Skip to main content

Game Dev Studio

85%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
story, replayability
85% User Score Based on 409 reviews

Platforms

PCPCWindowsWindowsLinuxLinux
Buy Nowfrom $3.57
Buy NowGet on Steam$9.99Buy NowGet on itch.io Store$9.99

About

"Game Dev Studio" is a single-player strategy game with stunning mechanics and pretty visuals. In this game, you run your own game development studio, where you can design game engines, hire employees, and create multiple teams to work on various projects. The game features non-linear progression, allowing you to expand your office space by buying new buildings. With various skills, attributes, and knowledge on topics, employees can contribute to making awesome games. Keep your employees engaged, and make sure to update your game engines to reach greatness in the gaming industry.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
Game Dev Studio screenshot
+8

85%
Audience ScoreBased on 409 reviews
graphics16 positive mentions
replayability3 negative mentions
  • The game offers a deep and engaging simulation experience, allowing players to manage various aspects of a game development studio.
  • The developer is responsive to community feedback and frequently updates the game, adding new features and fixing bugs.
  • The customization options for office layout and employee management add a unique layer of strategy to the gameplay.
  • The tutorial is lacking and can be confusing, making it difficult for new players to grasp the game's mechanics.
  • The user interface can be clunky and unintuitive, leading to frustration during gameplay.
  • The game can feel unbalanced, with some mechanics leading to unrealistic outcomes, such as games receiving high ratings despite missing key features.
  • graphics
    73 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the cute, pixelated art style reminiscent of retro games, while others criticize it for being low-quality and unpolished. Many agree that although the visuals may not be the strongest aspect, the engaging gameplay compensates for the graphical shortcomings. Overall, the graphics are seen as a nostalgic touch that may not appeal to everyone, but they do not detract significantly from the overall enjoyment of the game.

    • “The graphics are certainly appealing, feeling very Stardew Valley-like.”
    • “The pixel graphics suit the game nicely and the 80's aesthetics are very nice too.”
    • “The art style is honestly beautiful and reminds me a lot of 8-bit NES games.”
    • “Somehow feels dull a bit quickly to me due to the unsharp art style.”
    • “The personnel problems, the UI, and the off-putting graphics were just too much for the extremely well-done game development aspect to overcome.”
    • “While the premise is okay, the developer for some reason used godawful retro pixel graphics.”
  • gameplay
    60 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its depth and engaging mechanics, often compared favorably to similar titles like Game Dev Tycoon, with many players finding it rewarding and fun. However, several reviews highlight issues such as a lack of clear tutorials, a clunky user interface, and some mechanics feeling underdeveloped or confusing. Overall, while the gameplay offers significant replayability and enjoyment, it is somewhat hindered by its presentation and the need for better guidance.

    • “The gameplay is incredibly rewarding.”
    • “The gameplay is fun and with the new features, it is even more enjoyable!”
    • “Overall, this game is very enjoyable and with the number of gameplay features to learn, it offers much replayability!”
    • “I found a lot of the mechanics in the game to be unexplained, and there doesn't appear to be any useful guides or documentation anywhere.”
    • “The main mechanic of the game is incoherent, inconsistent, and overall garbage.”
    • “It's particularly disappointing that the really great parts of the game are ruined by a clunky interface and game mechanics that feel half-finished.”
  • story
    24 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect is described as having a linear structure with a mix of scenarios, including challenges like being abandoned by a publisher and the need to create a successful console. While some players appreciate the depth and functionality compared to similar titles, others find the storytelling elements lacking, particularly in terms of player agency and immersion. Overall, the story mode serves as a tutorial, but it has received mixed feedback regarding its execution and engagement.

    • “There are a few story scenarios, two notable ones being one where your publisher has kicked you to the curb and one where you must make a highly successful console.”
    • “The game offers a story mode where you must complete objectives, a free play mode without objectives, four different scenarios, and three levels of difficulties.”
    • “It provides deeper story than Game Dev Tycoon with equally fun gameplay.”
    • “Linear storyline.”
    • “I can't make the box art, write a blurb for the story, or make a dozen other tiny decisions that would help each game feel like something I actually ... uh... 'made'.”
    • “I think the developers had the wrong idea of tutorial when they created story mode.”
  • music
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally described as chill and pleasant, with some standout moments, particularly in the main menu. While it complements the atmosphere without being disruptive, many reviewers find it lacks memorability, rating it around 6/10. Overall, the soundtrack is appreciated for its calming qualities, though it doesn't elevate the overall experience significantly.

    • “The music is chill synth and the graphics, which some have complained about, were a-ok with me (I'm still scarred by Mad Games' tubercular potato design).”
    • “The music and aesthetic is very pleasing to the eye and ears; I have not encountered any crashes or bugs so far.”
    • “The pixel art is pretty to look at, and the soundtrack is nice.”
    • “While the music doesn't disrupt the mood, it's not very memorable.”
    • “The only pretty cool thing about this game is the main menu and the music there.”
    • “Graphics were sub-par, music was standard, gameplay was terrible, world design was nothing special.”
  • replayability
    11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers a mix of replayability, with some users noting it can become repetitive without mods or significant updates, while others highlight its depth and complexity as key factors for replay value. Mod support significantly enhances replayability, allowing for extensive customization and new content, making it appealing for long-term engagement. Overall, players appreciate the variety of choices and challenges, rating the base game around 7.5/10 for replayability, which can rise to 9/10 with mods.

