MoW: Face Off M

About

MoW: Face Off M is a single player and multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by ISOTX and was released on July 16, 2015. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

The Battlefield Card Game with a roguish community. Come join us and immerse yourself in an alt history Steampunk universe where the impossible is possible. Choose the faction that complements your play style, build a devious deck & battle your opponent across the battlefield. + iOS & Android.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

76%

Audience ScoreBased on 304 reviews

gameplay17 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Easy to pick up and play, making it accessible for new players.
Engaging gameplay with a unique blend of card mechanics and tactical movement.
Active developer support and a friendly community enhance the gaming experience.

Game has been abandoned by developers, rendering it unplayable due to offline servers.
Many players express disappointment over the removal of the original game, which was considered better.
The game is perceived as pay-to-win, with a significant grind required to be competitive without spending money.

gameplay
58 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
64%
7%
The gameplay of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating its strategic depth and unique mechanics, particularly in the context of a WWII steampunk theme. While the tutorial is helpful for newcomers, some users feel that the gameplay has been simplified compared to its predecessor, leading to concerns about balance and depth. Overall, the game is described as addictive and engaging, though it suffers from occasional bugs and limited gameplay modes.
- “A fun and addicting strategy card game that challenges you to improve your deck and gameplay to earn rewards and move up levels and placement tiers.”
- “Very addictive game, easy and intuitive gameplay, but with a lot of strategy involved.”
- “The large range of card types, different factions, and the unique nature of the gameplay ensures a varied and interesting experience with no two player-made decks being the same.”
- “Doubt the developers care anymore, sad, I loved this game for its unique gameplay and mechanics and it's been ruined. I read up on the game devs and apparently this kind of poor behavior is common.”
- “It takes the universe that the original March of War crafted, and then dumbs down the gameplay to Rise of Mythos (or any other card-based game similar to it) levels.”
- “When you have a unit with a range of 3 and it has made the trek across the screen, that range is useless and it adds little to speeding up your enemies' demise due to the game mechanics.”
graphics
23 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
48%
17%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the clean and well-textured 3D models and animations, while others find them unappealing and simplistic. Users note that the visuals are suitable for low-end PCs and that there are enhanced versions available, but many feel that the graphics do not significantly elevate the gameplay experience. Overall, while the graphics are decent and functional, they lack the wow factor that some players desire.
- “Yes, a card game with great animation graphics!”
- “The graphics are extremely well done with lots of content and relative animations.”
- “The graphics and aesthetics do the job; everything is sharp and clean, and there's no need to ask for more.”
- “The visuals quickly become stale and the audio just becomes repetitive.”
- “Unappealing graphics, very simple mechanics, unbalanced cards, unappealing (WW2) setting, short matches...”
- “Graphics: 1/5”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
37%
38%
The game's story aspect is noted to be underdeveloped, with players expressing a desire for a more engaging single-player storyline mode, particularly related to the "face off" narrative. While the gameplay is enjoyable, it lacks depth and rewards, leading to a feeling of limited engagement. Overall, the narrative elements could benefit from expansion to enhance player interest and immersion.
- “Let me tell you a story.”
- “This is the spin-off of MOW which is also free-to-play. The game has connection issues in the last few months, but it seems improved in the latest update. The domination tactic is unique, but if they add more room to play, the gameplay will be more strategic.”
- “Make a decent storyline mode for single player (for players who are interested in learning more about MOW: Face Off story!).”
- “This is the spin-off of MOW which is also free-to-play. The game has connection issues in the last few months, which seem improved in the latest update. The domination tactic is unique, but if they add more room to play, the gameplay will be more strategic. Only three lanes are very limited; the game will end too fast, and you really need to get very good cards in the very limited grid. By the way, the game itself is enjoyable but not really rewarding. Maybe they can add more quests or something for players to get more interest to continue. It's 3/5 for me.”
- “While the game is pleasantly easy to learn, mastery is a different story.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
43%
14%
43%
The music in the game is generally described as pleasant and easy to listen to, enhancing the overall experience, though some players note a limited variety with only a few tracks on repeat. While the graphics and gameplay receive praise, the soundtrack has received mixed reviews, with one user rating it as low as 2/5. Overall, the music contributes positively but may benefit from more diversity.
- “It contains various levels and bonuses; excellent graphics and melodious music make this game a special treat.”
