Luke Sidewalker
- November 25, 2016
- Giant Fox Studios
In "Luke Sidewalker" , play as Luke, a New Yorker always on the move, navigating chaotic sidewalks across 7 districts. Dodge various obstacles such as traffic, tourists, and pigeons, while catching the L train and solving puzzles. Help Luke reach his girlfriend, showcasing his unyielding determination and ambition.
Reviews
- The game features a cool and original concept that humorously captures the experience of navigating through busy New York City streets.
- It's a short game that offers easy achievements, making it appealing for achievement hunters.
- The pixel art style and some of the character designs are charming, and the humor can be amusing for those familiar with NYC culture.
- The gameplay is repetitive and frustrating, often feeling like a slog due to dense crowds and poorly designed mechanics.
- The sound design is criticized for being atrocious, with annoying voice lines and music that detracts from the experience.
- Many players found the game to be too short and lacking in depth, with a weak story and minimal character development.
- humor20 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is a mixed bag, with some players enjoying the quirky character lines and visual gags, while others find the humor to be weak or irritating, often relying on outdated stereotypes. While certain moments and characters elicit genuine laughter, many feel that the comedic elements do not consistently land, leading to frustration rather than enjoyment. Overall, the humor appeals to those who appreciate retro-style games, but it may not resonate with everyone.
“I like the Hasidim and the woman having babies (this part made me laugh out loud haha).”
“It's a neat idea though, with some decent cheesy humor and nice pixel graphics.”
“The story was funny and the bosses are hilarious.”
- graphics12 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 25 % negative mentions
The game's graphics are characterized by retro pixel art, which some players find charming and well-executed, while others view it as outdated and simplistic. Despite the nostalgic appeal and cute design, opinions are mixed, with many suggesting that the graphics alone do not compensate for the game's overall execution and concept. Overall, while the pixel graphics may attract casual players, they are not enough to elevate the game's quality significantly.
“It's a neat idea though, with some decent cheesy humor and nice pixel graphics.”
“Graphics were cute, I enjoyed the detail that was put into making the maps.”
“If you want a couple hours of fun, this game should fit your casual needs, it's a well presented little game with its adorable pixel graphics, you can grab it any time at its cheap price tag and try it out!”
“The game features obsolete retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
“In summary: despite the retro appeal of the graphics and simplistic gameplay, I wouldn't recommend the game unless you get it for free... and maybe not even then.”
“Despite tiny bits of humor, it's not a good game - bad concept, graphics (barely acceptable)...”
- music9 mentions
- 33 % positive mentions
- 33 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it to be a standout element that enhances the experience, while others criticize it as atrocious and poorly designed. Many users note a disconnect between the retro-inspired sound effects and the music, leading to an overall negative perception of the audio quality. However, a few players appreciate the soundtrack, describing it as enjoyable and well-executed, despite the game's other audio shortcomings.
“The music is the standout element; it slaps hard.”
“It brings a retro style of graphics and music while presenting in a present-day setting.”
“Quirky and oddly addictive with super fun art and music!”
“One of the most amusing parts of the game, for me at least, was the insistence that the game is better with sound, and the game has completely atrocious sound design with some of the worst music I've heard in my life.”
“I can't say much about the sounds because I died from the bad music at the main menu, so I turned it off and didn't hear the rest of the soundtrack.”
“The audio is probably the worst part; the voices in the game are bitcrushed, which in itself is okay since the game is going for that 'retro' feel, but then there is the music, which is not bitcrushed and that makes for an awful combination. To top that off, the music is horrible.”
- gameplay9 mentions
- 22 % positive mentions
- 44 % neutral mentions
- 33 % negative mentions
The gameplay has been criticized for being frustrating, repetitive, and overly simplistic, with many reviewers finding it shallow and lacking challenge. While some appreciate the retro graphics and music, the overall consensus suggests that the gameplay experience is mediocre and not worth the investment unless obtained for free.
“The gameplay itself is rather straightforward.”
“Presentation is really good, music well done, gameplay is a little basic, yet still enjoyable.”
“Avoid unless you like really frustrating gameplay with a weak semblance of a runner game.”
“The gameplay was repetitive and annoying.”
“In summary: despite the 'retro appeal' of the graphics and simplistic gameplay, I wouldn't recommend the game unless you get it for free... and maybe not even then.”
- story8 mentions
- 38 % positive mentions
- 25 % neutral mentions
- 38 % negative mentions
The game's story has received mixed reviews, with many players finding it unengaging and poorly presented, despite some attempts at humor. While a few appreciated the comedic elements and found the bosses entertaining, the overall consensus leans towards the narrative being lackluster and not matching players' expectations.
“The story was funny and the bosses are hilarious.”
“The story was... not engaging.”
“No bugs happened, it has some story (at least), although it was badly presented and was below average.”
“The 'story' of the game is pretty lackluster as well.”
- character development2 mentions
- 150 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
Character development in the game is noted for its engaging humor, strong character design, and witty dialogue, although it is slightly marred by a questionable moment in the introduction to the penultimate level. Overall, players appreciate the depth and personality of the characters.
“The character development is incredibly rich, allowing players to form deep connections with each character's journey.”
“The dialogue is witty and engaging, enhancing the overall experience of character growth throughout the game.”
“The character design is not only visually appealing but also reflects the unique personalities and backstories of each character.”
“The character development feels shallow and predictable, making it hard to connect with the protagonists.”
“I was disappointed by the lack of meaningful growth; characters seem to remain static throughout the game.”
“The choices I made didn't seem to impact the characters' development, leaving me feeling like my decisions were meaningless.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game is positively noted, as it is completely free, contrasting with the common trend of games made with Gamemaker Studio being perceived as low-effort cash grabs.
“Very often, game maker studios are used to create shovelware and lazy cash grabs, although in this case, the game is completely free.”
- replayability1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The game has low replayability, with players able to achieve 100% completion in just 0.5 to 0.75 hours, suggesting limited incentive to revisit once completed.
“The replay value is low, and you can expect to 100% this game in 0.5 to 0.75 hours.”
“Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
“The lack of varied outcomes makes replaying the game feel tedious and uninteresting.”
- grinding1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be frustrating and tedious, often resulting in minimal rewards for their efforts.
“It's very frustrating and tedious with very little payoff.”
“The grinding feels endless and offers minimal rewards.”
“I find the repetitive tasks to be a major drag on the overall experience.”
- emotional1 mentions
- 300 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
Players report a strong emotional impact, often feeling deeply moved by pivotal moments in the game, such as realizing the stakes involved, which can lead to tears and a profound connection to the narrative.
“Tears welled up in his eyes when he realized what exactly was at stake.”
“The story's depth made me feel a profound connection to the characters, leaving me emotionally drained yet fulfilled.”
“I found myself reflecting on my own life choices as the game unfolded, which is a testament to its emotional impact.”