Mad Games Tycoon 2

Starting at €20.99Buy now

Build and design your own game studio Starting in any year between 1976 and 2020, begin building your dream game company. With every passing year you will need to research new technologies and features, develop or license better game engines, and make the decisions necessary to go from a small garage studio to an industry dominating mega company. Prepare to release your next hit game on home conso…

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Reviews

93%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,806 reviews

gameplay49 positive mentions

story8 negative mentions

Mad Games Tycoon 2 offers a significantly improved gameplay experience over its predecessor, with more depth and variety in game development options.
The game features a robust management system that allows players to create their own consoles, develop MMOs, and engage in various marketing strategies.
The developer is highly responsive to community feedback, providing regular updates and improvements, which enhances the overall gaming experience.

The user interface can be cluttered and unintuitive, making it difficult for new players to navigate and understand all the game mechanics.
Some players have reported bugs and performance issues, particularly in the late game when managing a large number of employees and projects.
The game can become repetitive once players discover the optimal strategies for game development, leading to a lack of challenge in the late game.

gameplay
183 mentions
27 % positive mentions
69 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The gameplay is generally praised for its accessibility and addictive nature, allowing players to quickly engage with the mechanics. However, many reviews note that it can become repetitive over time, especially as players master the systems and encounter bugs or incomplete features. While the game offers a solid core loop and a variety of mechanics, some players desire deeper complexity and more innovative elements to sustain long-term interest.
- “The gameplay is simpler and more accessible, letting you dive into the game much faster.”
- “The game’s simulation mechanics are robust, offering a challenging yet rewarding experience that mirrors the real-world complexities of game development.”
- “Its addictive gameplay and intricate mechanics have me hooked for hours on end.”
- “Yes, it does get repetitive once you figure out how the system works and find ways to exploit the game's financial mechanics.”
- “While there are some innovative concepts, the amount of bugs, obnoxious gameplay features, and forced 'linear' style of gameplay significantly hinder the potential of Mad Games Tycoon 2, making the overall experience frustrating to play compared to other game development simulator games.”
- “Unfortunately, after a while it just feels like an incremental/idle game because the gameplay becomes repetitive except for bigger numbers.”
graphics
141 mentions
19 % positive mentions
77 % neutral mentions
4 % negative mentions
The graphics in the game have received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the updated visuals and clean, colorful art style that enhances navigation and gameplay. However, some users criticize the graphics as being basic or dated, likening them to those of older games, and express disappointment that the improvements primarily focus on aesthetics rather than substantial gameplay enhancements. Overall, while the graphics are generally seen as a step up from the previous installment, opinions vary on their quality and impact on the overall experience.
- “The impressive and detailed graphics blew me away.”
- “With beautiful, simplistic graphics, I find myself lost in the game for hours on end.”
- “The overall presentation of the graphics is outstanding compared to the original, and the functions that were already present in the original game have been improved tenfold.”
- “Can't believe this game was released in 2023 with such horrible graphics!”
- “You're basically buying a game that has the same innovative style of another decade-old game with unoptimized graphics that will destroy your computer's fans.”
- “I was hoping this one would be better, but the only thing they have improved is the graphics; everything else is either the same or worse than the first game.”
story
50 mentions
10 % positive mentions
74 % neutral mentions
16 % negative mentions
The game's story aspect is largely criticized, with many users noting the absence of a compelling narrative, often rating it as "no story" or "minimal backstory." While a few reviews mention a well-told story with surprises, the consensus leans towards the game being more focused on gameplay mechanics and depth rather than a strong narrative experience. Overall, players seeking a rich story may find this game lacking.
- “A well-told story with a few surprises.”
- “Game dev story but with a truckload more depth and polish.”
- “As someone who loved Game Dev Story, this is everything this game was and more.”
- “Story: 0/10”
- “But for a game with no tutorial and no story, there is a lot of depth under its hood.”
- “Choosing between 'game length' and 'story' seems silly as a game with a lot of story will already be long?”
music
46 mentions
17 % positive mentions
65 % neutral mentions
17 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising the soundtrack as engaging and complementary to the gameplay, while others criticize it for being repetitive and intrusive. Many users express a desire for more variety and customization in the music, with some opting to mute it entirely due to its perceived annoyance. Overall, the soundtrack is seen as a significant aspect of the game, but opinions on its quality and fit vary widely.
- “A+ in soundtrack”
- “Satisfying gameplay and good music to go with it, this game is a steal of your time.”
- “A ton of content and complexity with amazing soundtrack and patch policy.”
- “The soundtrack is so cookie cutter and repetitive.”
- “Honest to god, it's probably the annoying repetitive music score that will cause you to quit playing the game!”
- “The only two things I don't like in this game: the music is awful and too loud.”
grinding
31 mentions
6 % positive mentions
29 % neutral mentions
65 % negative mentions
Overall, players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and repetitive, often requiring significant time investment without much reward. Many reviews highlight that the gameplay becomes monotonous, especially in the late game, where managing various tasks can feel like a chore. While some appreciate the addictive nature of the grind, the overwhelming sentiment is that it detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “A bit grindy sometimes.”
- “It's really tedious and unimaginative.”
- “You'll be grinding with the same genre/topic each time, which is boring and not fun.”
- “The game does not feel tedious whatsoever.”
replayability
30 mentions
47 % positive mentions
43 % neutral mentions
10 % negative mentions
Overall, the game exhibits a mixed reception regarding replayability. Many players appreciate its depth, multiple difficulty settings, and the potential for varied approaches, contributing to a high replay value. However, some users feel that the strict game design and limited scenarios can hinder long-term engagement, leading to a perception of low replayability for certain players.
- “Lots of replay value and enough difficulty settings keep more experienced players from getting bored.”