    • “It's deep, complex, and has a ton of replay value.”
    • “Also, the mod support will ensure that this game will have replayability for years, if no real competition flourishes in the market.”
    • “I don't see much replayability without mods or unless the game gets some big feature updates in the future.”
    • “However, with mods, it is clear that it is far more replayable.”
    • “Of all the game dev sims I've played, this one provides the most depth and replayability through the vast amount of choices you are given, and with the recent workshop update, anyone who knows even a lick of Lua can pretty much add anything they want to the game.”
  • monetization
    10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with users expressing frustration over the ineffectiveness of in-app purchases and the overwhelming presence of advertising. While some appreciate the variety of advertising options, there is a sentiment that the monetization strategy leans towards quick cash grabs rather than sustainable, high-quality game development. Overall, players feel that the current monetization model does not adequately support deeper customization or enhance the gaming experience.

    • “I wish I could actually customize more in depth with in-app purchases and such.”
    • “It's very rewarding to watch your bank account increase beyond what the art of electronics could have ever dreamed, thanks to microtransactions!”
    • “Do you make high quality games slowly or do you make a quick cash grab (or make expansions to the same game for 30 years)?”
    • “In-app purchases are practically useless, though.”
    • “Games never get more than $100 a day from in-app purchases, even with 100% complexity, which is unrealistic.”
  • grinding
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be a mixed experience; while the depth of management can be engaging, it often becomes tedious, especially when juggling multiple teams and projects. The convoluted UI and unintuitive tools contribute to the frustration, making it difficult to manage various tasks efficiently. Despite these challenges, some players appreciate the potential for automation and hope for improvements in future updates.

    • “Grinding in this game feels rewarding and engaging, unlike other titles where it can become tedious.”
    • “The progression system makes grinding enjoyable, as each session feels like a step towards something meaningful.”
    • “I appreciate how the game balances grinding with fun mechanics, keeping me motivated to continue.”
    • “Menus are convoluted and tedious to navigate; tools are unintuitive (to move objects you need to be in... demolition mode?).”
    • “Cons: the game got tedious when you have 2-3 teams constantly making games; I hope something like automated project development will be implemented in the future.”
    • “I'm going to try to replay it and see if it's solid now that it's 'finished,' but it was tedious to play from the start, and the only hope of it being a good game was if it improved by its completion.”
  • optimization
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's optimization is highly praised, with users reporting excellent performance even on low-end hardware. Many consider it to be exceptionally well-optimized, achieving top-notch performance ratings. However, some players express a desire for additional performance-enhancing features similar to those found in other games.

    • “The performance is top notch.”
    • “It is also very well optimized and runs well on my toaster of a laptop.”
    • “The performance was great.”
    • “It would be nice to see performance-enhancing environments, similar to those in other games, or employees striving for a minimal standard for the environment.”
  • stability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability has received mixed feedback, with users noting persistent bugs and minor graphic glitches. However, many appreciate the regular bug fixes being implemented since release, indicating ongoing improvements despite the initial issues. Overall, while the game showcases impressive stylized design, its stability remains a concern.

    • “It's also still pretty buggy.”
    • “Some minor graphic glitches.”
    • “Granted, it is buggy, but we will get to that aspect.”
  • atmosphere
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is praised for its engaging and interactive atmosphere, particularly within the player's game development studio and the surrounding world. Despite some bugs, the overall ambiance contributes positively to the gaming experience.

    • “Fun and surprisingly atmospheric.”
    • “Game has right now so many bugs, but it also has a nice atmosphere!”
    • “The game has managed to create an interactive atmosphere both in the immediate scope of the player (in the player's game developing studio) and the world in which the player interacts.”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game excels in character development, featuring well-defined personalities and unique specialties that enhance player engagement and investment in the characters.

    • “But where it exceeded both was its interest in character development, featuring more detailed personalities and specialties.”

Buy Game Dev Studio

13h Median play time
12h Average play time
8-15h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Game Dev Studio

Mad Games Tycoon Image
88%1.5kreviews

Mad Games Tycoon

2016Casual Simulation
Mac OSMac OSNintendo SwitchNintendo SwitchPCPC+5
Mad Games Tycoon 2 Image
93%3.6kreviews

Mad Games Tycoon 2

2023Casual Strategy
Mac OSMac OSPCPCWindowsWindows
City Game Studio Image
90%602reviews

City Game Studio

2021Casual City Builder
Mac OSMac OSPCPCPhonePhone+4
Software Inc. Image
95%9.9kreviews

Software Inc.

2015Strategy
Mac OSMac OSPCPCWindowsWindows+1
Game Dev Tycoon Image
93%21.3kreviews

Game Dev Tycoon

2013Casual Management
iPhoneiPhoneMac OSMac OSNintendo SwitchNintendo Switch+8
Startup Company Image
81%3kreviews

Startup Company

2017Casual Strategy
Mac OSMac OSPCPCSteam DeckSteam Deck+2
Game Corp DX Image
88%2kreviews

Game Corp DX

2015Simulation
Mac OSMac OSPCPCWindowsWindows+1
Production Line Image
83%4.6kreviews

Production Line

2019Strategy
PCPCWindowsWindows
Computer Tycoon Image
85%1.1kreviews

Computer Tycoon

2017Management
Mac OSMac OSPCPCWindowsWindows
GamersGoMakers Image
68%174reviews

GamersGoMakers

2014Casual Strategy
PCPCWindowsWindows