Skip to main content

Master of Orion

A moderately successful execution of the standard 4X formula with a flair for leaders and enjoyably complex combat.
Master of Orion Game Cover
72%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
stability, grinding
76% User Score Based on 5,101 reviews
Critic Score 66%Based on 6 reviews

Platforms

LinuxPCMac OSWindows
Master of Orion Game Cover

About

Master of Orion is a single player and multiplayer casual simulation game. It was developed by NGD Studios and was released on August 25, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from both critics and players.

Master of Orion, the award-winning and critically acclaimed strategy game, has returned. The iconic 4X strategy gameplay of Explore, Expand, Exploit and Exterminate that formed the blueprint for a whole generation has been resurrected and upgraded. Stunningly enhanced for a new line of players, Master of Orion inherits and redefines its core elements, providing a graphically beautiful and deeply r…

Skip User Reviews

76%
Audience ScoreBased on 5,101 reviews
graphics415 positive mentions
stability162 negative mentions

  • The game captures the nostalgia of the original Master of Orion series while updating the graphics and voice acting.
  • It offers a good balance of strategic depth and accessibility, making it suitable for both newcomers and veterans of the genre.
  • The ship customization and variety of alien races add to the replayability and enjoyment of the game.
  • The game suffers from significant bugs, including freezing during turns and issues with AI behavior, making it frustrating to play.
  • Many mechanics feel simplified or dumbed down compared to previous entries, leading to a lack of depth in gameplay.
  • The real-time combat system is poorly executed, often resulting in chaotic battles that lack the strategic control of turn-based combat.
  • graphics
    907 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of "Master of Orion" have received widespread praise for their modern polish and vibrant aesthetic, effectively updating the classic look while maintaining a connection to its roots. Many reviewers noted the sharp visuals, improved 3D models, and engaging animations, although some criticized the overly cartoony style that detracted from the game's epic feel. Overall, the graphics are considered a significant enhancement over previous iterations, contributing to an immersive experience despite some minor performance issues and gameplay criticisms.

    • “Improved graphics: on the surface, the visuals are sharp and polished, with modern 3D models and shiny effects.”
    • “Visually, Master of Orion embraces a clean, colorful art style that pays homage to its classic roots while updating the look for modern audiences.”
    • “The graphics are absolutely gorgeous, and the voice acting is superb, as one would expect given the quality of the voice acting talent in the game.”
    • “While the graphics are flashier, they ironically hurt the experience by leaning into a cartoony style that strips away the epic feeling of commanding the stars.”
    • “This game seems to take the crisp simplicity of Moo1 and combine it with modern gaming sensibilities and dull, generic graphics.”
    • “Despite all the effort for graphics and voice acting, this Moo version seems unfinished and done without enough love for the game.”
  • gameplay
    799 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the new Master of Orion has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its nostalgic turn-based 4X mechanics reminiscent of the original series, while others criticize its oversimplified systems and reliance on war mechanics. The game is noted for its streamlined interface and accessibility for newcomers, but some veterans feel it lacks the depth and complexity of earlier titles, leading to repetitive gameplay. Overall, while the graphics and presentation are praised, the gameplay is seen as a blend of classic elements with modern updates, though it may not satisfy those seeking a more intricate strategy experience.

    • “Fantastic gameplay even after all these years (strategy at its purest).”
    • “The game streamlines many traditionally complex 4x mechanics, making them easier to understand and manage without sacrificing nuance.”
    • “It delivers a rewarding blend of exploration, strategy, and diplomacy that offers countless hours of gameplay.”
    • “The pollution mechanic in the base game makes it frustrating to play to the point of annoyance.”
    • “This design philosophy, this disconnecting of reality from gameplay mechanics, this imposition of senseless contrivances, is so loathsome to me that I quit the game, probably to never play it again.”
    • “The gameplay is still incredibly bland, visually and in gameplay.”
  • music
    200 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising its orchestral quality and immersive atmosphere, while others criticize its repetitiveness and lack of variety, often leading players to turn it off. Many appreciate the nostalgic elements from previous titles, but feel that the implementation could be improved to avoid looping the same tracks excessively. Overall, while the soundtrack is generally well-produced and fitting for the game's theme, it suffers from a lack of distinctiveness and emotional engagement.

