Machine Armor Zero

About

Machine Armor Zero is a single player hack and slash game with post-apocalyptic and science fiction themes. It was developed by Midnight Altar Games and was released on January 19, 2024. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Machine Armor Zero is an isometric mech action survival game with fast paced gameplay and roguelite elements. Command a powerful mech across a diverse battleground. Choose from four distinctive classes, countless permanent upgrades, and tons of unique upgrades and weapons. Your journey centers on adapting your mech with a variety of upgrades tailored to your style. Master new abilities and unlock…

Skip User Reviews

69%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

graphics1 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

The game has solid and fun gameplay with a unique take on the roguelike survivors genre featuring mechs and sci-fi elements.
There is high replayability due to progression systems like permanent upgrades and perks, with the developer actively updating the game and listening to community feedback.
Graphics and mech controls have nostalgic appeal, and the game shows great potential to fill a niche for ARPG-style mech customization.

The game suffers from technical issues such as poor optimization, frame rate tied game speed causing slowdowns, bugs with weapon damage and ammo systems, and a clunky UI that needs improvements.
Content feels limited and unbalanced with few enemy types, overpowered weapons overshadowing others, and progression gated behind paywalls or meta-currencies.
Lacks polish and clarity in tutorials, keybinds, feedback systems (like damage numbers and health bar updates), and feels incomplete and grindy in its current early access state.

story
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Users feel the game lacks a strong or engaging story, noting it feels old or minimal. The focus is more on mission-based gameplay with upgrades rather than a compelling narrative. Some players miss having a deeper story element.
- “I might be tripping, but I remember playing a demo for this a while back and it was a mission-based game, so maybe that changed or I'm misremembering.”
- “I think what I miss is a story.”
- “Old story, but still works.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Grinding in the game is widely criticized for being tedious, repetitive, and poorly balanced, with limited enemy variety and extended early battles focused on increasing enemy health. Additionally, the grind is hindered by paywalls locking most characters, resulting in a frustrating and unoptimized experience.
- “Janky, grindy, poorly optimized, completely unbalanced, and three out of four characters are locked behind a paywall.”
- “You battle basically the same enemies that just get more health for like the first 15 minutes or so, and it is an incredibly boring and tedious thing.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from poor optimization, exhibiting janky performance and excessive grind. It feels outdated, runs worse than previous versions, and its balance is compromised, with most characters locked behind a paywall.
- “Jank, grindy, poorly optimized, completely unbalanced, and three out of four characters are locked behind a paywall.”
- “It's clearly a few versions behind and oddly has way worse performance.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The game features charming old-school isometric graphics, though occasional inconsistencies such as enemies visually centered in explosions not taking damage can affect the visual experience.
- “The game is in isometric view and has nice old school-like graphics.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is fundamentally solid but requires significant improvements to enhance the overall experience.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game offers very high replayability, encouraging multiple playthroughs and sustained engagement.