Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean

About

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean is a multiplayer role playing game. It was developed by SDEnterNet and was released on March 5, 2015. It received neutral reviews from players.

Navy Field 2 is the follow up to Navy Field, the original pioneer of Massively Multiplayer Strategic Online Naval Warfare. Cooperate with your team to maximize the potential of your vessel as you face off in large-scale naval battles. Challenge yourself to become the ultimate captain!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean screenshot

Skip User Reviews

41%

Audience ScoreBased on 705 reviews

gameplay21 positive mentions

graphics23 negative mentions

Dynamic naval combat with a variety of ship classes and tactics.
Engaging gameplay that rewards skill and teamwork.
Good graphics and improved mechanics compared to the original Navy Field.

Severe matchmaking issues, often pitting low-tier ships against high-tier ones.
Pay-to-win elements that can create an unfair advantage for paying players.
Frequent technical issues, including login problems and server instability.

graphics
95 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
22%
54%
24%
The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players noting that they are outdated and reminiscent of earlier titles, particularly Navy Field 1. While some appreciate the improvements made, others criticize the visuals as primitive or lacking detail, especially in battle scenes. Overall, graphics are not a primary concern for many players, who find the gameplay experience enjoyable despite the visual shortcomings.
- “The navy field graphics are a huge improvement over Navyfield 1 and get the job done.”
- “The graphics and other various details are also very neatly done and make for an aesthetically pleasing game.”
- “They improved the graphics, made the customization easier, and added some new functions.”
- “The graphics are not great either and the game itself runs rather badly.”
- “The gameplay is crap, the graphics are crap, don't get it and that's all I have to say about that.”
- “I played this for about 5 minutes, graphics are insanely bad, controls are also insanely bad, sound effects are terrible.”
gameplay
70 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
60%
10%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players enjoying its nostalgic mechanics and fun RPG elements, while others criticize its simplicity and lack of depth, likening it to a mobile game. Many users noted issues with matchmaking, controls, and a lack of player guidance, which detracted from the overall experience. Despite these criticisms, some players found the gameplay enjoyable and appreciated the variety offered by different ship classes.
- “The RPG elements are fun, and I love the seemingly simplicity of the gameplay.”
- “Awesome gameplay mechanics with easy-to-use controls; Navy Field 2 is a great naval battle game for those looking for quick action and World War II-style warfare.”
- “Different types of ships provide different gameplay, allowing you to add variety from one game to another or find your playstyle.”
- “The gameplay and features are really shallow that almost feel like a mobile game.”
- “The actual gameplay is slow, tedious, and boring.”
- “The fact that even the majority of the high tier ships rush in to die in seconds, no dodging or weaving, probably auto aim, possibly bots (no chat or common sense), and some just don't even shoot back makes this game's gameplay lame.”
grinding
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
6%
6%
88%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessive, often leading to frustration due to the perceived lack of rewards and the pay-to-win model that exacerbates the grind. While some acknowledge that grinding is expected in such games, many feel that the process becomes tedious, especially at higher tiers where progression slows significantly. Overall, the grind can detract from the enjoyment, although some still find the game engaging despite its grindy nature.
- “In-game income and prices are somehow proportional, and the level grind is not that grinding (most of the time).”
- “It is too much grinding for what feels like too little reward, with your win/loss being appalling.”
- “Pay to win is the only way to avoid years of grinding between any of the mid-high levels. There is no level balancing; tier 1 ships can and will be in tier 7 matches. Get used to it; there is nothing worse than being the only small ship in a big pond, and unless you're spending thousands of dollars, it won't change.”
- “Going through the research trees is a dull and grindy process, made worse by the linear upgrades instead of being able to actually change parts of your ships.”
story
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its lack of depth, with players noting that it primarily focuses on multiplayer combat rather than a narrative experience. While the setting is based in WWII, many reviewers feel that this historical context does not provide a compelling story, leading to a preference for more story-driven games. Overall, those seeking a rich narrative will likely be disappointed.
- “Very nice game but is only PvP. I would like to see missions in this game; if you like World of Tanks, you'll love this game!”
- “The only negatives I can think about are personal, and that is that I’m not very fond of multiplayer games where the objective is just to kill. I prefer story, which this game has none of (unless you say that the era this game was based in, WWII, was the story).”
