Luke Sidewalker

About Luke Sidewalker

Luke Sidewalker is a single player casual action adventure game. It was developed by Giant Fox Studios and was released on November 25, 2016. It received neutral reviews from both critics and players.

In a city that never sleeps, one man has a lot of places to be. Meet Luke, a perfectly average and mild mannered man living in New York City. Help him hurry his way down the sidewalks of New York City, through 7 neighborhoods including Time Square, LES, and Central Park.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip Games Like Luke Sidewalker

Looking for games like Luke Sidewalker? Here are top casual action adventure recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with FIST OF AWESOME, Uriel's Chasm or Camera Obscura.

59%240reviews

FIST OF AWESOME

2014

Hack and Slash

22%1.3kreviews

Uriel's Chasm

2014

Action

64%524reviews

Camera Obscura

2015

Casual Platformer

75%865reviews

Suicide Guy

2017

Platformer

+13

73%1.7kreviews

Maize

2016

Simulation

59%267reviews

Hamlet or the Last Game without MMORPG Features, Shaders and Product Placement

2012

Casual Puzzle

88%2.9kreviews

Reventure

2019

Casual Hack and Slash

47%409reviews

Akane the Kunoichi

2014

Arcade Platformer

67%5kreviews

Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days

2010

Open World Shooter

67%736reviews

Sinister City

2014

Casual Role Playing

More games like Luke Sidewalker

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

49%Audience ScoreBased on 71 reviews

humor20 positive mentions

replayability3 negative mentions

The game is free to play, making it accessible to everyone.
It features quirky humor and amusing character designs that resonate with those familiar with NYC.
Easy to obtain achievements and a short playtime make it appealing for casual gamers and achievement hunters.

Gameplay is repetitive and can become frustrating, with a lack of variety in levels and obstacles.
The controls and mechanics are poorly designed, leading to confusion and annoyance during play.
The audio quality and voice acting are subpar, detracting from the overall experience.

