Neocolonialism

About

Neocolonialism is a single player and multiplayer economy turn-based strategy game with economy and business themes. It was developed by Esther Alter and was released on November 4, 2013. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Buy votes, make free trade agreements, manipulate the IMF, extract wealth, ruin everything. The map is upside-down.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

63%

Audience ScoreBased on 32 reviews

music2 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

Neocolonialism effectively uses game mechanics to critique modern capitalism, providing a unique and thought-provoking experience.
The game offers a lot of depth and strategic play, especially in multiplayer mode, making it enjoyable for those who appreciate social manipulation and bluffing.
The tutorials are concise and helpful, making the initially complex mechanics accessible to new players.

The AI is not very competent, which can detract from the single-player experience and make it feel less engaging.
The game can become repetitive after a few plays, lacking the depth needed for long-term enjoyment.
Technical issues such as poor graphics, limited resolution options, and a cumbersome turn progression can frustrate players.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The gameplay is noted for its unique mechanics that effectively enhance narrative elements, offering significant depth, especially in multiplayer settings where social interaction introduces layers of manipulation and bluffing. However, some players feel that while the mechanics are innovative, they do not necessarily translate to high-quality gameplay.
- “A very cool example of how to use game mechanics to make narrative points.”
- “There is a lot of depth to be discovered in these mechanics, and I imagine even more if playing with other people, since when you add in the social aspect, there is a whole new layer of manipulation and bluffing that can be done.”
- “The game mechanics are unique, but that doesn't contribute to quality gameplay.”
- “The game mechanics are unique, but that doesn't contribute to quality gameplay.”
- “The game mechanics are unique, but that doesn't contribute to quality gameplay.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The graphics have been criticized as plain and even horrible, but many users acknowledge that visual quality is not a primary focus for a turn-based strategy game. Overall, while the visuals may not impress, they are deemed secondary to the gameplay experience.
- “The graphics may be plain, but that's not what you're playing a strategy game like this for.”
- “It's a turn-based strategy game, and graphics are not the main focus.”
- “The only downside is the plain visuals, but that's not what you're playing a strategy game like this for.”
- “Graphics: horrible.”
- “I know it's a turn-based strategy game, and graphics are not important.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
25%
25%
The music in the game is praised for being excellent and effectively setting a great tone, although some users feel that it is overshadowed by a dull and limited interface, which detracts from the overall experience.
- “Music is excellent and sets a great tone.”
- “The dull and limited interface, along with the music and interactions, makes exploring the world feel boring.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is characterized as dark and appealing, particularly for fans of strategy games, making it a worthwhile investment for those who appreciate this style of comedy.
- “Definitely worth the modest investment for fans of strategy games and those with a pretty dark sense of humor.”