Might & Magic Chess Royale

About

Fight 1v100 in this new PVP 10-min autobattler! Strategy, skill & tactics to win

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

64%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,159 reviews

gameplay43 positive mentions

monetization10 negative mentions

The game has a unique concept of combining auto chess with battle royale mechanics, making it fast-paced and engaging.
Graphics and gameplay are well-designed, providing a visually appealing experience.
The game is free to play with no intrusive ads, allowing for a more enjoyable gaming experience.

The game frequently crashes, especially during matches, leading to frustrating experiences for players.
There is no way to sync accounts across devices, resulting in lost progress when changing phones.
The game lacks a proper tutorial, leaving new players confused about mechanics and strategies.

gameplay
101 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
45%
13%
The gameplay is generally praised for its smooth mechanics and engaging, fast-paced action, particularly in the context of a 100-player auto battler format. However, many players express concerns about balance issues, lack of tutorials, and the presence of pay-to-win mechanics, which detract from the overall experience. While the graphics and unique features like spell mechanics are appreciated, several users note that the game suffers from bugs and connectivity problems that hinder enjoyment.
- “The gameplay and the mechanics are really interesting, fun, and cool with the synergies and the economy of the game.”
- “Great graphics, fast gameplay, synergy systems are amazing.”
- “Fun twist on the auto-chess mechanics, by adding a battle royale aspect to it.”
- “The gameplay is confusing, with no tutorial or explanations of mechanics, leaving players completely unfamiliar with the rules.”
- “The game mechanics are extremely poor, and the gameplay is just pure luck; it feels like a slot machine with nothing to offer.”
- “Super slow, laggy, and clunky mechanics make this game boring and unenjoyable.”
graphics
97 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
53%
35%
12%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the art style and visual quality, describing them as "great" and "beautiful." However, several users criticize the graphics for being outdated, poorly optimized, or reminiscent of older mobile games, leading to issues like low frame rates and difficulty in recognizing characters. Overall, while the graphics are appreciated by some, there is a clear call for improvements and updates to meet modern standards.
- “Visuals and sound design are very satisfying.”
- “Graphics are excellent, gameplay is smooth and easy to pick up.”
- “Great game, incredible graphics and a lot of depth for a mobile game, I'm very surprised it's free.”
- “Graphically, the game is a mess with profile pictures that look like they were made in 2012 and models that are barely above par for a mobile game.”
- “Apart from the mediocre graphics, the frame rate is unacceptably low.”
- “Bad graphics just compared to other games of the same category; improve graphics, don't make them cartoonish like other games.”
monetization
34 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
26%
44%
29%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the absence of ads and microtransactions, which enhances the overall experience. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for future cash grabs and the randomness of in-app purchases, leading to a desire for more value in these transactions. Overall, while the current monetization model is praised for being player-friendly, there is caution regarding possible future changes that could shift towards a pay-to-win structure.
- “Truly free-to-play and no ads; they have nailed it.”
- “Currently, there are 0 microtransactions.”
- “No ads, no pay-to-win, and some really cool strategy/gameplay and graphics to mess around with!”
- “Strategy is not the key to win; in-app purchases and the level of heroes are the way.”
- “There is nothing to it anymore, just another one in a long list of cash-grabbing games.”
- “Destroyed a great skill-based game and turned it into just another cash grab.”
stability
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The stability of the game has been widely criticized, with numerous users reporting frequent freezes and crashes, particularly during matches. Many players experience significant lag and bugs, especially when attempting to load the game on various devices, leading to frustration and interruptions in gameplay. While some users note improvements after updates, the overall consensus is that the game remains unstable and requires further fixes to enhance the user experience.
- “The screen freezes and I have waited, and it doesn't work.”
- “I've played 5 matches so far and every single match I got to the top 50 and the game crashes/freezes.”
- “At first, the game was great, now it just freezes and I can't finish any matches.”
optimization
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
53%
20%
Overall, the game's optimization has received significant criticism, with users reporting outdated graphics, low framerates, and performance issues on various devices, particularly low-end ones. Many players feel that the game lacks essential features and polish, making it feel incomplete or like a demo. While some appreciate the mobile gaming experience, the consensus is that substantial optimization is needed to enhance gameplay and stability.
- “Hopefully that can be optimized so a wide range of devices can enjoy.”
- “Really fun short and sweet games, clearly optimized for a mobile gaming experience.”
