Linx Battle Arena

About

Linx Battle Arena is a single player and multiplayer survival action adventure game. It was developed by Blueshift and was released on January 29, 2018. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Linx Battle Arena takes the online survival game in a new direction with this fast paced, action based Third Person Shooter. Starting with 1 gun and half health you will always be aware of how vulnerable you are. Play private games v friends or join public open games to dominate the arenas.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

77%

Audience ScoreBased on 26 reviews

gameplay1 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Fast-paced and exciting third-person shooter gameplay with unique mechanics like limited ammo and collecting money boxes to buy weapons.
Fun and addictive to play with friends, providing an enjoyable social and casual multiplayer experience.
Graphics are decent for an indie game, and the developer is responsive to feedback and bug fixes.

The game is effectively dead with no active player base or online servers, making it unplayable as intended.
Poor optimization and frequent bugs, including freezing issues and annoying camera system, detract from the experience.
Limited character variety, repetitive missions, and lack of meaningful single player content make the game shallow and unappealing to serious strategists.

graphics
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
30%
40%
30%
The game's graphics are generally considered adequate for an indie title, offering a decent environment for gameplay despite being somewhat outdated and occasionally relying on asset store elements. While not on par with major AAA studios, the visuals include nice animations and HUD, though some users note bugs and an annoying camera system. Overall, the graphics are acceptable given the game's early access status.
- “The graphics are more than up to the job of providing a good environment for the gameplay.”
- “Graphics aren't too bad either as it's in early access.”
- “Not complementing the graphics and it's early stage, this is actually a fun game to play.”
- “The game graphics look better than you might expect, but that's just because it looks like some or all of them are borrowed from asset stores or elsewhere.”
- “Lot of bugs, annoying camera system, and of course outdated graphics.”
- “In regards to the graphics, this is an indie game.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The story aspect of the game is notably lacking, with developers relying on multiplayer interaction instead of traditional storytelling and level design. Additionally, the game's promised missions and narrative features seem incomplete or missing even after early access.
- “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the game.”
- “I believe this game is stuck in development hell from the looks of it as what 'open world missions' and other features aren't in the game despite being out of early access.”
- “☐ story?”
gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The gameplay mechanics are well-designed and promising, suggesting that with further development, the game has strong potential to become very popular.
- “The mechanics are done right; you can feel that in some time from now, this game can become very popular.”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The optimization of the game is currently poor, leading to performance issues, though users believe it has potential if improved. Better graphics optimization is specifically needed to enhance the experience.
- “Has potential if executed correctly, but as of now poor optimization.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor is lighthearted, casual, and genuinely funny, often causing players to laugh out loud and enjoy a carefree, entertaining experience.
- “Funny, casual, and cheap, in the good sense.”
- “Falling off the side of the map because you are laughing so much.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's monetization is heavily criticized for aggressive microtransactions, making it feel less like a free experience and more similar to mobile app store pricing models.
- “On pricing and value for gamers, this isn't really free as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users note that grinding requires additional effort or resources, such as needing a second life, making it somewhat challenging and potentially time-consuming.
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report significant stability issues, with the game freezing consistently during startup while checking the build ID.
- “Every time I start it up, it freezes on checking build ID.”