NIMBY Rails

The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many users criticizing them as simplistic, bland, and uninteresting compared to other titles like Transport Fever 2. While some appreciate the minimalist design for its performance benefits, others feel it detracts from the overall experience, suggesting that improvements and customization options are needed. Despite these shortcomings, some players find the gameplay engaging enough to overlook the graphics, emphasizing the game's simulation aspects over its visual appeal.

The game's optimization has seen significant improvements since its release, allowing for the management of large transportation networks without major performance issues. However, players report that performance can still degrade with larger networks, particularly in intercity or intercountry scenarios, and some users have noted that the game is not fully optimized for multithreading. Overall, while the game runs smoothly on smaller scales and benefits from ongoing developer support, optimization remains a notable area for improvement.

The game lacks a traditional story or tutorial, requiring players to create their own goals and quests. Many reviews emphasize the absence of narrative content, with players primarily engaging in economic management and personal objectives rather than following a structured storyline. Overall, the consensus is that the game does not offer a compelling story experience.

The game's stability has seen significant improvement over the past year, with many users noting a reduction in crashes and major bugs, although some minor glitches and clunky features remain, particularly with track layout tools. While players have reported a generally smooth experience with no major memory leaks or graphics tearing, the game still exhibits some bugs typical of early access titles. Overall, the stability is considered acceptable, especially for an early access game, with many players finding it enjoyable despite its imperfections.

The game currently lacks any background music or sound effects, which many users feel detracts from the overall experience. While some players appreciate the absence of music to avoid annoyance during long play sessions, they express a strong desire for at least basic sound effects for interactions and a potential in-game soundtrack, suggesting genres like chillhop or soft jazz. Overall, the absence of audio elements is seen as a significant gap that could enhance gameplay and user engagement.

Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be largely tedious and time-consuming, particularly when constructing tracks and managing timetables. While the complexity of the system can be rewarding, many feel that the repetitive tasks required to build and optimize railroads detract from the overall enjoyment, often leading to the sentiment that extensive grinding is necessary. Despite these frustrations, some players appreciate the game's scale and potential for creativity.

Players find the humor in the game particularly enjoyable, highlighting the amusing station names generated from OpenStreetMap data, which can lead to unexpected and funny results. While some critique the economic balancing, the overall comedic elements contribute positively to the gaming experience.

The game offers high replayability, though players express a desire for improved tracking features to enhance their experience over time.

The emotional aspect of the game reflects a desire for greater flexibility and creativity in station design, with players expressing frustration over the current requirement for stations to be directly connected. Users are seeking features that would allow for more complex and visually appealing station layouts, enhancing their overall experience.

The game's atmosphere is significantly hindered by the absence of sound, which users feel is crucial for an immersive train simulation experience. The lack of auditory elements detracts from the overall ambiance, leaving players wanting more.