- “The game also runs very smoothly, the art is nice, and I like the soundtrack as well.”
- “Music is good and easy on the ears, but there may be a lack of quantity in terms of songs.”
- “Music seems to consist of 3 tracks played on repeat with a 10-minute silence before repeating the loop; however, this could be a bug or a personal problem I had, so keep that in mind.”
- “I was skeptical at first; the graphics, music, and interface are so-so - but the strategic gameplay is really good - and this is only early access.”
- “Music: 2/5”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
80%
The game's stability has been a significant concern, with users reporting frequent crashes and bugs, particularly during loading and gameplay. While some improvements have been noted since launch, such as reduced bugs and better performance in smaller resolutions, issues like a problematic achievement system persist, leaving players frustrated. Overall, the game is still considered unstable and in need of further development.
- “Runs great in a tiny window, although at 800x600, achievements do cover the button to close the battle stats after a match.”
- “Decent game, but very slow to load and pretty buggy - prone to crashing quite a bit.”
- “The one Steam achievement is buggy (a dev confirmed this), so achievement hunters, back to bed with you guys.”
- “Buggy game with interesting ideas that has been destroyed by the devs. Is there a company interested in bailing this company out and/or just buying their IP?”
grinding
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding is a significant aspect of the game, particularly for players looking to build competitive decks without spending money, as it involves repetitive tasks to earn cards. While some find the grind addictive and enjoyable, others express frustration over the slow player base and the challenges of finding PvP matches. However, daily objectives and login bonuses help alleviate some of the grind, and future updates are expected to enhance the experience.
- “To craft a competitive deck will require a little grinding if you choose not to purchase cards outright.”
- “It's pretty simple, grindy, and the player base is dead; I couldn't find a single PvP match, so I had to PvE all.”
- “Purchasing packs of cards can require lots of grinding and may yield frustratingly poor results, and the game does not yet have a large player base, so PvP can get a bit slow at times.”
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is highlighted by its amusing voice acting and clever, witty elements, particularly in the juxtaposition of historical units like Stukas and Churchill tanks within the same deck. Players appreciate the smart and humorous design that adds a lighthearted touch to the gameplay experience.
- “The voices are funny (at least I think so).”
- “A smart and funny trading card game!”
- “It's funny to note that you have Stukas and Churchill tanks in the same deck... but it's from the world where the game takes place.”
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
150%
The monetization model is well-balanced, allowing players to build strong decks without the need for purchases, although in-game purchases are available. Users appreciate that the game does not feel like a cash grab or pay-to-win, making it one of the best free-to-play options on Steam.
- “Great game, one of the best free-to-play titles on Steam. In-game purchases are available, but you can also build a great deck without spending money by leveling up and earning coins.”
- “The monetization model is fair, allowing players to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend money.”
- “I appreciate that the game offers cosmetic items for purchase, while the core gameplay remains accessible to everyone.”
- “The monetization system feels exploitative, with prices that are far too high for what you get.”
- “I feel pressured to spend money to keep up with other players, which ruins the experience.”
- “The game constantly pushes microtransactions, making it hard to enjoy without spending extra.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game effectively immerses players in a World War atmosphere, allowing for quick engagement in battles, making it ideal for those with limited time for lengthy campaigns.
- “I never have time to play long campaigns, and when I do have time, I need a game where I can jump straight into the battle. This game gives me that, along with a great taste of the World War atmosphere, which is one of my favorite genres.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game is perceived as frustrating, with players feeling that victory can be achieved without direct engagement, leading to a sense of helplessness and dissatisfaction.
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is well-optimized, providing a smooth experience, particularly for casual gamers who find the battle system easy to understand and engage with.
- “The game runs smoothly, and the battle system is easy to master, even for casual gamers.”
- “The optimization is impressive, allowing for seamless gameplay and quick load times.”
- “I appreciate how well the game performs on lower-end systems without sacrificing quality.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players appreciate the game's high replayability, as it allows them to start on an easier difficulty to familiarize themselves with the mechanics before progressing to more challenging levels.
- “Getting to know the game on easy mode first, then advancing to higher difficulties offers great replayability.”
- “The variety of choices and paths you can take makes each playthrough feel fresh and exciting.”
- “With multiple endings and character builds, I find myself coming back to explore new strategies every time.”