humor
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the quirky NPC lines and visual gags, while others find the humor to be weak or irritating, often relying on outdated stereotypes. While certain moments and characters elicit genuine laughs, the overall comedic execution may not resonate with everyone, leading to a divide in player enjoyment. Despite its attempts at humor, some reviews suggest that it falls short, with punchlines that fail to land and a reliance on clichés.
- “I like the Hasidim and the woman having babies; this part made me laugh out loud haha.”
- “It's a neat idea though, with some decent cheesy humor and nice pixel graphics.”
- “The characters are funny and the levels are fast-paced and not hard to pass.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50% positive mentions, 25% neutral mentions, 25% negative mentions
The game's graphics are characterized by retro pixel art, which some players find charming and well-executed, while others view it as outdated and simplistic. Despite the nostalgic appeal and some enjoyable details in the design, opinions are mixed, with many suggesting that the graphics alone do not compensate for the game's overall execution and concept. Overall, the pixel graphics are seen as a highlight for casual players, but they may not be enough to elevate the game's quality.
- “It's a neat idea though, with some decent cheesy humor and nice pixel graphics.”
- “Graphics were cute, I enjoyed the detail that was put into making the maps.”
- “If you want a couple hours of fun, this game should fit your casual needs, it's a well presented little game with its adorable pixel graphics, you can grab it any time at its cheap price tag and try it out!”
- “The game features obsolete retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
- “In summary: despite the retro appeal of the graphics and simplistic gameplay, I wouldn't recommend the game unless you get it for free... and maybe not even then.”
- “Despite tiny bits of humor, it's not a good game - bad concept, graphics (barely acceptable)...”
music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 34% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it to be a standout element that enhances the experience, while others criticize it as atrocious and poorly designed. Many users appreciate the retro style of the soundtrack, but the overall audio quality, including bitcrushed voices, detracts from the enjoyment for some. Ultimately, the music is seen as either a highlight or a significant flaw, depending on individual taste.
- “The music is the standout element though, it slaps hard.”
- “It brings a retro style of graphics and music while presenting in a present-day setting.”
- “Quirky and oddly addictive with super fun art and music!”
- “One of the most amusing parts of the game, for me at least, was the insistence that the game is better with sound, and the game has completely atrocious sound design with some of the worst music I've heard in my life.”
- “I can't say much about the sounds because I died from the bad music at the main menu, so I turned it off and didn't hear the rest of the soundtrack.”
- “The audio is probably the worst part; the voices in the game are bitcrushed, which in itself is okay since the game is going for that 'retro' feel, but then there is the music, which is not bitcrushed and that makes for an awful combination. To top that off, the music is horrible.”
gameplay
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 34% neutral mentions, 33% negative mentions
The gameplay has been criticized for being frustrating, repetitive, and overly simplistic, with many reviewers finding it lacking in depth and challenge. While some appreciate the retro graphics and music, the overall consensus is that the gameplay is mediocre and not worth the investment unless obtained for free.
- “The gameplay itself is rather straightforward.”
- “Presentation is really good, music well done, gameplay is a little basic, yet still enjoyable.”
- “The random dialogue from people on the street seemed distracting at best, though considering how little actual gameplay there is, perhaps it's needed.”
- “Avoid unless you like really frustrating gameplay with a weak semblance of a runner game.”
- “The gameplay was repetitive and annoying.”
- “In summary: despite the 'retro appeal' of the graphics and simplistic gameplay, I wouldn't recommend the game unless you get it for free... and maybe not even then.”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38% positive mentions, 24% neutral mentions, 38% negative mentions
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it unengaging and poorly presented, despite some attempts at humor. While a few appreciated the comedic elements and found the bosses entertaining, the overall consensus leans towards the narrative being lackluster and not matching players' expectations.
- “The story was funny and the bosses are hilarious.”
- “The story was... not engaging.”
- “No bugs happened, it has some story (at least), although it was badly presented and was below average.”
- “The 'story' of the game is pretty lackluster as well.”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, -100% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Character development in the game is highlighted by its engaging humor, well-crafted character design, and witty dialogue, although it is slightly marred by a questionable moment in the penultimate level. Overall, players appreciate the depth and personality of the characters.
- “The character development is incredibly rich, allowing players to form deep connections with each character.”
- “The dialogue is witty and engaging, enhancing the overall character design and making each character feel unique.”
- “The humor throughout the game complements the character arcs, making their journeys both entertaining and relatable.”
- “The character development feels shallow and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the protagonists.”
- “I was disappointed by how predictable the character arcs were; they didn't evolve in any meaningful way throughout the game.”
- “The choices I made didn't seem to impact the characters' growth, leaving me feeling like my decisions were meaningless.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game's replayability is considered low, with players able to achieve 100% completion in just 0.5 to 0.75 hours, indicating limited incentive to revisit the experience.
- “The replay value is low, and you can expect to 100% this game in just 0.5 to 0.75 hours.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of varied content means that replaying the game feels more like a chore than a fun experience.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be frustrating and tedious, often resulting in minimal rewards for their efforts.
- “It's very frustrating and tedious with very little payoff.”
- “The grinding feels endless and offers minimal rewards.”
- “I find the repetitive tasks to be a major drag on the overall experience.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Players report a strong emotional impact, with moments that evoke deep feelings, such as tears during pivotal realizations about the stakes involved in the game's narrative.
- “Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
- “The story's depth made me feel a profound connection to the characters, leaving me emotionally drained yet fulfilled.”
- “I found myself reflecting on my own life choices as the game unfolded, which is a testament to its emotional impact.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization model of the game is entirely free, which contrasts with the common criticism of games made with Gamemaker Studio being perceived as low-effort cash grabs.
- “Very often, game maker studios are used to create shovelware and lazy cash grabs, although in this case, the game is completely free.”