- “A few minus points for the lack of optimization in the graphics as they feel outdated and are running at a low framerate.”
- “Great game with potential, but as of right now, it feels a little bit like it's in the early stages and needs a lot of optimization.”
- “The game is not optimized yet, lagging on low-end devices.”
story
13 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
54%
23%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its lack of engaging content and repetitive quests that force players into specific strategies, leading to frustration and a sense of stagnation. Many users express a desire for more diverse missions, character development, and a richer narrative experience, as the current quest system feels tedious and overly reliant on pay-to-win mechanics. Overall, players are seeking a more dynamic and rewarding storytelling approach that enhances gameplay rather than detracts from it.
- “I suggest adding more content such as having quests and such.”
- “Please new update for clan/guild, battle pass, story mode, commander, title, frame profile and many more thanks for feedback I give 5 stars again.”
- “I really hope the game will expand, new maps, more characters, maybe even a story.”
- “The quests update has made already small rewards even more expensive and harder to get with no positive tradeoff; it doesn't even add challenge, just a lot more time and/or money.”
- “Uninstalled after playing a few games at the latest update... the quest is not easier and also more boring. Why did you force players to use the same heroes over and over again just to finish the quest?”
- “P2W... 100% forces you into one build to level your 1-3 heroes. I want to use different synergies, but I can't afford it, so I lose interest; it gets repetitive.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
80%
60%
Reviews indicate that the humor in the game is inconsistent, with some players finding it lacking or poorly executed, particularly in the context of autochess mechanics. While a few users mention enjoying the game with friends, the overall sentiment suggests that the humor does not resonate well with the majority, leaving them feeling bored rather than entertained.
- “Funny, but I need to play with my friend.”
- “So funny and challenging!”
- “It's not funny; it feels like playing a boring 90's game.”
- “The humor falls flat and feels outdated.”
- “I expected more laughs, but the jokes just didn't land.”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
Reviews indicate that the game has shifted towards a farming mechanic, leading to a tedious grinding experience that detracts from its original fun. Players express frustration over the lack of account recovery, which compounds the grind by forcing them to restart after switching devices. Overall, the game is perceived as excessively grindy and leaning towards a pay-to-win model, diminishing the enjoyment of strategic play.
- “This is now a farming game with what made it fun thrown out for... not even sure what they replaced it with.”
- “It's basically farming heroes, and the worst part is the lack of account recovery. So once you buy a new phone, you are back at the beginning.”
- “Grindy and pay to win.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The music in the game is frequently praised for its quality and potential, with some users highlighting it as a standout feature. However, there are mixed feelings about its presence, with one reviewer expressing a desire for more music from composer Paul Romero. Overall, while the music is appreciated, it seems to be overshadowed by other gameplay issues.
- “I give this game 2 stars because it has a great concept, a lot of potential, really good graphics, and amazing music.”
- “Music is annoying; the tutorial is non-existent, gameplay is confusing, and I have no clue what I am doing most of the time, but it's somehow fun to play.”
- “Just as the game loading finishes, it goes to a solid pink screen with background music.”
- “I would love to give it five stars if there were more Paul Romero music in the game.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it enjoyable and highly replayable, others feel it lacks depth and variety for long-term engagement. There is a desire for improvements and a more substantial experience to enhance replay value.
- “Very replayable and enjoyable.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users express disappointment in the emotional depth of the game, feeling that a lack of sincerity detracted from their experience and led to a lower rating.
character development
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Character development is noted for its variety of synergies and distinct designs, contributing to a fast-paced experience; however, the integration of the battle royale element is seen as poorly executed, detracting from the overall depth of character growth.
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks meaningful progression, making it hard to connect with the characters.”
- “While the game offers a variety of character designs, the depth of their development is disappointingly minimal.”
- “The potential for character growth is overshadowed by repetitive gameplay and a lack of engaging storylines.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game successfully captures a powerful and enchanting atmosphere, immersing players in a world filled with might and magic.
- “It delivers the might and magic atmosphere perfectly.”
- “The game immerses you in a hauntingly beautiful world that feels alive.”
- “Every corner of the environment is filled with detail, creating an enchanting atmosphere.”