 9,998 reviews
graphics339 positive mentions
monetization701 negative mentions
  • The game has great graphics and an engaging storyline.
  • Gameplay is fun and addictive, with plenty of activities to keep players busy.
  • The community aspect is strong, allowing players to connect and strategize with others.
  • The game is heavily pay-to-win, making it difficult for free players to compete.
  • Recent updates have introduced bugs and glitches that disrupt gameplay.
  • The game is often misleading in its advertisements, not reflecting the actual gameplay experience.
  • monetization860 mentions

    The monetization aspect of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many users criticizing the misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the gameplay. Players report a heavy reliance on in-app purchases, often feeling pressured to spend money to progress, which contributes to a "pay-to-win" environment. Additionally, the frequency and nature of the ads have been described as intrusive and deceptive, leading to frustration among users who feel misled by the promotional content.

    • “It's a cool game, but to get anywhere, you have to buy a ton of in-app purchases, which gets expensive fast.”
    • “Overall a great long journey... just be careful with those in-app purchases.”
    • “Although there's a lot of in-app purchases offered, you don't have to pay to still be able to play and develop your city.”
    • “Over the past 6 months or so, the devs have introduced a ton of new features that have not only created a lot of new bugs, they're also obvious cash grabs giving big spenders a huge advantage over everyone else.”
    • “The key reason that I have stopped playing and left a negative review, however, is due to the (perhaps not purposely) misleading descriptions of several in-app purchases.”
    • “The game is nothing like the advertisements portrayed as.”
  • graphics556 mentions

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their quality and detail, particularly for a mobile game. However, several users express disappointment over misleading advertisements that promise superior visuals not reflected in actual gameplay, leading to frustration. While some appreciate the artistic style and smooth animations, others criticize the graphics as outdated or lacking depth, suggesting that improvements are needed to enhance the overall experience.

    • “The graphics are amazing.”
    • “I love the game, the graphics are amazing and the way you play it is relaxing!!!”
    • “Great graphics and gameplay.”
    • “The graphics are shocking for a phone game.”
    • “The graphics look like something I drew when making up my own video games in the 4th grade.”
    • “This game is terrible, it reminds me of the Oregon Trail; the graphics are so terrible and they make the growth very large so you have to spend money.”
  • gameplay542 mentions

    Gameplay reviews for the game reveal a mixed bag of experiences. While many players find the gameplay addictive and enjoyable, they express frustration over misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the actual game mechanics, often leading to disappointment. Additionally, issues such as pay-to-win mechanics, unbalanced gameplay, and a steep learning curve for new players are frequently mentioned, suggesting that while the core gameplay may be engaging, it is marred by design flaws and monetization strategies that detract from the overall experience.

    • “The gameplay is good, but the game needs to be optimized; it seems buggy at times, also the upgrades are taking too much time which doesn't give a chance for newcomers who don't spend money.”
    • “Gameplay is fluid, even though I've seen multiple reviews on here about the game lagging.”
    • “Great addictive strategic gameplay with sufficiently amazing graphics!”
    • “The actual gameplay is so lame compared with the advertisement... I felt deceived.”
    • “The gameplay is nothing like what was shown in the ad, but is instead a rough copy of a million other grind and pay-to-play city builders that are out there.”
    • “The ads are lies and nothing like what the actual gameplay is.”
  • story244 mentions

    The game's story is generally described as engaging and well-developed, with many players appreciating the compelling narrative and character interactions. However, some reviews highlight issues with mission clarity and progression, often feeling repetitive or lacking depth as the game progresses. While the graphics and voice acting receive praise, there are complaints about the reliance on in-game purchases to advance the storyline effectively.

    • “The voice acting and storyline is very engaging!”
    • “Great graphics, story line, and it keeps it interesting along the path.”
    • “I love the storyline, great graphics, zombie strategy at its best.”
    • “It has lots of characters to recruit but no real storyline to affect the gameplay.”
    • “The story line is garbage and the dialog is laughable.”
    • “The game is extremely boring with absolutely no back story.”
  • stability233 mentions

    The game's stability is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent freezes, crashes, and glitches that disrupt gameplay. While some players have experienced minimal issues, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game is plagued by bugs, particularly after updates, leading to frustration and a lack of effective customer support from developers. Overall, players advise caution, especially regarding in-game purchases, due to the instability and potential for lost progress or resources.

    • “No annoying ads, and no glitches.”
    • “No glitches or crashes.”
    • “The controls are good and aren't buggy.”
    • “The game crashes so many times... there are so many glitches... do not invest money in it... they keep releasing new things to buy but the game is always unstable that you can't play.”
    • “The worst part is no guarantee when bugs hit you, but can and has been at worst possible times like when in battle and have a few seconds to act, screen freezes, I get hit, have no idea what's going on and multiple restarts may not fix it.”
    • “I have spent over €2000 on this game and there have been quite a few glitches, one of €25.99 for a package, never got a refund or compensation and other bits.”
  • grinding111 mentions

    The grinding aspect of the game is widely criticized for being excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest significant hours to progress or remain competitive. Many reviews highlight the frustration of being constantly attacked by higher-level players, making it difficult to enjoy the game without spending money. While some players appreciate the long-term commitment and farming mechanics, the overall sentiment leans towards the grind being a major drawback, especially for free-to-play users.