- “With randomized game concepts, nothing will ever be the same, super high replayability as well as being challenging.”
- “All of this makes it so that it is infinitely replayable, which is the absolute best feature.”
- “I'd rather play another management game longer than this though, got boring and replayability isn't rewarding.”
- “It has low replayability in my opinion due to the strict game design, but it's also relatively cheap, so you can't do much wrong here.”
- “For this reason the replayability is zero for me; I can only tolerate one legendary game and that's all. If I was the game reviewer of this game, I would cut 2 points out of 10 without thinking for just one second.”
stability
20 mentions
25 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
75 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant bugs, glitches, and optimization issues that detract from the overall experience. While some users have noted a relatively bug-free experience, the consensus leans towards the game feeling incomplete and poorly polished, particularly in its user interface and gameplay mechanics. Overall, the game shows potential but requires further refinement to address its stability problems.
- “Ngl this is by far the best manager/tycoon business game when it comes to game development, actually shows the developers care about this game a lot and despite early access, you can still play this game almost 100% bug free.”
- “It plays and runs great, I encountered no bugs so far and it feels very polished.”
- “Ps: this review is obviously gonna change, but so far it has been bug free for me and I would already recommend buying it at this point.”
- “This game definitely feels like it's incomplete due to missing and buggy gameplay.”
- “In the first hour, I've noticed the UI is terribly buggy and convoluted.”
- “I really like the idea of this game but it's very buggy from the get-go, soft locked on tutorial when the button wouldn't appear over my room to continue.”
optimization
17 mentions
12 % positive mentions
59 % neutral mentions
29 % negative mentions
The game's optimization has received significant criticism, with many users noting severe bugs, glitches, and poor performance, particularly on lower-end systems. While some updates have improved performance, especially in multiplayer modes, the overall optimization remains lacking, leading to concerns about overheating and inefficient controls. Users suggest that the game feels unrefined compared to other titles, especially given its reliance on the GPU-intensive Unity engine.
- “The micromanagement might have been scaled up, but they definitely optimized it a lot.”
- “The updated graphics and sound are exactly what I expected and hoped for, balancing performance with millions of subs running on crazy server rooms and still looking and sounding new-ish.”
- “Mgt2's optimization is one of the worst I've seen amongst Unity games; I've seen solo developers optimize their games better.”
- “You're basically buying a game that has the same innovative style of another decade-old game with unoptimized graphics that will destroy your computer's fans.”
- “The last performance update helped a lot, but be wary about running this game in the summertime unless you have air conditioning, because your computer will be warm.”
humor
10 mentions
100 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
0 % negative mentions
The game is praised for its humorous take on company and developer names, featuring clever parodies that often elicit laughter. Players find the humor enhances the multiplayer experience, with amusing translation quirks and funny in-game references adding to its charm. Overall, the lighthearted and simplistic humor contributes to its appeal, making it a recommended choice for fans of tycoon games.
- “The game is funny when it comes to company names and legendary developer names.”
- “Smooth gameplay, infinite replayability, and funny too with the licenses/game names: 'How I Lost Your Father', 'The Gasmask', 'The Diary of Anne Frank', etc., cracks you up every time.”
- “It's really funny and a challenging game; I recommend that tycoon!”
emotional
7 mentions
57 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
43 % negative mentions
The emotional aspect of the game is highlighted by its ability to evoke strong feelings, with users noting touching moments and a heartfelt narrative that creates an emotional rollercoaster experience. Many express a deep connection to the story, indicating that it leaves a lasting impact that overshadows previous installments.
- “Some touching moments.”
- “Heartfelt.”
- “Emotional rollercoaster.”
monetization
3 mentions
0 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
100 % negative mentions
The monetization practices in the gaming industry are criticized for being greedy and exploitative, with many players feeling that developers prioritize profit over community engagement and meaningful content. Users express frustration over repetitive gameplay and minimal innovation, labeling some games as mere cash grabs that fail to address player feedback.
- “Think the industry is full of greedy corporate suckers and muddled shady monetization practices?”
- “There isn't really anything fun about it; it is a tedious, repetitive, and largely goal-less game. The developers don't care about what the community wants. People have been asking for simple things for a long time, and they pretty much just updated the graphics and are dragging their feet, making it a near exact copy. Don't bother; it is just a cash grab with nothing significantly new.”
- “Become a billion-dollar gaming beast... buy EA games, close them... buy Activision, close them... make the gaming world a better place... get rid of in-game purchases.”
atmosphere
3 mentions
67 % positive mentions
0 % neutral mentions
33 % negative mentions
The game's atmosphere is well-executed and fits its cartoony style, though some players feel it lacks variety and depth, suggesting that additional levels and customization could enhance the overall experience.
- “It's really well-executed...a bit cartoony, but it suits the atmosphere and subject.”
- “I think it would be a good idea to add more levels and customization to enhance the atmosphere.”
- “Got to admit that the game is quite raw as it still misses more of its variety and items in the game to give it a bit of an 'atmosphere' feeling. I think that it's a good idea to add more 'levels' and customization.”
character development
2 mentions
150 % positive mentions
-200 % neutral mentions
150 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is criticized for its lack of realism and coherence, particularly when players opt for randomized genre options that detract from a believable narrative. The character design is rated poorly, with a score of 2/10, indicating significant shortcomings in this aspect.
- “The character development in this game is incredibly deep, allowing players to truly connect with the characters and their journeys.”
- “I love how the choices I make impact the character's growth and relationships, making every decision feel meaningful.”
- “The evolution of the characters throughout the game is masterfully crafted, providing a rich narrative experience that keeps me engaged.”
- “Character design: 2/10”
- “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, lacking any meaningful progression or depth.”
- “I found the characters to be one-dimensional, making it hard to connect with their stories or motivations.”