Metro Warp
- August 5, 2015
- Another Yeti
- 6h median play time
Get on SteamMetro Warp is a 3D puzzle game about guiding oblivious pedestrians who can only turn left. Place obstacles in front of these predictable commuters, and help them find the exits in 50 mind-melting floating worlds, where up is down and down is sideways.
Mac OS
PC
Windows
Linux
Reviews
- Challenging and rewarding puzzles that escalate in difficulty, providing a satisfying experience.
- Unique gameplay mechanics that offer a fresh take on the puzzle genre.
- Good art style and graphics, making the game visually appealing.
- Clunky interface and lack of tutorials make it difficult to get into the game.
- Some players find the game repetitive and feel it lacks replay value.
- The price is considered high for the amount of content offered, leading to feelings of being ripped off.
- music4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players find it catchy and enjoyable, prompting them to nod along while playing, others describe it as bland and even choose to mute it. Overall, it appears to be a notable aspect for some, but not universally appreciated.
“Music is pretty catchy because I always find myself nodding along while playing.”
“The music is bland; I ended up muting it.”
“The music is a big plus too.”
- gameplay3 mentions
- 67 % positive mentions
- -33 % neutral mentions
- 67 % negative mentions
Gameplay reviews highlight a frustration with the lack of basic instructions and concepts in some games, suggesting a need for better developer support. However, there is also appreciation for games that continuously introduce new mechanics, enhancing player understanding and engagement. Some players initially perceive the gameplay as a simple 2D adaptation in a 3D environment.
“+constantly introduces new mechanics to evolve your understanding of the game”
“At first, I thought it was just 2D gameplay adapted in 3D.”
“Let's support more developers who are too lazy to put even basic instructions or gameplay concepts into their games!”
“At first, I thought it was just 2D gameplay adapted to 3D.”
- graphics3 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are highly praised, particularly for a puzzle genre, showcasing an impressive art style that stands out in screenshots and during gameplay on full settings.
“On full graphical settings, it looks pretty good, certainly for a puzzle game.”
“I immediately noted the game's awesome art style from the images/screenshots.”
“Great art style.”
- optimization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Users highlight that the game features effective resource usage optimization, ensuring smooth performance and efficient management of system resources.
“The resource usage optimization in this game is impressive!”
“I love how the game focuses on optimizing resource management!”
“The optimization of resources really enhances the gameplay experience!”
“The game's resource usage optimization is severely lacking.”
“There are significant issues with how the game optimizes its performance.”
“The optimization of system resources is poorly implemented, leading to frustrating gameplay.”
- story1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The storyline received a low rating of 1 out of 5, indicating that users found it lacking in quality and engagement.
“The storyline is incredibly weak and fails to engage the player.”
“I found the plot to be predictable and lacking in depth.”
“The character development is almost non-existent, making it hard to care about the story.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Many users find the game's replayability lacking, suggesting that it may not justify its full price, and recommend purchasing it at a discount instead.
“I feel the game isn't particularly replayable; I have to admit that the base price is a little steep. I certainly don't feel ripped off, but I would definitely recommend purchasing the game at a discount.”
“After completing the game, I found little incentive to play it again. The lack of varied outcomes or new content makes it hard to justify a replay.”
“While the game was enjoyable, I don't see myself returning to it. The limited choices and predictable outcomes diminish its replay value.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -500 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Overall, the monetization strategy is viewed positively, as players appreciate the absence of excessive microtransactions in the game.
“But hey, at least it's not laden with microtransactions!”
“The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel exploitative.”
“I appreciate that the game offers plenty of content without pushing for additional purchases.”
“The game is enjoyable, but the monetization system feels overly aggressive.”
“I appreciate the gameplay, but the constant push for in-game purchases is frustrating.”
“While the game has potential, the monetization tactics detract from the overall experience.”
