Memoir '44 Online

About

Memoir '44 Online is a multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by Days of Wonder and was released on October 12, 2011. It received neutral reviews from players.

Days of Wonder’s best-selling World War II board game is now available as a turn-based multiplayer online game on Steam!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Multi-Player

Skip User Reviews

59%

Audience ScoreBased on 392 reviews

gameplay7 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Great adaptation of the board game, capturing the tactical depth and historical scenarios.
Fast-paced gameplay that is easy to learn, making it accessible for both new and experienced players.
Fun to play against others online, providing a good way to enjoy the game without the setup of the physical version.

The pay-to-play model is frustrating, requiring players to purchase in-game currency to continue playing after a limited number of free games.
The AI can feel unbalanced, often benefiting from favorable dice rolls that can detract from the strategic experience.
Limited variety in scenarios and maps, which can lead to repetitive gameplay once the free options are exhausted.

gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
50%
15%
The gameplay is characterized by fast, accessible tactical mechanics that offer surprising depth and strategic choices, making it enjoyable for both new and experienced players. However, some mechanics can be unclear, particularly in edge cases, and the pay-to-play model has drawn criticism despite the overall fun and engaging experience. The game successfully captures the essence of traditional war games while maintaining a streamlined approach, making it easy to learn and quick to play.
- “⚔️ Fast, accessible tactical gameplay with surprising depth.”
- “ Simple mechanics, deep strategic choices in unit movement and command management.”
- “Gameplay is quick, reasonably fun, and free of rule arguing.”
- “The mechanics, while solid at their core, could be presented more clearly — especially for new players seeking tactical precision.”
- “In an effort to make a streamlined war game (noble, because many are inaccessible beasts!) they've stripped out many intuitive mechanics of war games.”
- “Shame about the pay to play mechanic once you run out of complimentary tokens.”
monetization
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The monetization in the game has received significant criticism, with users labeling it as a cash grab and expressing frustration over hidden in-app purchases that are not clearly disclosed. While the game's implementation is praised, the overall monetization strategy is viewed as exploitative and detrimental to the player experience.
- “It's a great game and the implementation is good, but the monetization is just awful.”
- “Not listed as having in-app purchases, though it very much does have them; please consider adding this to the Steam store page.”
- “In-app purchases.”
- “Not listed as having in-app purchases though it very much does have them; please consider adding this to the Steam store page.”
- “It's a great game and implementation is good, but the monetization is just awful.”
- “This game is such a cash grab.”
graphics
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
43%
43%
The graphics of the game are widely criticized for being outdated and unappealing, with many users calling for a significant overhaul of both the interface and in-game visuals. Despite these aesthetic shortcomings, some players believe the gameplay experience is strong enough to compensate for the lackluster graphics.
- “The visuals may put some people off (it's hexey, same as the boxed real-life version) but behind that it's a gem.”
- “Unfortunately, the money you'd need to keep playing this 'free to play' game in any meaningful way is not worth the dated graphics, repetitive music, and an interface that lacks a simple cancel button.”
- “It isn't much to look at; it needs a serious graphics overhaul in both the interface and in-game.”
- “There's no way I'm going to pay to continue playing something aesthetically unappealing and buggy.”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
40%
40%
The game's story is conveyed through dynamic battles that highlight pivotal moments, such as strategic maneuvers and critical mistakes that can influence outcomes. However, players express frustration with the limited scenarios available and the necessity of in-game purchases, suggesting that the board game version offers a more satisfying experience.
- “Each battle tells a story — a charge across a river, a desperate stand against a breakthrough — where a single lucky maneuver or disastrous blunder can turn the tide.”
- “Have to use gold just to play a game and very few scenarios to choose from, only 4-5, and there are no clear rules on each mission. (The board game is 100 times better.)”
- “First 2 missions are free, so give it a try, and if you like it, go for the board game; it comes out cheaper than purchasing in-game coins.”
stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is widely criticized for its poor stability, being described as a "buggy mess" with numerous issues and a lack of updates over the years. Users express frustration over the game's aesthetic shortcomings and the expectation to pay for a subpar experience.
- “It is a buggy mess that hasn't been updated for years, as far as I can tell.”
- “Very buggy game, which wants money to play on almost any map.”
- “There's no way I'm going to pay to continue playing something aesthetically unappealing and buggy.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
33%
The game's music is highlighted as an amazing soundtrack that complements the various nations, enhancing the overall experience. However, some players find the music to be repetitive, which detracts from the enjoyment over time.
- “The amazing soundtrack for each of the nations truly enhances the gameplay experience.”
- “The music in the game perfectly complements the atmosphere and immerses you in the historical context.”
- “The diverse range of musical themes adds depth and excitement to each battle.”
- “Unfortunately, the money you'd need to keep playing this 'free to play' game in any meaningful way is not worth the dated graphics, repetitive music, and an interface that lacks a simple cancel button.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Players note that while certain scenarios may be unbalanced, many are well-designed and offer significant replayability. The element of chance, such as card draws and dice rolls, adds tension and variability, encouraging players to revisit the game despite occasional frustrations.
- “You can get screwed by the card draw sometimes in particular scenarios, and it's frustrating when the dice go against you, but there is lots of replayability and tension.”
- “Although some scenarios are skewed, there are a number of very evenly balanced scenarios which are eminently replayable.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious, with some expressing that it requires significant time investment, likening it to needing a second life to fully engage. Additionally, the tutorial is criticized for being unengaging, making it difficult for players to learn the game effectively.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Found the tutorial tedious; I couldn't sit through it to learn how to properly play.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is well-optimized, running smoothly while effectively conveying the chaotic nature of command, though players may experience some inconsistency in controlling their units.
- “The game runs smoothly and does a great job of capturing the chaos of command, as both you and your opponent face the challenge of the inconsistent ability to command whoever you want at any time.”