    • “The soundtrack and sound effects complement the space-faring theme, enhancing immersion without becoming repetitive or intrusive.”
    • “The game's music is also excellent, with a sweeping orchestral score that adds to the epic scope of the game.”
    • “The music is really grand and well executed as well, and I'm a big fan of the cheeky news reporter robots that are used to notify the player of major events in the galaxy.”
    • “The music composed by Dave Govett is some of the best I have heard in these types of games; however, the way his music is incorporated into the game is very poor, where we end up hearing basically the same two musical loops over and over again, ad nauseam.”
    • “The soundtrack is like 3 songs that loop over and over again.”
    • “The music is just elevator music; I could recommend Endless Space 2 again or I could go to Stellaris, which also has a very good soundtrack, or I could even cite Galactic Civilizations 2, which is free or something these days, apparently, and has at least one good, memorable song.”
  • stability
    176 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is widely criticized, with numerous reports of severe bugs, frequent crashes, and freezing during gameplay, particularly in late-game scenarios. Many users note that the game is unplayable without community patches, and issues persist across various platforms, including significant problems with AI behavior and combat mechanics. Overall, the game is described as a "buggy mess," leading to a frustrating experience for players.

    • “I had no glitches, crashes, slow downs, it was a beautiful seamless experience.”
    • “It has AAA graphics and voice acting, and despite a few examples, it is bug-free and performs well on a technical level.”
    • “To be fair, this game is pretty bug-free and is ideal for newcomers to the space 4X genre.”
    • “In the recent version, the game does not start anymore... after the loading screen, it freezes and Windows asks to wait for the program.”
    • “Game is broken, freezes and is unrecoverable.”
    • “Game keeps saying not responding when trying to load a new session; spend your money elsewhere before you fall for a buggy game that looks good but offers nothing else.”
  • story
    106 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is largely criticized for its minimal narrative focus, prioritizing sandbox gameplay over a rich lore experience, which leaves players wanting more depth and engagement. While some elements, such as well-developed races and engaging single-player campaigns, hint at potential, many reviewers express disappointment over the lack of a cohesive campaign or significant story arcs. Overall, the game is seen as lacking in storytelling, with many players desiring a more immersive narrative experience akin to other titles in the genre.

    • “Baldur's Gate 3 is a good example where good voiceovers in a very rich storyline with alternate paths are a key investment!”
    • “The game's single-player campaign is engaging and well-written, with a variety of missions that test the player's strategic abilities.”
    • “Good simple gameplay, story, and world building.”
    • “Additionally, the narrative elements are minimal, focusing more on sandbox gameplay than on story-driven content, which might not satisfy players seeking a rich lore experience.”
    • “Throughout the whole game, I was left wondering when some sort of story would show up.”
    • “The game has almost no storyline and very few side interactions.”
  • optimization
    88 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received significant criticism, particularly for its poor performance in late-game scenarios, where players experience long wait times between turns and significant slowdowns. Despite some users noting that performance improves with certain mods and patches, many agree that the game fails to utilize modern hardware effectively, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences. Overall, while there are instances of good performance on lower settings or with fewer opponents, the consensus is that the game requires substantial optimization improvements to enhance playability.

    • “The graphics are really stunning for a 4x strategy game and it feels very well optimized for a game still in early access.”
    • “The game runs smoothly on my older system and looks fantastic.”
    • “With optimization and time, this will shape up to be a great 4x title when all the wrinkles get ironed out.”
    • “Game is slow to load on turns, pointing at poor optimization.”
    • “Clearly, this code is just poorly optimized.”
    • “Edit: this game has the worst performance I have seen in my life; late game in a huge galaxy, it's able to freeze a high-end PC made 5 years after this game was released for over a minute between turns, and for a good 3 minutes on game load.”
  • replayability
    87 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews highlight a mixed perception of replayability across the game, with some players praising its depth, variety of races, and strategic gameplay that encourages multiple playthroughs. However, others express concerns about the game becoming repetitive and lacking the complexity and variety found in older titles, leading to diminished replay value over time. Overall, while many find it engaging and replayable, there are significant critiques regarding its long-term appeal and depth.

    • “Your strategy needs to adapt depending on what race you play, which gives it a high replayability!”
    • “The gameplay is deep and strategic, and the variety of races and technologies adds a level of replayability that is hard to find in other games.”
    • “This game has a high replay value and has a lot to do in-game from designing ships to assigning population tasks on a planet (think Civ in space) and a lot more besides.”
    • “It's fun, but it definitely gets old and doesn't offer a lot of replay value in my opinion.”
    • “The game feels short and with so few races and differences, it has little replayability.”
    • “The game has no replay value, and although many of the iconic features from previous games did make it in, they're underwhelming from a gameplay perspective.”
  • humor
    75 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with many players appreciating its quirky and light-hearted moments, particularly through the Galactic News Network (GNN) and various character interactions. While some find the humor charming and nostalgic, others criticize it as forced or cheesy, suggesting it may not resonate with everyone. Overall, the game successfully incorporates humor to enhance the gameplay experience, though opinions on its effectiveness vary widely.