    • “Only bad things about the game are the matchmaking system, and the fact that to be any good at the game you have to buy their items or spend countless hours grinding out the little side quests to still be behind everyone else who paid for everything in their base.”
    • “Grinding the game does not unlock everything, even after 15 months.”
    • “The fact that other players can just randomly attack you constantly unless you join a clan, and leveling up is a tedious slog, makes this a rubbish game.”
  • optimization27 mentions

    The game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with some players experiencing performance issues such as slowdowns and bugs, particularly after extended play sessions or updates. While many users report smooth gameplay and enjoyable mechanics, concerns about navigation, long upgrade times, and potential security risks have been noted. Overall, there is a consensus that further optimization is needed to enhance the gaming experience, especially for new players and those using tablets.

    • “Runs smoothly, and doesn't take a lot of time to upgrade your base to a decent level.”
    • “Good game, some optimization could be done on the navigation between different systems but it's easy to account for because it teaches you along the way.”
    • “Great graphics, runs smoothly and it is fun to gradually build up your 'zombie city'.”
    • “Developers have introduced too many new add-on features to get players to spend money on the game while also negatively affecting performance.”
    • “Ok, I don't understand how you guys work to improve the game, but literally the performance of the game has worsened over the last several updates.”
    • “Gameplay is good, but the game needs to be optimized; it seems buggy at times, and the upgrades are taking too much time, which doesn't give a chance for newcomers who don't spend money.”
  • music18 mentions

    The music in the game receives mixed feedback from users; while some appreciate the engaging night-time tracks and sound effects, many express frustration over the inability to turn off the music, which often plays loudly even when the app fails to launch properly. Suggestions for improvement include adding a more dynamic soundtrack and enhancing the music experience during daytime gameplay. Overall, while the music is noted as enjoyable by some, technical issues and lack of control detract from the experience for many players.

    • “Very nice and fun to play, but it would be awesome if you added some super good music during the daytime too, similar to what plays at night. Engaging music keeps players thrilled, so make sure it's changed periodically like it does at night. Also, if it rains during the night, that would be super awesome!”
    • “Great music, voices, and sound.”
    • “I thought this was a different game, but after hearing the music, I realized that it wasn't. I like the improvements made so far; I just started playing again.”
    • “Half of the time that I've tried to open it, I get a black screen with background music.”
    • “Even though turning it off in the settings, it still keeps on playing the music and it's getting annoying.”
    • “Took over 5 minutes before I was even allowed to turn off the terrible music and sound effects.”
  • humor15 mentions

    The humor in the game is often described as unintentional and derived from its absurdities, such as misleading advertisements and poor dialogue. Players find amusement in the game's quirks, including its pay-to-win mechanics and the political censorship of chat, though some express frustration over these elements. Overall, while the humor can be hit-or-miss, it contributes to a lighthearted experience for many players.

    • “This is hilarious.”
    • “Game looks nothing at all like the ads (the disparity is hilarious).”
    • “So far the only comment I have is that the dialogue is hilariously bad.”
    • “It's not funny to the player who spent about $100 to lose a lot of diamonds for nothing.”
    • “The jokes fall flat and feel forced, making the game more frustrating than entertaining.”
    • “I expected humor to lighten the mood, but instead, it just added to the disappointment.”
  • emotional6 mentions

    The emotional aspect of the game is largely criticized, with users finding the story boring and poorly written, leading to a lack of engagement. While some players may find emotional connections through alliances and social interactions, many feel the gameplay does not support a meaningful emotional experience. Overall, the game appears to alienate those seeking a more compelling narrative or accessible gameplay.

    • “If you have nothing else to do but get emotionally involved in alliances and chat endlessly to try to hit on strangers, then this game is for you.”
    • “It started off with a boring story, and right after the first match, I uninstalled the app.”
    • “Just a really boring story and building stupid things.”
  • atmosphere4 mentions

    The game's atmosphere is mixed; while some players appreciate the cooperative environment fostered by alliances, others criticize the negative impact of top spenders and unmonitored freedom, which can lead to a less enjoyable experience. Overall, it offers a blend of camaraderie and challenges, appealing to those who enjoy building and zombie themes.

    • “Being part of an alliance has definitely helped, and has fostered an atmosphere of cooperation with players across the globe.”
    • “If you're looking for a game with a nice atmosphere, building, and zombies, then this game is for you.”
    • “The game system actually promotes freedom, but when it's not monitored, it turns into a bad atmosphere.”
    • “Being part of an alliance has definitely helped, but it has also fostered an atmosphere of cooperation that feels forced.”
  • replayability3 mentions

    Reviewers note that while the game has made improvements to enhance its replayability, it still suffers from certain limitations, such as a lack of a max level or restrictions on player attacks, which could further increase its playability and enjoyment.

    • “The game offers a variety of choices and paths, making each playthrough feel unique and engaging.”
    • “With multiple endings and character builds, I find myself coming back to explore different strategies.”
    • “The dynamic events and challenges keep the gameplay fresh, encouraging me to replay it often.”
    • “There are a few obvious problems that would really help the game be more replayable.”
    • “Other games have a maximum level or a limit on how many times you can be attacked by someone, which makes those games a little more replayable.”
  • character development2 mentions

    Reviews indicate a mixed sentiment regarding character development, with some disappointment over character design censorship. While the overall experience is still being evaluated, there is potential for meaningful development among certain survivor characters.

    • “Haven't played enough yet to really justify if it's good, but so far not bad. Decent graphics, and I believe there may be some good character development from certain survivors.”
    • “I'm pretty disappointed that character designs are getting censored.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative

Buy Last Shelter: Survival

Play time

7hMedian play time
9hAverage play time
2-17hSpent by most gamers
*Based on 5 analyzed playthroughs

Similar Games