- “This takes a lot of the fun out of the game as you wind up just playing missions to get to the next ship and not enjoying the game as one should.”
- “I prefer story, which this game has none of (unless you say that the era this game was based in, WWII, was the story).”
- “Most people today become involved in tutorials when they are actual playable missions with bots, and I think this game should include that.”
music
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
24%
38%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players finding it repetitive and overly loud, making it difficult to adjust without affecting other audio elements. While the soundtrack fits the gameplay well and enhances the experience for some, others describe it as forgettable and a hindrance to enjoyment, particularly due to the inability to control its volume independently. Overall, the music is seen as a notable aspect that could benefit from improvements in both variety and audio settings.
- “The audio, however, is good - especially the music which fits the gameplay very well.”
- “This game is perfect and very addicting; the only problem is you have to wait for the music to end before starting the round.”
- “Combat is entertaining while the music is a bit forgettable.”
- “The soundtrack is repetitive.”
- “Why is the background music so loud, and why can't I change it?”
- “You can tell how poorly this game was developed when you can't even turn the music down or off by itself, without turning off all of the other sounds.”
optimization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The game's optimization is mixed, with some players experiencing poor performance on lower-end PCs despite decent graphics settings. While players can earn credits and rewards based on their performance, the overall experience can be hindered by the game's reliance on morale and the unpredictability of battle outcomes.
- “Morale affects sailor performance and increases when battles are won, while it decreases slightly when battles are lost.”
- “Unlike other games, even if the round is lost, you still receive a decent reward based on your performance and damage.”
- “Bad performance on decent graphics settings on a low-end PC.”
- “Personal performance can only carry you so far, and some games are just unwinnable.”
- “Ships themselves, as well as some items to boost ship performance, can be bought with credits earned in battle.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a typical cash grab, featuring excessive microtransactions that detract from the overall experience. Reviewers express disappointment, feeling that the game falls into the category of low-effort free-to-play titles designed to exploit players financially.
- “It seems like it is following every other cash grab game's plan.”
- “There's just no excuse for having this type of monetization.”
- “I wanted to like this game, but developers should not be rewarded for lazy, shoddy cash grab games.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has been criticized due to persistent bugs and issues, particularly during the patching process, which often freezes. Additionally, users have reported difficulties accessing the game's website, hindering account creation and overall experience. Overall, these factors contribute to a less stable and frustrating user experience.
- “I downloaded the initial game fine, but the patch always freezes up at some point in the middle of file 7/16.”
- “I didn't even get to try this game because their website refuses to let me in. This problem confuses me, and due to the fact that every other website I try works, I can only believe that it's an issue with the website itself. I've been trying for the past couple of weeks now and sadly cannot make an account, so 2 stars from me for the buggy website. Good luck to others who wish to try this game.”
- “Cons: it's neither as fun nor playable as NF1 (which is still online, mind you), and it's still somewhat buggy.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with players finding it to be quite funny and entertaining. Overall, it adds a lighthearted and enjoyable element to the gameplay experience.
- “Woooooooooooow, what a funny game!”
- “It's kind of funny.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean
See offer on Steam

141h Median play time

667h Average play time

10-1600h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 5 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean

68%2.2kreviews

Steel Ocean

2015

Simulation

80%47kreviews

World of Warships

2015

Tactical Shooter

63%2.4kreviews

Armored Warfare

2017

Tactical Shooter

78%10kreviews

World of Warships

2015

Tactical Shooter

75%23.8kreviews

World of Tanks

2015

Arcade Shooter

More games like Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean is a role playing game.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean is available on PC and Windows.

On average players spend around 667 hours playing Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean was released on March 5, 2015.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean was developed by SDEnterNet.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its graphics.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean is a multiplayer game.

Similar games include Steel Ocean, World of Warships, Armored Warfare, World of Warships, World of Tanks and others.

Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean

Platforms

About

Buy Navy Field 2 : Conqueror of the Ocean