Metro Warp

About

Metro Warp is a single player casual puzzle game. It was developed by Another Yeti and was released on August 5, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Metro Warp is a 3D puzzle game about guiding oblivious pedestrians who can only turn left. Place obstacles in front of these predictable commuters, and help them find the exits in 50 mind-melting floating worlds, where up is down and down is sideways.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 22 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

music2 negative mentions

The game features fun and challenging puzzles that escalate in difficulty, providing a rewarding experience.
It has a unique concept that introduces new mechanics, making it stand out in the puzzle genre.
The art style and graphics are appealing, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the game.

The interface is clunky and lacks proper tutorials, making it difficult for players to get into the game.
Some players find the game repetitive and feel that it doesn't offer enough content for its price.
There are issues with performance and optimization, particularly when using Steam Link.

music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews; while some players find it catchy and enjoyable, prompting them to nod along while playing, others describe it as bland and unremarkable, leading them to mute it. Overall, it appears to be a divisive aspect of the game.
- “Music is pretty catchy because I always find myself nodding along while playing.”
- “The music is bland; I ended up muting it.”
- “The music is a big plus too.”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
67%
Gameplay reviews highlight a frustration with the lack of basic instructions and concepts in some games, suggesting a need for better developer support. However, there is also appreciation for games that continuously introduce new mechanics, enhancing player understanding and engagement. Some players initially perceive the gameplay as a simple 2D adaptation in a 3D environment.
- “+ constantly introduces new mechanics to evolve your understanding of the game”
- “At first, I thought it was just 2D gameplay adapted in 3D.”
- “Let's support more developers who are too lazy to put even basic instructions or gameplay concepts into their games!”
- “At first, I thought it was just 2D gameplay adapted to 3D.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The graphics of the game are highly praised for their impressive quality, especially at full settings, and are complemented by a distinctive and appealing art style that stands out in the puzzle genre.
- “On full graphical settings, it looks pretty good, certainly for a puzzle game.”
- “I immediately noted the game's awesome art style from the images/screenshots.”
- “Great art style.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Users highlight that the game features effective resource usage optimization, ensuring smooth performance and efficient management of system resources.
- “The resource usage optimization in this game is impressive!”
- “I love how the game optimizes resource management for a smoother experience.”
- “The optimization of resources really enhances gameplay and keeps things running efficiently.”
- “The game's resource usage optimization is severely lacking.”
- “I found the optimization to be quite poor, leading to frequent performance issues.”
- “The lack of proper optimization makes the game feel sluggish and unresponsive.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The storyline received a low rating of 1 out of 5, indicating that users found it lacking in depth and engagement. Overall, the narrative appears to be a significant drawback for players.
- “The storyline is incredibly weak and fails to engage the player.”
- “I found the plot to be predictable and lacking in depth.”
- “The characters are one-dimensional and their motivations are unclear.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Many users find the game's replayability lacking, suggesting that it may not justify its full price, and recommend purchasing it at a discount instead.
- “Since I feel the game isn't particularly replayable, I have to admit that the base price is a little steep. I certainly don't feel ripped off, but I would definitely recommend purchasing the game at a reduced price.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices and consequences makes replaying the game feel pointless.”
- “After completing the game once, I found little incentive to go through it again; the experience felt too linear.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Overall, players appreciate that the game avoids excessive microtransactions, suggesting a more favorable monetization approach compared to other titles.
- “But hey, at least it's not laden with microtransactions!”
- “The monetization model is fair and doesn't feel exploitative.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers plenty of content without pushing for additional purchases.”
- “The game is enjoyable, but the monetization system feels overly aggressive.”
- “I appreciate the gameplay, but the constant push for in-game purchases is frustrating.”
- “While the game has potential, the monetization tactics detract from the overall experience.”