    • “The game doesn't take itself too seriously and is full of quirky and funny moments to keep you entertained throughout your gameplay.”
    • “It's a perfect blend of modern mechanics and classic charm, with deep gameplay, epic space battles, and a healthy dose of humor.”
    • “The news broadcasts are funny, the lines the characters say are filled with cute geek references and stuff like that, and the visual polish feels like watching an animated movie at its best moments.”
    • “Oh, I almost forgot how annoying and unfunny the GNN is.”
    • “Awful (not funny) advisors, starlanes (WTF), awful tactical combat, awful GNN broadcasts, boring pollution mechanics... I could go on and on.”
  • grinding
    69 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews indicate that grinding in the game is a significant issue, with many players finding the gameplay tedious and repetitive, especially during the late game. Micromanagement of colonies, resource allocation, and turn-based mechanics contribute to a sense of monotony, making the experience feel like a slog rather than an engaging challenge. While some players appreciate the streamlined features compared to previous titles, the overall sentiment leans towards frustration with the excessive grinding required to progress.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “The world-building is simple, but not tedious; they need to fix the production function, you should be able to 'idle' your production if you need to for whatever reason.”
    • “Within the first hour of the game, I feel I'm just going through the motions, and many people are reporting that the endgame is just a tedious slog.”
    • “It can be fun, but it's hard to justify the price when there are many well-crafted 4X games out there with superior game mechanics. Another is a crisper, more well-thought-out UI; opening a tab to get to another tab was just time-consuming and tedious.”
    • “Managing the population allocation and the build queue is fine for a couple of planets, but it gets to be a tedious grind when you get 15, and painful for large maps.”
  • atmosphere
    33 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game has received mixed reviews, with some praising its beautiful graphics, music, and voice acting that create an inviting and immersive experience reminiscent of classic titles like Master of Orion. However, others feel it lacks the depth and sense of wonder that characterized earlier games in the genre, resulting in a more generic feel. Overall, while the game captures some nostalgic elements, it struggles to fully deliver the rich atmosphere expected from a space strategy game.

    • “The voice acting on the AI factions is very good, and the whole game has a nice atmosphere as a result.”
    • “It's a rather niche and simple 4X game, but the art, voice acting, and music make for a very inviting atmosphere.”
    • “Beautiful graphics, music, aesthetics, and atmosphere.”
    • “Compared to Master of Orion 3, this one just didn’t capture the same depth, atmosphere, or soul that made the originals unforgettable.”
    • “Lack of atmosphere: the sense of wonder and tension that made you feel like you were commanding a galactic empire is gone.”
    • “I didn't get the atmosphere or the mood of a vast and overwhelming universe full of dangers and artifacts, which I always expect to experience playing 4X space strategies.”
  • emotional
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The emotional aspect of the game is a mixed bag, with players expressing nostalgia and heartfelt connections to the original title, while also lamenting the lack of depth and emotional weight in gameplay mechanics. Many appreciate the music and animations that evoke a sense of grandeur and inspiration, yet feel that the absence of meaningful choices and character development diminishes the emotional impact of the experience. Overall, while the game successfully taps into nostalgia, it struggles to deliver a fully engaging emotional journey.

    • “Heartfelt remake of the greatest 4X game ever.”
    • “Playing it made me feel like it did back then, and that's what I wanted.”
    • “Excellent music and voiceover work made me feel inspired in the way that a space orchestra really should do - to put forth your most noble effort to expand your race's horizon.”
  • monetization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized, with players expressing frustration over constant advertisements and viewing it as a blatant cash grab that exploits nostalgia for profit. Many feel that the intrusive ads detract from the gameplay experience and contribute to a perception of poor quality and clumsy delivery.

    • “Every time I start the game, I am forced to watch 10 seconds of advertisement.”
    • “The perfect example of a cash grab using a famous series.”
    • “Now I see that this was just another cash grab seeking to take advantage of an existing fanbase so they can milk the nostalgia for all it's worth before presenting a steaming pile of shiny crap.”
  • character development
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviewers appreciate the character development for its nostalgic nod to the original game's designs, highlighting how the new character designs effectively draw inspiration from the series' best elements.

    • “Many of the character designs of the original species really hearken back to the first game's designs, and it's great to see that they drew inspiration from the best the series had to offer.”
Skip Critic Reviews
Skip Game Offers

Buy Master of Orion

30h Median play time
83h Average play time
10-162h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 45 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Master of Orion

Games Like Master of Orion

Stars in Shadow Image
Galactic Civilizations III Image
StarDrive 2 Image
Endless Space 2 Image
Endless Space Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Master of Orion is a casual simulation game.

Master of Orion is available on PC, Mac OS, Windows and Linux.

On average players spend around 83 hours playing Master of Orion.

Master of Orion was released on August 25, 2016.

Master of Orion was developed by NGD Studios.

Master of Orion has received mostly positive reviews from both players and critics. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

Master of Orion is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Stars in Shadow, Galactic Civilizations III, StarDrive 2, Endless Space 2, Endless Space and others.