Medieval Defenders
- November 11, 2016
- Creobit
- 6h median play time
"Medieval Defenders" is a tower defense game set in a medieval fantasy world. Players must build and upgrade towers to defend their castle from enemy attacks, using a variety of weapons and spells. With multiple levels, upgrades, and enemies, players must strategize and adapt to survive.
Reviews
- Some players found the game enjoyable for a short period, providing a fun experience.
- The graphics are decent and the game has a classic tower defense style that some players appreciate.
- The game has a variety of towers and upgrade systems that can be engaging for casual play.
- The game employs a pay-to-win model, requiring players to spend real money to continue after losing attempts.
- It is a poorly optimized mobile port with limited gameplay options, including a lack of resolution settings and a confusing user interface.
- Many players reported that the game is repetitive and lacks originality, being a reskin of other titles from the same developer.
- graphics8 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 63 % neutral mentions
- 38 % negative mentions
The graphics in the game are generally considered decent, but players are frustrated by the lack of options to customize settings or change the resolution, which limits their ability to improve the low-quality visuals. Additionally, some users have reported crashes, further detracting from the overall experience.
“There's no options to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
“There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low-quality graphics.”
“Heck, except for the artwork, this is almost the exact same game as their dinosaur TD game, whose name escapes me.”
- monetization8 mentions
- 38 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 38 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized, with users pointing out the presence of $99 microtransactions that feel excessive and out of place, especially for a tower defense title. Additionally, the game is described as a poor mobile port, cluttered with inactive in-app purchases, and lacking transparency about its monetization on the Steam page.
“As a tower defense game, it is not bad, but the in-game purchases of $99 are just weird, especially with only 5 lives and a 30-minute timer after you expend one.”
“The Steam page doesn't provide information about it, but this game has been designed for microtransactions on mobile devices.”
“Terrible mobile port packed with $99 in-app purchases everywhere!”
“Terrible mobile port packed with (inactive) $99 in-app purchases everywhere!”
“The Steam page doesn't give info about it, but this game has been made for microtransactions on mobile devices.”
“$99 microtransactions”
- story4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is perceived as lacking engagement, with players expressing disinterest in the narrative. It conveys a moral about perseverance and the unpredictability of life, but ultimately fails to resonate with the audience.
“Moral of the story: you never know what life has in store for you, and if I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
“Hardly a success story; gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
- music4 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The music in the game is noted for its relaxing quality, providing a soothing experience for players. The original soundtrack, while similar to the game's sound, offers enhanced detail and sound quality, justifying its cost. Overall, the music contributes positively to the gaming experience.
“I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
“The original soundtrack, which cost as much as the game, provides better detail and sound compared to the original game's sound, but it is similar.”
“The original soundtrack, which cost as much as the game, provides better detail and sound compared to the original game's music, but ultimately feels quite similar.”
- gameplay4 mentions
- 25 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The gameplay is criticized for being poorly optimized for PC and lacking depth, featuring only basic mechanics with limited tower types and upgrades. Players find the dynamics to be among the worst in the tower defense genre, with a simplistic approach that fails to engage.
“The mechanics are basic: 4 kinds of towers, with 3 upgrades and 2 specializations each; there are also 5 power-ups and ranks of enhancements for all through a system of potions.”
“This is a terrible mobile game not optimized for PC, and the gameplay dynamics are some of the worst I've ever experienced in any tower defense game.”
“The mechanics are basic: there are 4 types of towers, each with 3 upgrades and 2 specializations; additionally, there are 5 power-ups and enhancement ranks for all through a system of potions.”
- grinding2 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players note the absence of grinding for elixirs, which are necessary for buffs, making it challenging to progress through tougher levels. This lack of grinding may impact the overall gameplay experience, as players cannot easily enhance their abilities.
- optimization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The game is poorly optimized for PC, with users expressing frustration over its gameplay dynamics, particularly in the tower defense genre. Overall, it is considered subpar in terms of performance and user experience.
“This is a terrible mobile game that is not optimized for PC, and the gameplay dynamics are among the worst I've ever experienced in any tower defense game.”