Middle East Empire

About

Middle East Empire is a single player casual strategy game. It received very positive reviews from players.

Middle East Empire is a single-player strategy game where you lead nations through epic warfare, employing strategy, diplomacy, and conquest. The gameplay challenges you to balance military tactics with political maneuvering to dominate the region. It offers an immersive experience that takes about 15 hours to complete.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

90%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,340 reviews

graphics5 positive mentions

monetization5 negative mentions

The game is an excellent turn-based political simulator that captures the essence of strategic gameplay, making it enjoyable for both casual and dedicated players.
It offers a unique and challenging experience, allowing players to engage in complex political and military strategies without being overly complicated.
The developers are responsive to feedback and continuously work on updates, which enhances the overall gaming experience.

The game suffers from bugs and glitches, particularly during warfare, which can lead to frustrating gameplay experiences.
Many players feel that the user interface is not intuitive, making navigation and understanding game mechanics challenging.
There are concerns about the balance of power in the game, as players often find that they can be easily defeated despite having superior resources and technology.

graphics
37 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
78%
8%
Overall, players express significant dissatisfaction with the game's graphics, describing them as lacking, unappealing, and in need of improvement. Many reviewers suggest that enhancing the visual elements and map design could greatly elevate the gaming experience, while some note that despite the addictive gameplay, the current graphics detract from overall enjoyment. A consensus emerges that while the game has potential, substantial graphical upgrades are essential for a more engaging and immersive experience.
- “The update made the game so much better; it now runs smoothly and the graphics improved. The only reason why I didn't rate it 5 stars is because the war room is kinda boring, but other than that, the game is fantastic.”
- “Great strategic war game, just needs more visual graphics.”
- “I hope the graphics can be more realistic.”
- “It's not very aesthetically pleasing, and the layout is not organized or neat.”
- “I think this game is awesome but the graphics aren't that good.”
- “The idea is very interesting but graphics are not good at all.”
gameplay
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
37%
19%
Overall, the gameplay is praised for its strategic depth and engaging mechanics, with many players enjoying the combat and diplomacy elements. However, there are significant criticisms regarding the lack of visual appeal, repetitive elements after extended play, and the absence of features like alliances. Players also express a desire for improvements in graphics and additional content to enhance the overall experience.
- “Great gameplay... but need more... adding some animation will be good... we expect more from you...”
- “The gameplay is fantastic and the strategies behind combat and diplomacy are quite easy to learn, seeing as I conquered all the way up to Turkey as Israel.”
- “The gameplay is great, just improve the graphics a bit.”
- “Makes no sense and no instructions, no visuals, boring and dumb gameplay, not impressed, not even a little bit, not worth the download wait time.”
- “The game just becomes repetitive with no real depth after a dozen hours of gameplay.”
- “Interesting but lacks gameplay.”
monetization
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the monetization model, citing excessive ads and a lack of in-game currency to purchase items. Many suggest that allowing free-to-play users to earn more tokens through watching ads would enhance the experience, indicating a desire for more opportunities to engage with the monetization system positively. Overall, while the game is well-received, improvements in monetization could significantly enhance player satisfaction.
- “Too long loading screens for such a simple game... too many ads and too little economy to buy anything in the game.”
- “However, I think the developers should allow us free-to-play players to watch ads and earn more tokens, and can decrease each ad for 10 tokens.”
- “I would prefer watching 20 ads with 10 tokens each ad, as it's easier to buy new things.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game's humor to be a pleasant surprise, particularly during challenging moments, as tutorials inject a lighthearted tone that enhances the overall experience.
- “The game was challenging, but just when I watched the tutorial, it turned into a funny experience that kept me engaged.”
- “The humor in this game is spot on, making even the toughest moments enjoyable.”
- “I found myself laughing out loud at the witty dialogue and hilarious situations throughout the game.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews suggest enhancing the game's story by incorporating more diverse scenarios, such as international troop deployments and espionage missions, including sabotage and hacking. Players express a desire for greater control over military units in battles and the addition of modern technology like drones to enrich the narrative experience.
- “The story lacks depth and fails to engage the player, making it feel more like a series of disconnected events rather than a cohesive narrative.”
- “The character development is minimal, leaving players with little emotional investment in the outcomes of the story.”
- “The plot twists are predictable and fail to surprise, resulting in a story that feels stale and uninspired.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
Users express a desire for more consistent music throughout the game, noting that they would prefer it to play continuously without silence. While the option to turn off the music is appreciated, many feel that the soundtrack could enhance the overall experience if it were more prominent.
- “The soundtrack really enhances the overall experience of the game.”
- “The music perfectly complements the gameplay, making every moment feel more immersive.”
- “I wish the music was always on (no silence); you can turn off the music if you wish.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's replayability is hindered by the necessity to purchase additional features, which detracts from its overall value. However, players appreciate its entertainment value and express a desire for more diverse playable countries to enhance the experience.
- “Replayability, entertainment value, this game has it all.”
- “It's a decent game, but the fact that all features that add replayability and depth have to be bought kills it.”
- “I personally love the game, but I think you should add more countries that you can buy weapons from (Japan, Germany, France, etc.). I understand that it is called Middle East Empire, but maybe you could add more playable countries, like some African countries such as Libya, Algeria, and Tunisia.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be slow and tedious, often leading to frustration, especially in the absence of advanced features that could alleviate the monotony.
- “It's also slow and grindy, and without the advanced features, gameplay can become very frustrating.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I find the repetitive nature of grinding to be a major turn-off; it detracts from the overall experience.”
stability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is criticized for being highly buggy, leading to a frustrating experience. Players report illogical mechanics, such as the inability to attack neighboring countries until certain conditions are met, which detracts from overall gameplay.
- “Buggy, illogical, and overall a bad experience.”
- “It is too buggy: for example, you cannot attack with troops a country that doesn't have borders with you now (but borders appear after some conquests).”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The recent update significantly improved the game's optimization, resulting in smoother performance and enhanced graphics. However, some players find the war room feature lacking in engagement, which affects their overall rating.
- “The update made the game so much better; it now runs smoothly and the graphics improved. The only reason I didn't rate it 5 stars is because the war room is kind of boring (all you do is either send jets or some warheads, that's pretty much it, plus the 'borders option'). Other than that, the game is fantastic.”

Skip Game Offers

Buy Middle East Empire

Middle East Empire
See offer on Play Store

15h Median play time

15h Average play time

15-15h Spent by most gamers

*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs

Skip Games Like Middle East Empire

81%820reviews

Asia Empire

Action

78%2.5kreviews

World Empire

Action

78%940reviews

Europe Empire

Action

78%741reviews

The President: 20th Century 1

Strategy

77%5.4kreviews

MA 1 – President Simulator

Casual Management

More games like Middle East Empire

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Middle East Empire is a casual strategy game.

Middle East Empire is available on Phone and Tablet.

On average players spend around 15 hours playing Middle East Empire.

Middle East Empire was developed by iGindis Games.

Middle East Empire has received very positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Middle East Empire is a single player game.

Similar games include Asia Empire, World Empire, Europe Empire, The President: 20th Century 1, MA 1 – President Simulator and others.

Middle East Empire

Platforms

About

Buy Middle East Empire